Prison Labor, 13th Amendment, Political Campaigns & Child Welfare

Did you ever wonder why privatization of prisons is so popular amongst political candidates?

Prison labor!

Prision labor is legal and it is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, 13th Amendment.

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. 

Section 2 is the privatization clause.

How did this all slip past us for generations?

Well, it it is due to the fact that no one cares about the children, as the policies all originated in child welfare.

It goes like this.

A corporation increases profit margins using slave labor, then writes off the profit in tax exempt donations to a non-profit, a child welfare NGO, to funnel the money into political campaigns as contributions, and whatever is leftover in the NGO, await its profitable returns through social impact investments which use tax payer dollars.

Oh, those job creators!

So, if you need a job, just go to prison.

Prison labour is a billion-dollar industry, with uncertain returns for inmates

Prison labour is legally required in America. Most convicted inmates either work for nothing or for pennies at menial tasks that seem unlikely to boost their job prospects. At the federal level, the Bureau of Prisons operates a programme known as Federal Prison Industries that pays inmates roughly $0.90 an hour to produce everything from mattresses, spectacles,road signs and body armour for other government agencies, earning $500m in sales in fiscal 2016.

The full list of companies implicated in exploiting prison labor includes:

Bank of America;   Bayer;   Cargill;   Caterpillar;   Chevron;   Chrysler;   Costco;   John Deere;   Eli Lilly and Company;   Exxon Mobil;   GlaxoSmithKline;   Johnson and Johnson;   K-Mart;   Koch Industries;   McDonald’s;   Merck;   Microsoft ;Motorola;    Nintendo;   Pfizer;   Procter & Gamble;   Pepsi;   ConAgra Foods;   Shell;    Starbucks;   UPS;   Verizon;   WalMart;   Wendy’s.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Trust Funds Tales of Child Welfare Fraud: Shirley Temple, Jackie Coogan, Hillary Clinton & UNICEF

Gather around, my dear children, for the Celestial Goddess is about to tell the tale about the origins of child welfare fraud, the greatest fraud known to the history of human existence.

It all begins with the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, where most people fail to understand that "slavery" was never abolished because it forgot about chattel law.

In the reading of Section one, it clearly states that servitude is still a valid practice as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Now, mind you, it did not specify two key items with the first being whether the crime is an administrative or judicial conviction.

In child protection proceedings, poverty is the crime of abuse and neglect, "the failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child" and the due process is handled through administrative law, whereby the recommendations to "convict" are generated by a child protection worker and presented for judicial determination which turns on the federal funding spigot of placing a child as a ward of the court or state.

I state that these are administrative proceedings as one is guilty until proven innocent, without notification of proceedings, denied the right to face one's accuser, with no redress to reinstate the termination of the grant of the gift of custodianship or guardianship.

This is better known as parental rights, but, sadly, is not.

Parental rights are bestowed upon the States Attorney General.

Secondly, what has never been considered is the legal concept of slavery or involuntary servitude with children.

The Thirteenth Amendment did take children into consideration as children were property, chattel of the original guardian, to end the break up of families in slave auctions and sales.

Unfortunately, children never had any recognized rights which is why child labor immediately replaced the institution of slavery after the Emancipation Proclamation.

Jackie Coogan & Charlie Chaplin

Enters Jackie Coogan.

The world has forgotten about Jackie Coogan, but that is about to change as I am putting him back into the annals of history.

Jackie Coogan was a child actor discovered by Charlie Chaplin who was probably, to this day, one of the most famous child actors known to film.

He went on to star in the Lil' Rascals and did many major films.

Coogan, as a young child star, went on to launch the million dollar Near East Relief campaign that collected food, clothes & money for the child survivors of WWI and the Armenian Genocide, the first international relief effort for children.

The campaign, I guess you can say, should be considered as the original model for what we know today as the political fundraising campaign.

Well, when Coogan became 18 years of age, he found out his parents had squandered his childhood acting earnings, well over a million.

This led to the 1939 California legislation, the first Child Protection Law providing legal protections for child actor's earnings called the "Coogan's Act' or the Child Actor's Bill, the original concept for Social Security Accounts, where parents had to put a percentage into Coogan Blocked Trust Accounts but it contained a few flaws.

Now, enters Shirley Temple, or rather the "Shirley Temple Amendment" which extended protections of a child actor's contracts.

Shirley Temple's parents had taken more than $3.2 million from her account. 

Without going into her early career of Baby Burlesk, or the Meglin Kiddies, the core of this tale is children's trust funds.

As Coogan's career matured, he went on to become the beloved Uncle Fester of the Addam's Family while Shirley Temple became Shirley Temple Black, U.S. Delegate to the United Nations, and UNICEF.

The Thirteenth Amendment has a second section:

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation

 Only one person has attempted to broach Section 2, but that was met with much reproach from the Meanies.

Besides, the approach is flawed as it omits the rights of children, but for the purposes of this tale, the economic rights of the child, the posterity of the nation which is our national treasure, as children grow up to be productive, tax paying citizens.

Well, it seems there are others who are quite aware of this fact and went on to optimistically address these "economic deficiencies" of the Thirteenth Amendment.

Essentially, the California Coogan Blocked Trust Accounts established what we know today as trust funds for minors, Uniform Gift To Minors Accounts (UGMA) and Uniform Transfers to Minors Accounts (UTMA), for the private sector, but there was no national law to this effect.

Neither was there international law in dealing with children's trust funds.

Now, enters UNICEF, the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund.

UNICEF was created in 1946 as an extension of the successful international Near East Relief campaign to address the child refugees after WWII.

Sometime around early 1990s was the U.S. State Department through its international investment funding mechanism, USAID, partnered with UNICEF.

There are no records of what happened to all the money because UNICEF is a private organization, a trust fund for the children of the world.

It also seems that sometime during the transition of the Bush Administration into the Clinton Administration, there was a massive plundering of the Great Repository of the United States, the National Archives, with all records of the history of child welfare administration, programs, congressional hearings, and historic individuals work, such as Jackie Coogan and Shirley Temple Black, and anything else related to the history of UNICEF, have been destroyed.

The federal records were ordered to be transferred and disposed, not pursuant to any guidelines or rules of the National Archive Records Administration (see the checked box on the forms), but, instead the records were transferred to the William J. Clinton Presidential Library, where, upon executing a records search, one is sent.

https://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/

A private sector website, which is not even registered with ICANN

As seen in the records, below, federal records were either ordered to be destroyed, or donated to the private sector, where, in this instance, is the William J. Clinton Library, where there is no such thing as FOIA in the private sector.

And that, boys and girls, is how the Clintons with the assistance of the Bush Administration, pillaged the National Archives of the United States of America and manipulated the historic record, and destroyed the integrity of the Congress to obviate in rulemaking. 

But now, the question is why?

U.S. Administration of Children and Families Request For Records Disposition Order 1994 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Request For Records Disposition Authority To Destroy Office of Family Services Records 1993 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Administration for Children and Families Records Destruction Order for Universities and Private Foundations... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

So, why would the Clintons destroy federal records?

Children's trust funds!

Trust funds are dark money of the private sector because anything dealing with the welfare of a child is protected under the cloak of secrecy, and, immunity and can go into political campaigns.

Yes, the only laws on the books as to transfer and ownership of trust accounts are in the areas of banking and under child welfare, which has now been privatized.

If one must rely upon the state because they are too poor to "provide for the necessary needs of the child", that is abuse and neglect, grounds for termination of parental rights, or rather eminent domain of a Lis Pendens of Quiet Title on the chattel, which is nothing more than termination of parental rights.

The transfer of the chattel, the birth certificate, or, more intuitively, the deed to the child and the access to the equity, Social Security Trust Account of that child, transfers authority to the private sector over the trust account which can be leveraged into social impact bonds, or mortgaged.

And guess what you can do with a mortgage?

Bankruptcy or wipe it out, again with another Lis Pendens of Quiet Title on the chattel, which is nothing more than termination of parental rights.

And this ends another the tale of child welfare fraud.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Michigan Central Registry For Abuse & Neglect Is The Children's Trust Fund Database Of Trafficking Tiny Humans

FUN FACT! PRIVATIZED CONTRACTED CHILD PLACING AGENCIES AND CORPORATE PARENTS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE CENTRAL REGISTRY

In the spirit of fuchsia...

Why you should care about Michigan's Central Registry for Abuse and Neglect

What is Central Registry and why you should care?

The Central Registry is a database of human chattel for asset forfeiture for the Michigan Children's Trust Fund.  You should care because you are probably on it if you hail for the population of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

The First Data Collection Repository of asset forfeiture
Michigan Central Registry

There are 300,000 people on Michigan's Central Registry for abuse and neglect. The database gives select entities - Child Protective Services, schools, police, courts, and employers and volunteer agencies working with children - access to a subject's background information, including alleged harm to children that does not rise to the criminal level. Those convicted of harming children go on the registry.

The Central Registry is also a database of Medicaid fraud in child welfare because it contains evidence of false claims, double billing, phantom billing, human trafficking, asset forfeiture, and a bunch of other made up crap to cover up the state's operations of trafficking tiny humans through foster care and adoption.

How do you get on the registry?

The wind blows in a different direction; you ask for help for your child; lack of health care, someone does not like the way you look, the chicken crossed the road, you are disabled, your child is disabled, lack of education, or, you could just be part of the targeted population of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth). There are no civil rights in child welfare.

Commit a crime against a child. Or, have your parental rights to a child terminated for abuse or neglect. In other cases, a CPS worker, in consultation with a supervisor, can place someone on the registry after finding evidence of abuse or neglect. The subject can seek a review by an administrative law judge, whose ruling can be appealed to circuit court.

Wrong. You have to hail from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) Title IV-A criteria for funding. If, in fact, someone does commit a crime, other than being poor because poverty is considered the crime of abuse and neglect for "failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child", that individual is tried, in a court of law as being innocent until proven guilty.  In child welfare proceedings, you are guilty until proven innocent.

As for seeking a review by an administrative law judge, there are no constitutionalities in administrative law. For example, you can be denied expunction from the Central Registry for the simple fact that you were placed on the Central Registry.  Seriously, and I can prove it.  Just ask Steve Yager.

"There's a checks-and-balances system in place," Rachael Wineland, Child Protective Services policy analyst, told MLive/The Grand Rapids Press at her Lansing office.

Rachael Wineland is a damn lie, either that or she is just stupid and needs to be removed from her position for interfering in federal and state investigations.

Why does Michigan have the Central Registry?

Consider it as the ship's property manifest of the UCC Children's Trust Fund.

It's mandated by the state and federal government, though registries differ by state. It's intended to protect children from those whose neglect or abuse of a child did not rise to the criminal level.

There goes that legal assertion of the 13th Amendment Exception Clause. If someone committed a crime that rose to the level of an adult, there would be due process and conviction, removing the need for the database.

Assistant Attorney General Kristin Heyse said the state "has a strong interest in ensuring the safety of children and protecting children. In fact, it is well established that both the safety and the protecting of children are compelling state interests."

NOTE TO SELF: FILE AN ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE ON KRISTIN HEYSE FOR LYING AND COVERING UP KIDS IN FOSTER CARE WHO HAVE BEEN DRUGGED AS LAB RATS, RAPED, TORTURED, MURDERED, ATTEMPTED SUICIDE AND WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMMITTED SUICIDE.

The compelling state interest is to maximize revenue because these actions of Child Protective Services are carried out through private contracts and the parties on the Central Registry cannot afford an attorney nor will the Attorney General intervene as there is that inherent conflict of interest in having to contemporaneously prosecute and represent the privatized agency.

Besides, "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) cannot afford an attorney, let alone find one competent or gutsy enough to jeopardize their legal career taking on cases as this.

Kristin probably has no clue about the functions of the Foster Care Review Board.

What do critics say?

The Central Registry is a human trafficking database.

It is also a foreign operation.

The registry is easy to get on, difficult to get off. The threshold to substantiate abuse or neglect - preponderance of evidence - is far less than beyond a reasonable doubt, required for a criminal conviction.

There is no due process. Period.

"It is my impression from having handled these expunction cases for years, that many people do not know about the Central Registry - this is true for the general public and those involved in the child-welfare system," said Paula Aylward, a Marshall attorney who specializes in family law.

See, you are supposed to be notified that you are on the Central Registry, but they never do.  You are placed on the Central Registry immediately upon an anonymous call to CPS. Sex offenders get treated better than parents in poverty.

Some have been informed they were on the registry after being denied employment working with children. The law has changed requiring notification.

Yes, that is correct.  You can be denied employment, housing, education, even your own kids.  I consider it a legal verification of being an original source.

Lansing attorney Cassandra Drysdale-Crown said the registry gives CPS workers too much power.

Power? Nah. Pro forma.

"They're making a determination based on maybe an hour interview, maybe,  that somebody is a substantial risk of future harm of abuse and neglect."

Interview? Some people get interviews before being placed on the Central Registry? Wow. Lucky them.

She was also critical of a computer system that assigns points to determine placement on the registry.

She is referring to SACWIS, which sucks, badly, really badly, which is why I call the Central Registry the database of Medicaid fraud in child welfare.

"What other process in our entire country can totally destroy so many fundamental liberties with an arbitrary computer program? CPS would lead you to believe that everybody on Central Registry has been found guilty of something."

They have been found guilty of being one with "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) due to that pesky 13th Amendment Exception. 

No money, no justice.

Where can you see the registry?

It is not public. Only certain organizations and employers can gain access to results by submitting a name to the state.

It is called privatization of trafficking tiny humans for the purposes of covering up a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Michigan Medicaid Targeted Population Cost Reimbursed Self Sufficiency Workforce Training Revenue Maximization & Asset Forfeiture Model

Whoever said the 13th Amendment abolished indentured servitude or slavery lied.

There is the exception of being duly convicted of a crime, where poverty, is codified in Michigan as a crime.

Michigan Peter Lucindo Sucks & The 13th Exception

In our next exciting adventure into the national policy diffusion of  asset forfeiture model through an
access to health care model from"The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth), Medicaid, we have Michigan in play.

Michigan Medicaid Targeted Population Cost Reimbursed Self Sufficiency Workforce Training Revenue Maximization Model

It is about time we stop labeling people.  Seriously.  Stop it.  We have the technology to make it end.

I have no problems with generating opportunity for individuals to participate and flourish in society, however they ultimately decide; it is the lack of opportunity to discuss, or at least identify the doctrine of cui bono?"

Who benefits?  The Public Private Partnerships or the individual?

Michigan, being the privatization think tank of the nation, has been pushing the proverbial envelop on targeted populations, the formal term for Medicaid revenue maximization.

How to find a Medicaid revenue maximization free labor workforce.

 "ABLE-BODIED ADULT" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL AT LEAST 18 YEARS OF AGE WHO IS PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY CAPABLE OF WORKING.

Who determines the boundaries for meeting the criteria of able-bodied adult?

Is this an GAL model?

Is this the Shared Parenting model, where Jim Runestad refuses to address anything to do with the State sharing parenting through the current child welfare model in Michigan.

What does "capable of working" mean?

Is this the new low wage manufacturing workforce, human currency, with the hourly wages paid through Medicaid, as life self-sufficiency training through social impact bonds, of course.

Does this mean the "able-bodied adult" who is capable of working will have to work off the Medicaid debt for being previously classified as disabled, having received benefits, considering the disability criteria is about to change.

If this is the case, then we have ourselves asset forfeiture of the trust funds because every corporation should hire a child.

Well, actually, these Privateers really did want to convert children into its new workforce and even attempted to change child labor laws, but it did not go over so well.

So, what they did was start to change the entire concept of disability to include age, or rather, children.

This is an Industrial Organizational predictive analytical model to maximize revenues and seize assets.

Someone is going to make a whole bunch of money off this population of chattel through social impact bonds.

I am quite sure there will be those highly sought after, lucrative database, third party contractors who will eventually sell off our data and intellectual property.

Why would there be a penalty provision of stripping one of opportunity to medical access if there is a procedural error?

Michigan House Introduced Bill 5716 Medicaid Work Requirement 2018 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Whether you like it or not, I am going to make the world go blockchain. 

That way, if someone suspects you of stealin', we can trace it right back to the original mines the copper for the pennies you got by filing false claims for fraudulent cost reimbursements.

Oh, and if your programs suck, you will be shuttered, immediately because the world will know.

That is how you start building procurement policies.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DOJ and HHS Finally Team Up To Address Civil Rights Violations In Child Welfare

Well, it is about damn time!

The U.S. Department of Justice has teamed up with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to offer joint guidance into civil rights violations in child welfare.

Child Welfare:  The Residuals of the Peculiar Institution

Why, you may inquire?

Well, because there are no civil rights in child welfare. 

"So, why are there no civil rights in child welfare?", is the next logical query.

  

The answer is quite simple because the child welfare system is a residual of the peculiar institution, devoid of any feasibly constructed oversight.

Of course, there are those who will quickly defend the entire child welfare industry, but steadfast as they are, they fail to disclose their financial and political conflicts of interest for personal inurement, which is currently another scope of investigation of the U.S. Department of Justice.

An action, or inaction, of a civil rights violation, is even more egregious when it is perpetrated through the use of federal funds, in order to maximize revenues, in the name of God.

As these child welfare organizations are classified as nonprofits, many Christian, everyone knows that...say it with me..."you cannot audit God."

This means that the iron curtain of child welfare has been impenetrable since its Emancipation Proclamation inception.

This now begs the question, "How are the DOJ and HHS to investigate alleged civil rights violations in child welfare when the databases do not have mandated reported variables?"

The University of Michigan Law School has a civil rights database.

The Department of Education has a civil rights database.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children & Families has a National Youth in Transition Database.

But there is no database on civil rights violations of children and families involved in the child welfare system.

There is not even an exclusionary database of child welfare organizations which have been found to engage in questionable billing practices in dealing with Medicaid, Title IV-B or IV-E.

Here we have U.S. Representative John Conyers speaking upon H.R. 40, a Bill to establish a commission to study the "residuals of the peculiar institution", affectionately misunderstood, as the Reparations Bill.

The study is to address the history of the means and ways of why and how the U.S. has ignored the civil rights (including human rights) violations of the poor but it must be inclusive of all targeted populations.

Only the poor are eligible for the programs in which this joint federal partnership is investigating; therefore, the only way to payback for the social assistance, where being impoverished is statutorily considered moral turpitude, is to lose one's children through termination of parental rights, the edifice of the 13th Amendment.

Canada issued a formal apology on how it has treated aboriginal children and families and did not even have slavery, but not the U.S.

This letter of guidance should be considered more along the lines of a notice of intent.

There are other areas of awakening within the DOJ and HHS, but the work will be slow and arduous as there are many, many, powerful players who do not want a single thing to change.

To my #Superfans ... you know where to find me.

Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services Issue Joint Guidance for Child Welfare Systems by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Here is the guidance for the DOJ and HHS.

Who knows, perhaps one day when the U.S. admits child welfare has no civil rights, it will finally agree to sign on.

U,N. Convention on the Rights of the Child by Beverly Tran on Scribd

If you believe you or a child's civil rights have been violated, file up with your stories.

Information about filing a Title VI complaint with DOJ can be found at www.justice.gov/crt/howfile-complaint.

Individuals who believe they have been aggrieved under Title VI should file complaints at the earliest opportunity. You can also file a Title VI complaint with OCR at www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/complaints/index.html.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Corporations Have Parental Rights

Did you ever wonder why no one wants to talk about the residuals of the peculiar institution?

Well, it is because of child welfare.

Yes, that is correct.

Not only are children still statutorily codified as property, or rather chattel, but the 13th Amendment made sure that the best financial interests of the child were placed under the parental rights of corporations.

Yes, that is correct, corporations have parental rights.

Commercial Surrogacy: the new term for saying:
"Trafficking Tiny Humans"

According to investopedia, a parent company is:

What is a 'Parent Company'

A parent company is a company that controls other, smaller businesses by owning an influential amount of voting stock or control. Parent companies are typically larger firms that exhibit control over one or more small subsidiaries in either the same industry or complimentary industries. Parent companies can be either hands-on or hands-off with subsidiaries, depending on the amount of managerial control given to subsidiary managers.

BREAKING DOWN 'Parent Company'

A parent company is a larger corporation that has significant ownership over a subsidiary or group of subsidiaries. These partially or wholly-owned smaller companies are controlled by the parent, to varying degrees; however, all parent companies, for the most part, own more than 50% of a subsidiary's voting stock.

There is a new phenomenon called commercial surrogacy.

So, what exactly is commercial surrogacy?

According to surrogacy.com, defines commercial surrogacy as such:

Commercial surrogacy refers to any surrogacy arrangement in which the surrogate mother is compensated for her services beyond reimbursement of medical expenses.

The corporate surrogate parent model is currently being implemented on the state level as seen in the EPIC Foundation.

From 2004 to the present The EPIC Foundation has collaborated with the Hawaii State Department of Education in training and appointing Surrogate Parents to eligible children. Surrogate parents ensure that eligible children receive an education comparable to children without disabilities in all matters pertaining to their identification, evaluation, and educational program placement. The Surrogate Parent Program was established by the Hawaii State Department of Education to ensure proper representation and services for children with disabilities as mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) and Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (amended by the Rehabilitation From 2004 to the present The EPIC Foundation has collaborated with the Hawaii State Department of Education in training and appointing Surrogate Parents to eligible children. Surrogate parents ensure that eligible children receive an education comparable to children without disabilities in all matters pertaining to their identification, evaluation, and educational program placement.

Eligible Children are those:

• Whose parents cannot be identified.

• Whose parents cannot be located

• Who are wards of the state under the laws of the state

• Those considered to be unaccompanied youth as stated under the Stewart B. McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act

• That have no relative willing and able to serve as an educational representative for a student who has reasched the age of majority and lacks decisional capacity to provide informed consent.

According to beverlytran.com, commercial surrogacy is defined as  as such: The trafficking of tiny humans because every corporation should hire a child.

As seen here, corporations have parent disclosures but individuals do not, according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures.

According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 7.1, a Corporate Parent Disclosure Statement is:

(a) Who Must File; Contents. A nongovernmental corporate party must file 2 copies of a disclosure statement that:
(1) identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock; or
(2) states that there is no such corporation.

Individuals are granted the rights of custodianship and guardianship, where the parent disclosure is conferred upon the States Attorney General, by United States Code, 15 U.S.C. 15(c):

Any attorney general of a State may bring a civil action in the name of such State, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in such State, in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the defendant, to secure monetary relief as provided in this section for injury sustained by such natural persons to their property by reason of any violation of sections 1 to 7 of this title. The court shall exclude from the amount of monetary relief awarded in such action any amount of monetary relief (A) which duplicates amounts which have been awarded for the same injury, or (B) which is properly allocable to (i) natural persons who have excluded their claims pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of this section, and (ii) any business entity.

The "crime" for which the States Attorney General may bring forth on behalf of the Corporation of the State is now the crime of poverty, which is manifests itself in the form of asset forfeiture policies through privatization.

STATE CONSTITUTION (EXCERPT) CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1963 § 9

Slavery and involuntary servitude. Sec. 9. Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state. History: Const. 1963, Art. I, § 9, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964. Former constitution: See Const. 1908, Art. II, § 8.

Oh, but involuntary servitude is tolerated in Michigan, under Child Protection Laws, as "failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child" is poverty, which is abuse and neglect, grounds for a trustee corporation to state the "best interests of the child".

As we see the progression of the parental rights of corporations, policies are now being diffused across the nation, in those pilot model states, by amending language to include the terms "children" and"seniors" into term, "disabled", then creating and promoting a new nomenclature for chattel law, or rather "personhood".

So, if an individual must rely upon any form of social assistance, seen the mandatory Medicaid work requirement, the state assigns "custodianship & guardianship" to privatized contractors through case management, probably better understood as a Micro Emergency Manager of the trust fund.

The trust fund, in this instance is the Social Security Trust Fund, where corporations have parental rights seize these "assets" to for providing services to "The Poors", or rather the disabled.

Think about this policy as a new form of indentured servitude, but there is nothing worded in these new state laws where a time period, like the traditional seven years indenturtude or working off one's debt releases one from the default transfer to the privatized corporation.


MICHIGAN GENERAL CORPORATION STATUTE (EXCERPT)
Act 327 of 1931

450.157 Trustee corporation; hospitals; asylums; trustee instrument; indenturing or apprenticing destitute or foundling;children; withdrawal.

Sec. 157.

(1) In all cases where lands, or any other property, amounting in value to $5,000.00 or more, have been or are given, granted, devised, or bequeathed to 3 or more trustees for the purpose of founding or endowing a hospital or other charitable asylum for the care or relief of indigent or other sick or infirm or aged persons, or the care of minor orphans or children and youth with special health care needs or for the care and protection of unfortunate women, or any number of those purposes, the trustees may incorporate under this act as a trustee corporation. Unless restricted by the trust instrument, the trustees may unite in that incorporation with other persons contributing to the maintenance of the hospital or asylum, and all of those other persons shall become members of the corporation upon making the contribution as may be fixed and determined in the articles or by-laws of the corporation. However, any 3 or more persons may incorporate for any charitable purpose described in this subsection as a trustee corporation, where the hospital, home, asylum, or other institution to be founded by the corporation is to be constructed, equipped, and maintained principally by donations not made under any trust deed or other instrument in writing declaring the uses and purposes to which the property shall be devoted, and that corporation shall have authority to fix and prescribe the terms and conditions of membership in the corporation.

(2) The trustees of a trustee corporation described in subsection (1), or a majority of them, are hereby authorized and empowered to indenture or apprentice to responsible persons, any destitute or foundling children who now or later become under the charge or care of that corporation, until those children shall respectively become of lawful age, and to make that indenture in each case as binding and effective in all respects as if the trustees were the lawful parents or guardians of those children. However, the trustees shall have power to withdraw a child from any person to which he or she is indentured, when in their opinion the interests of the child require it.

History: 1931, Act 327, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;-- CL 1948, 450.157 ;-- Am. 2015, Act 89, Imd. Eff. June 25, 2015
Compiler's Notes: The catchline following the act section number was incorporated as part of the section when the act was enacted.
Former Law: See section 10 of Ch. I of Part IV of Act 84 of 1921, being CL 1929, § 10086; and section 11 of Ch. I of Part IV of Act 84 of 1921, being CL 1929, § 10087.

So, now you know why corporations have parental rights.

An Examination of Foster Care in the United States and the Use of Privatization by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Our Most Precious Treasures Are Finally Being Protected: FinCEN & Egmont Group

Children are our most precious treasures.

It is my belief they are going to set up an international whistleblower institution, run this through financial intelligence networks of, eventually, blockchain, prosecute and recovery through the International Court of Crimes in a conjugal collaborative network with international genus taxonomies in international, national, state and local governments using AI.

HA!

You nasty little Meanies think you can run that predictive modeling with your dirty data that the people cannot even FOIA, to run these highly sophisticated financial privatized fraud schemes to keep stealing children, the land, the vote?

Well, guess what, it looks like the whistleblowers are now the experts and we are re-setting the global.

Allow me to introduce you to the Egmont Group.

Financial Intelligence Groups

Corruption is a global plague that seriously undermines development, diverting resources that could be harnessed to finance development, damaging the quality of governance institutions, and threatening human security. Increasingly, corruption related crimes appear in the statistics of FIUs and of law enforcement agencies, as a major category of predicate offences. Effective anti-money laundering systems have the potential to pose a significant barrier to the possibility of perpetrators of corruption-related offences enjoying the proceeds of corruption, or indeed laundering the bribe itself. 

The FIU is an important element in the AML regime, particularly in the early, pre-investigative or intelligence gathering stage, where the FIU acts as an interface between the private sector and law enforcement agencies, assisting with the flow of relevant financial information. Fighting cross-border corruption requires close and timely international cooperation. FIUs can bring added value to this process from the advantages of existing and well-established information exchange mechanisms developed by the Egmont Group.

Edmont Group is the international institution to newtork to stop financial fraud, and it is even incorporated.

We are supposed to invest in the best interest of the child to garner the future returns of a productive member of society.

The time has come to dismantle the peculiar institution because it was never abolished through the execption clause of the 13th Amendment.

The law of chattels is still the law of the land and these privateers highjacked the legal institutions to rewrite the law to maximize their revenues for their tax exempt god.

History is cyclical where there always comes a time the people will awaken to understand that we are the ones with authority to redress grievance and challenge authority, but now, we have the skills to find your deepest, darkest, black hearted financial harbors where you keep the interests from our most precious treasures, our children, for no other purpose than to make sure you can keep on profiting from the trafficking of tiny humans.

All Hail The FBI Whistleblowers!!!!

Qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur,

Consider we, the whistleblowers as those with on the job expertise, which makes us the final arbitors of whether you suck or not.

I highly respect Defango for just doing it.

The U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Strategic Plan is about to expire.

This means there is going to be new legislation, new technologies, new networks so we can report fraud at anytime, any where.

This means there will be even more conjugal collaborations with a new Public-Public Partnership.  (I am ripping on the entire oxymoronic concept of Public-Private Partnerships, which is nothing but a fancy name for stealin' through Bills of Attainders.)

Much love to Jennifer Shasky Calvery, FinCEN Director, and the crew.

But wait, it seems there is a new director, Kenneth Blanco.  The plot thickens, he has some skills and sounds like he could be an original source coming out of Florida's Attorney General's Office. 

Stay tuned.

To officially lauch the festivities, I have so graciously provided my lil launder list of sectors of importance for the 2019 and beyone, institutional tenats construciton phase:

1. Child Welfare Law
2. Property Law
3. Technology Law
4. Campaign Finance Law

There! I kept under 5 bullet points.  I hope my Sweetie is proud.

They are going after the political camaigns because they are corporations and were granted financial instruments by the banks.



TRANSLATION: In the financial sector, if it sucks, and you do not let anyone know it sucks, then you suck, too and will be prosecuted.



TRANSLATION: #Time2AuditGod

These NGOs operate under the color of law by and through governmental institutions to steal the children, the land and the vote, then turn around and leverage the booty to invest in their dark and nasty games of war.



The banks operating as Anti-Money Laundering (AML) for the fake NGOs and unincorporated  business organizations like the Detroit Land Bank Authority stealing TARP, will be prosecuted for authorizing and issuing fraudulent financial instruments with non-existent instuments of authority, using a governmental institution as a front.

This means the banks are filing fraudulent tax information, which is intentional manipulation of the public record, to compromise voting members either through blackmail or guise.

This is why we must protect our most precious treasures.



They have monetized our births and deaths through the certificates using the law of chattels in intellectual property.

Stay tuned.

On a mission...

U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Strategic Plan 2014-2018 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

The Role of Financial Intelligence Units in Fighting Corruption and Asset Recovery An Egmont Group White Pa... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Again, the moral of the story is, "Do not be mean to my Sweetie.  Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Emancipation Proclamation On View At Henry Ford Museum

If anyone remembers, there was the reading of the U.S. Constitution on the floor of the House of Representatives.  This was a selective reading of one of the most powerful documents in the world, where the elected majority, touted a denial of history by omitting the sections of slavery.

The Emancipation Proclamation was the beginning of the civil rights movement with civil rights being the rights to a promulgate a civil society.  We have not only forgotten what civility is, but the concept of peace.

The Henry Ford Museum, Dearborn, Michigan, is allowing the opportunity for anyone and everyone to view the original Emancipation Proclamation for free.  The "Discovering the Civil War" event is open to the public for a continuous 36 hours, until 6:00 a.m., June 22, 2011, on loan from the National Archives,

"Only in a democracy can you get this reevaluation of history," U.S. Rep. John Conyers told FOX 2.


For those who may not be able to view the documents up front and personal, here is one of the posters that was sent out throughout the States during the Civil War.

Also on view is the original draft of the 13th Amendment.

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The Emancipation Proclamation exists as a constant reminder of the magnanimous powers of the Constitution and should be read in tangent with the Original Parchment, as a living, breathing reminder of what we should never allow our elected leaders to ever forget that the original intent was to develop a civil society of peace, where all men were created equal.

Article I. Section. 9.

Clause 1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person. 

Article I. Section 2. Paragraph 3.


Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

This is the original parental rights doctrine, the preservation of the family.