JUDICIARY: VAWA Reauthorization Hearing - Jolly Jerry Forgets Truth In Testimony, ICWA, TPR & Its Legacy - My Colored Commentary

U.S. Representative Cedric Richmond is the first elected official to state "Termination of Parental Rights" into the congressional record of Judiciary.

A quick overview on the history of VAWA.

The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security will hold a hearing on the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which officially expired on September 30, 2018, but was briefly extended in continuing resolutions before expiring in December 2018. The hearing will examine the broad range of issues related to the harms inflicted upon women, men, and children in America through domestic violence, sexual assault and harassment, dating violence, and stalking, as well as Congress’ role in addressing these issues. The hearing will also explore the potentially devastating effect of not reauthorizing VAWA, and the tremendous impact a prolonged lack of funding could have on millions of survivors across the country.

Ratcliffe spoke in defense of Faith Based organizations being left out of the reauthorization of VAWA.  He raised the political partisanship in passing the extension.

No mention of CPS, foster care or adoption, but Julie Beck spoke about the Lesbian Powers of the LBQRSTUV Community in gender identity laws without broaching anything DNA database related.

She spoke about child sexual abuse.

Unfortunately, there was no one to properly expound upon the gender identity laws under chattel law, more intuitively known in the legal world as Ecclesiastical Law, which is being pushed through Public Private Partnerships in the rebranding of parental rights and the children's trust funds.

Fathers have been victims of VAWA in the layers of fraudulent billing in child support and child welfare programs, where there have been instances where a man identified as an aggressor strictly for the purposes of a mother obtaining services.

Yes, you have to check the box in order to access help.

Yes, the VAWA programs are crap, riddled with fraud, which brings a judicial determination to turn on the federal funding spigot for Targeted Case Management, Medicaid fraud.

Ramona Gonzales did speak of children being removed, without saying foster care, if there is a domestic violence situation which is why the national data of child abuse and neglect are corrupt.

Sarah Deer spoke of Native Tribes inability of prosecuting non tribal members or even crimes of child abuse and against women.

Odd how she never mentioned the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) or its history of how the tribal constitutions developed, who was behind it, and the tribal exile based upon the blood quantum rule, as opposed to the one-drop rule.

It is time to address, in formal hearings, ICWA and all the covert "military" operations, including drug, child trafficking and money laundering on the reservations.

Gohmert got raw by asking the LBQRSTUV Lesbian why women must have "women only spaces" by loosely comparing it to "blacks only spaces". She responded by saying, "if women could experience these women only spaces, they will see how wonderful it is."  I would suggest she spend time in a women's only prison or go help mothers who have had their children legally kidnapped get them back.

Gohmert just brought up female genital mutilation as a violence against women, carefully guiding to the fact that it happens to girls, not women.

Richmond spoke on Termination of Parental Rights, as one of his first cases out of law school. No one has ever spoken upon this before.  He also mentioned CASA.  He made history.

Lieu spoke upon lack of resources for domestic violence survivors, homelessness, poverty, etc.  On a side note, your children can and will be removed, placed in foster care, under VAWA if you hail from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

How to stop discrimination and increase to access to domestic violence services for LBQRSTUV individuals: report fraud!

Yes, many Faith Based private contractors will not only turn their noses up at a LBQRSTUV individual seeking help, they will advocate termination of parental rights if there is a child involved.  Take for instance any christian child placing agency, perhaps, I shall use Bethany Christian Services, which is notorious for ignoring its foster children who are gay and ask for help from being raped.

Perhaps, we can go as far back as St. Vincent Sarah Fisher Residential Institution who never wanted to do anything when it came to little boys being raped by bigger boys, or men, because, homosexuality is frowned upon in self reporting to DHHS, which is why the typical form of help is to drug the pain away with Medicaid cost reimbursed services and  testing second generation antipsychotropic human subject lab rats for corporate sponsorship.

Heck, Faith Based child placing agencies will not even allow LBQRSTUV to adopt.

Grand Rapids does not allow LBQRSTUV youth into its homeless shelters, but I digress.

VAWA has turned into a Social Impact Bond experimental social services program and not a reparative response to the residuals of the peculiar institution, its original intent, a step to end human trafficking of women.

It seems Jolly Jerry of Judiciary forgot the Truth in Testimony, the bios, and legacy of VAWA, but then again, he was probably more focused on his impeachment proceedings because not everyone is allowed due process of the law, right?

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

JUDICIARY: Full Committee Hearing on H.R. 5, the "Equal Act" - RFRA v. LBQRSTUV - Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month

The following is a snapshot in time of the discussion chat during the hearing.

I have chosen not to identify the posters as it will be much more fun to figure out which comments are my own.

As this is the prelude to parental rights, I thought it only proper to do it in one of my genres of choice,, in the spirit of Da Dialetica, with a side of spicy dipping sauce.

This is about Medicaid fraud in child welfare, but Judiciary will not tell you that, being all busy trying to find out what is in the Mueller Report, and all.

Enjoy the pretty man looking over everyone's right shoulder.

Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month!

FUN FACT! DNA & RNA have no gender phenotype,

 Now, they are talking about "trans" kids and sports....yet nothing about kids being trafficked through these Title IX programs from overseas. Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.........

 Oh my, Judiciary is talking "gender identity" medical stuff in winning races. Weeeeeeeeeeeee...... I propose a bill to prove your sexual orientation by submitting video evidence to the courts,

Aw man, you seriously want to drag the Dark Web into this realm? There are things you can't unsee...removing eyes doesn't help and neither does injecting bleach into the brain. Think we only have 52 genders now?

I hate to even consider what may be there...... Collins is talking about the sports doctors administrating hormone injections when needed to kids.

They are talking about child protection. How about stop labeling and love the body you were given?

 This is covering up the epigenetic research they do on kids.

Zoe is asking the pastor for Southern Baptist take on LBQRSTUV. Ok, I guess I have to take a tally of how many times they drop MLK. We are up to 2. The reverend spoke of race and sex being the same....through a story of a story that was told to him by his daddy about MLK.

Gender Identity Disorder?

How about just letting someone be what they want instead of forcing labels...that they use for predictive modeling crap..

The prefrontal cortex for decision making and critical thinking skills ...isn't fully developed in children. And To alter them with hormones before 18, is child abuse.

 They are talking about using kids for T-level research.

SERIOUSLY This is that superhuman research cover up. https://www.synthego.com/blog/could-crispr-make-x-men-a-realistic-possibility?fbclid=IwAR1dW2HWHUBqL7z-OWe96yLJopIzQbhaOAK17jVllH0U2_hhZGkykSTD-6Q

 Oh don't get me started on the threats CRISPR poses.....screw superpowers.....let's talk cascade effect from altering just one gene......they have NO clue exactly what they are doing. To a large degree they have a very basic understanding but long term....no way.

 Gohmert says, "Only women carry children".. Well that is not true. We can produce humans outside the womb. HA! 46th allelal default

To possess is to own as it's cargo when you breech the waters of birth...

 Faith Based is going to lose money if they accept LBQRSTUV. I told you. This is about chattel law. Property law is gender specific.

 Hakeem did not talk about pregnancy discrimination.

 I got another gender discrimination issue. Child Support, Title IVD is a male program. 

OOOOOOOOOOOOO Nadler is getting feisty He’s very nervous! He won’t allow anything that hurts HIS defense! He has his crew in his office coordinating responses with HQ. I am waiting to see if he calls for bathroom breaks to go get coaching from #perkinscoiesucks They are using RFRA as a reason to stop the LBQRSTUV.

ALL of the earmarks are being hit for this hearing to open the door for trafficking tiny humans. McClintock rocked by asking why society regulates who people should dress and act.

This is the second congressional testimony from this chick. I have to find her name. Do you know the likelihood of one person being the go to person on a subject matter? This is personal for her, not for humanity. Ha! That’s right mr McClintock—the questions are coming in a way that don’t makes sense but it does if you want to shape a defense.

 Raskin is naming great members of Judiciary who have stood up for civil rights....but fails to name the one man he used to follow around like a puppy dog.

 Raskin says this will help children in adoption. Huh?

 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Tandy?fbclid=IwAR3BPWXgO_Cbphvq14AFSW6PMsHsNi4s7mrJOGP6hIrNYNCZODQrPk2nEiQ 

Raskin is pushing adoption. I will thrash him. Listen to him talking about child placement.

 moral discovery?? Whew Raskin is pushing foster care. I want to jump through my computer and smack him for pushing adoption. That’s my local DA’s mentor who is pushing for juvenile court- at this point I don’t think I could recognize what a normal justice system would look like We just took our 6th grader out of public school- she couldn’t take constantly being confronted about her “preferred pronoun” by teachers- it was really f’ing with her head- she said to us “ I have the right to be a kid!” -way too young for this - it’s morphed into calling a boy who wants to be called her a he = hate speech GMAFB

 There are only 2 genders. Asshole and Non-asshole. The spirit has no gender. The US is a very dumb nation.

 Keep dropping your hearfilled comments and observations. I will be doing a full report on the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) hearing. I already tweeted so they know it is coming. I like to watch them in my stats. MLK mentions tally update: 7

 does she mean her daughter is or is not gay? Nonconformist? Neutrality All of this is so ironic, how they love to hear themselves , investigate each other etc- and never accountable for what they profit from- meanwhile there’s barely a shred of justice, understanding or sympathy for people at your local court house🙄 Not boys vs. girls....thems vs. thems these days.

All these protected classes do it lead to discrimination against others. The Constitution is very clear....equal protection under the laws. I think she’s admitting she’s clueless I think there are two shows playing simultaneously.

The boys vs girls are the hidden ones. Front and center are the thems vs thems/those. Nonconformists vs traditionalists

 Jayapal is crying because she only found out 2 years ago that her 22 year old son was gay. She is a horrible mother.....or just really dumb. It is your child! You know before they can talk and walk.

Why is she crying, like she is embarrassed? It will not stop. These witnesses are begging for HBCU protections. HBCUs have to stop stealin' first.

 Her Flatulent Boviness expels words from her mouth...... Interesting....someone in the chat mentioned Lupron being used as a hormone blocker in kids and reminded folks it is a pallative prostate cancer med.

 Kiddy lab rats Start preaching. Epigenetics

 Even throwing out Nazis! Geesch! I told you.....#coloredrevolution Does no one understand "equal protections?" Get rid of protected classes because that is biased and racist and anti-american. I don't see "the poors" getting such elaborate protections.

Not even close. This hearing was set up to push NLP in the re-engineering of child welfare. That chick is the "go-to" gal to push propaganda for profit because she is highly deficient in any legal basis of chattel law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

TEFRA: The Latest Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Trust Fund Battle - Who Will Control The Industry of Trafficking Tiny Humans - Nessel v. Engler

Today, I was tip toeing through the FinCEN trying to figure the next, latest and greatest stealin' op of the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) when I found a lovely growth of financial intel called the cross border transfer from the originator to the beneficiary, and said to myself,

"Hey, Self! You know what that sounds like? It sounds like one of those trafficking tiny humans mechanisms."

"Well, golly geeze, who would have ever thought about transposing international financial law enforcement models over to the privatized industry of trafficking tiny humans?"

"Me, Silly!"

So, there you have it, I found TEFRA:

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982

TEFRA, as it is called, has lots and lots of asset forfeiture models for civil debt and liquidity for child support, disabled children, children and their families living in poverty, the elderly, and the lot.

That is when I figured out that this was the introduction to that "targeted population" era.

TEFRA talks about the transfer of bonds from the originator to the beneficiary in the form of trusts, children's trust funds.

It was at this point I said, "Corporate Parental Rights!"

I found the originator of the Public Private Partnership they are repurposing for civil asset forfeiture in the transfer of the grant to the right of the incapacitated person, having a diffusion of lumping children, disabled and elderly, into the category of not being legally capable to represent themselves in legal matters, therefore must be put under a Guardian Ad Litem for one of these privatized, foreign corporations to take legal custody of the trust, being the Medicaid funding, and any other inheritances, because the corporate parent becomes the beneficiary.

The rebranding of child welfare.

I know, I need to do a LK production on this.

This is why there is a push to become gender neutral.

Gender neutral in law allows for easier transfers of funds under chattel law.

Chattel law is heirarchial when it comes to gender in property ownership.

Think of it like this, instead of a marriage, you have a corporate partnership, with newly defined corporate parental rights through TEFRA in mergers and acquisitions, or rather, adoption.

Yes, it still exists today, but I see the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) taking this into maritime law, because we are dealing with foreign corporations in partnership with our federal, state and local governments.

partnership by on Scribd

Yes, the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) are rolling out the 2019 Stealin' Model for Medicaid fraud in child welfare.

Behold, the first thing that popped up when I did a basic term search on TEFRA:

https://humanservices.arkansas.gov/about-dhs/dms/tefra

https://afmc.org/individuals/arkansans-on-medicaid/beneficiary-education/tefra-webinar-feb2019/

These are Medicaid funded private children's trusts models, which have no gender, under TEFRA.

This is being diffused across the nation as corporate parental rights, where the corporation is the beneficiary and the state is the orignator to the trust.

I tell ya, these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) are awfully clever when it comes to stealin'.

The following is the Michigan private, foreign, children's trust funds for wagering.

This is all about the children's trust funds because they get that Medicaid money and leverage it, not providing crap to the people who need it, for the purposes of maximizing revenues.

Seriously.

So, now that we know the purpose of the LBQRSTUV #coloredrevolution propaganda; they want in on the children's trust funds and they are privatizing the justice system for "The Poors" by rebranding child welfare, through databases and technologies, to implement their Targeted Case Management programs under the new Families First Act, through TEFRA.

This is about the christian chattel law model being outdated, when it comes to parental rights, under the legal property ownership concepts in gender, only.

There is nothing in Ecclessiastical law which recognizes same sex marriages, as the many subjects of wifery are still on the books under the Mann Act and Immigration and Naturalization Act.

It has nothing to do with one's genotype or phenotype, it has to do with the beneficiary of the trust, the ownership of the intellectual property.

Corporations have no gender; ergo, do not produce its goods, but acquire, through the transfer of parental rights from the host, the new name for mother.

The LBQRSTUV narrative is just a cover for the genetic research industry of manufacturing tiny humans, because humans are being produced outside a human host and it not very easy to assign gender to parental protein strands.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, a foreign corporation, has a corner on the market when it comes to the child welfare industry.

The LBQRSTUV community wants in on the skins because the Pro Lifers have been running the show.

Nothing more.  Nothing less.  It is about the children's trust funds in the trafficking of tiny humans, which is why we are circling in on the use of policy of a private, foreign corporation.

Since all this started in Michigan, this boils down to nothing but a battle between "The Boys" v. "The Girls" on who controls the rebranding of parental rights in child welfare.

Child welfare is chattel law under the Vatican, "Virgin of the Sea", so I see this as a simple battle of corporate privateers taking over the industry, with these very same questions lingering in SCOTUS in DACA/DAPA actions.

Who owns the child, under what jurisdiction, under what laws, under what authority, under what rights?

This is going to be very nasty because people do not like it when you snatch their money, but now comes another group that wants in on the Medicaid fraud in child welfare gaming system.

Nessel does not want to talk about trafficking tiny humans in Michigan, but is willing to confront the John Engler, but not on this subject matter.

We should ask Nessel why she does not want to talk about trafficking tiny humans in Michigan.

Oh, wait....I forgot.

Michigan is still under federal oversight of its child welfare system.

What a situation!

This is what I call an inherently contemporaneous conflict of interests because she cannot advise and advocate at the same time in child welfare, remember?

Michigan will no longer fund adoption agencies that discriminate against gays

Michigan will no longer financially support adoption and foster care agencies that refuse to work with same-sex couples and LGBTQ individuals because of religious beliefs under the terms of a settlement of a lawsuit negotiated by Attorney General Dana Nessel.

The settlement, which was announced Friday, sets up a battle with the Republican-led Legislature, which passed a law in 2015 that allows adoptions agencies to refuse to work with members of the LGBTQ community.

The terms of the settlement require that the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services agrees to maintain nondiscriminatory provisions in its foster care and adoption agency contracts. It also calls for the department to enforce the nondiscrimination provisions by terminating contracts with agencies that either discriminate against same-sex couples or LGBTQ individuals who would otherwise qualify to become foster or adoptive parents or that refer them to other agencies.

In exchange for the policy, the plaintiffs in the case — Kristy and Dana Dumont of Lansing and Erin and Rebecca Busk-Sutton of Detroit — have agreed to dismiss their claims and pay their own attorney fees and costs.

“We are so happy that for same-sex couples in Michigan who are interested in fostering or adopting, opening their hearts and homes to a child no longer comes with the risk of being subjected to the discrimination we experienced," the Dumonts said in a statement released by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which filed the case on behalf of the couples. "We are hopeful that this will mean more families for children, especially those who have been waiting years for a family to adopt them. And we can’t wait to welcome one of those children into our family.”

In 2015, Republicans in the Michigan Legislature, voting mostly along party lines, passed a controversial bill that allows adoption and foster care agencies to cite religious convictions when refusing to work with same-sex couples who want to adopt  or foster a child.

The two couples filed a lawsuit in 2017 challenging the MDHHS contract with taxpayer-funded and state-contracted foster care and adoption agencies that refused to work with same-sex couples.

More: Nessel's quest for AG's office began on steps of U.S. Supreme Court

More: AG Dana Nessel to reconsider LGBTQ rights protections

The couples said they approached St. Vincent Catholic Charities and Bethany Christian Services to adopt children the agencies had accepted through referrals from MDHHS.  They said the agencies refused to work with them.

It is not found in chattel law.

The state contracts with 59 private adoption and foster care agencies across the state and while the MDHHS wasn't able to say specifically how many don't work with same-sex couples or LGBTQ individuals, 20 of the agencies are affiliated with religious organizations.

After the settlement was announced Friday, the Michigan Catholic Conference, the Lansing-based advocacy agency that serves as the official voice of the Catholic Church in Michigan, tweeted, "The settlement announced today by the Attorney General in the Dumont/Lyon case does nothing to protect the thousands of children in foster care looking for loving homes. As such, it is highly unlikely this is the last chapter of the story."

Lori Windham, an attorney with Becket, a Washington D.C.-based law firm that works on religious freedom cases, said the settlement violates Michigan law that protects religious adoption agencies.

"The Michigan AG and the ACLU are trying to stop the state from working with faith-based adoption agencies," she said in a statement. "The result of that will be tragic. Thousands of children will be kept from finding the loving homes they deserve."

Nessel, the first lesbian to be elected to statewide office in Michigan, is most well-known for her representation of a Madison Heights same-sex couple, a case that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and led to the 2015 decision that legalized same-sex marriage.

During her campaign for attorney general, standing up for the rights of the LGBTQ community was a major theme.

“Discrimination in the provision of foster care case management and adoption services is illegal, no matter the rationale,” Nessel said in a statement. “Limiting the opportunity for a child to be adopted or fostered by a loving home not only goes against the state’s goal of finding a home for every child, it is a direct violation of the contract every child-placing agency enters into with the state.”

The ACLU said the settlement was a victory for the 12,000 children in foster care in Michigan.

“Our children need every family that is willing and able to provide them with a loving home," said Leslie Cooper, deputy director of the ACLU LGBT & HIV Project. "When agencies choose to accept taxpayer dollars to provide public child welfare services, they must put the needs of the children first.”

But the settlement is sure to spark a backlash from Republicans in the Legislature, who argued that businesses, including adoption and foster care agencies, shouldn't be forced to conduct business in a way that violated their moral and religious beliefs.

Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, R-Clarklake, blasted Nessel and the settlement.

“Dana Nessel has shown us that she cares little for the Constitution and even less for the vulnerable population of children in need of forever homes," he said.

"Nessel’s actions make it clear that she sought the office of attorney general to further her own personal political agenda."

He claimed that faith-based adoption agencies will have to stop operating in Michigan because of the lack of taxpayer-funded support.

State Rep. James Lower, R-Cedar Lake, said the decision proves that the Legislature was right when it passed a bill late last year that would allow lawmakers to intervene in any case brought against the state. One of the reasons behind the bill was fear that Nessel would try to undo laws passed by Republicans. That bill was vetoed by former Gov. Rick Snyder.

"I’m just disappointed. This proves our point that the attorney general is unwilling to defend the laws in this state," he said, adding that he's sure the GOP caucus will talk about how to move beyond this one settlement. "We can still request to become a party to cases, but I think this one is over."

Lower wasn't in the Legislature when the original bill passed in 2015, but he said he would have supported it.

"It made sense — the situation puts these agencies in a tough situation because they have been able to refer couples to another agency that is willing to work with same-sex couples," he said. "But now, they'll have to choose to either not to help the kids or violate their religious beliefs."

DNA & RNA have no gender when it comes to corporate parental rights.



ThermoFisher

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Clueless In Michigan: More Trafficking Tiny Humans Lawsuits - Will St. Vincent Sarah & Bethany Christian Move To Enjoin To Nancy Edmunds' Court?

If St. Vincent and Bethany Christian can sue Michigan over new gay adoption rules, well, by golly, Michigan can sue St. Vincent and Bethany Christian, and all the other Foster Care & Adoption Agencies for Trafficking Tiny Humans.

It is only logical considering the fact that they are the ones who are trafficking tiny humans.

I wonder if the Michigan GiGi Interlopers, DHHS Robert Gordon and Garlin Gilchrist, will show up, or at least publicly admit that child trafficking is foster care and adoption.

Oh, wait.

I forgot.

Nancy Edmunds is supposed to decide if Michigan is all better when it comes to its child welfare system.

Perhaps, St. Vincent and Bethany Christian can enjoin in the Dwayne B. v. Granholm (now Gretchen Whitmore) action.

Probably not.

Trafficking tiny humans through foster care and adoption is how St. Vincent and Bethany Christian maximizes their revenues.

As for the LBQRSTUV adoption issue, it is just a legal property ownership argument under the law of chattels.

Welcome to Foster Care & Adoption in Michigan, oops, I mean, human trafficking.

Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month!

Adoption agency sues state over new gay adoption rules

Michigan DHHS Director Robert Gordon,
& Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist - Clueless in Michigan

An adoptive mother, a former foster child, and a Michigan faith-based adoption agency are challenging a recent state settlement that bans state contracts with foster and adoption agencies that refuse to work with gay couples.

St. Vincent Catholic Charities, former foster child Shamber Flore, and Melissa Buck, a mother of five special needs kids adopted through St. Vincent, filed a federal lawsuit Monday alleging the new rules violated the group’s First Amendment rights. The agency is represented by religious liberty group, Becket Law.

The lawsuit is filed against Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Director Robert Gordon, Children's Services Agency Director Herman McCall, Attorney General Dana Nessel, the federal Health and Human Services department and its secretary, Alex Azar.

The lawsuit asks the court to issue an injunction on the settlement's provisions that would require the state to stop contracting with agencies that, because of their religious beliefs, refuse to work with same-sex couples.

Nessel's office declined to comment until officials had a chance to review the lawsuit. 

In a Monday statement announcing the lawsuit, Buck, of Holt, said her family still relies on the support of St. Vincent “in every step of our journey together as a family" and could have problems should the family look to adopt siblings of their adopted children through St. Vincent in the future.

“We are hopeful that the courts will step in, do the right thing and allow faith-based agencies to continue to help vulnerable families like mine,” Buck said.

In March, Nessel reached a settlement with the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan and two gay couples who had sued the state when they were rejected by agencies with religious objections to same-sex couples. The agencies were St. Vincent Catholic Charities and Bethany Christian Services.

The settlement required the state Department of Health and Human Services to maintain non-discriminatory provisions in foster care and adoption agency contracts by ending state contracts with agencies if they discriminate against same-sex couples.

Because the settlement was between the state attorney general's department and the ACLU, St. Vincent as an intervenor in the lawsuit had no option but to file a separate action, said Nick Reaves, a lawyer for Becket.

Without the state contract, St. Vincent would be forced to close its doors and the settlement could have a similar effect on "any other organization that shares their religious beliefs," Reaves said. He added that he is not aware of any contracts being dropped so far in light of the March settlement.

“Faith-based agencies like St. Vincent consistently do the best work because of their faith, and we need more agencies like them helping children — not fewer,” Becket President Mark Rienzi said in a statement.

Catholic agencies make up a small portion of the 58 private agencies that contract with the state for adoption and foster care services, proving "there really isn't any access problem" for gay couples seeking an agency through which they can adopt, Reaves said.

For example, in Ingham County, 17 other adoption agencies besides St. Vincent are available to parents seeking to adopt, he said.

Agencies already can refer couples to different adoption agencies for various reasons, including geography, wait lists or a family's search for a specific type of child.

Further, a same-sex couple still can adopt a child within St. Vincent after receiving a home study and becoming a certified pre-adoptive home through a different agency, St. Vincent said in its lawsuit.

Nessel’s office maintained a 2015 law passed by the Republican-led Legislature only protected faith-based agencies that declined to provide services based on religion when it came to “private action.” The protection did not carry over into state-contracted services, she argued.

Such a conclusion is in "serious tension" with previous interpretations of the law and the language of the law itself, Reaves said.

Republican former Attorney General Bill Schuette had defended the state against the ACLU lawsuit when it was filed in 2017. But even before taking office Jan. 1, Nessel had signaled she would not continue to support Schuette's position on the lawsuit.

As of mid-February, St. Vincent and Bethany were responsible for nearly 10% of the more than 13,000 children under state supervision.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Putin v. Elton John - The Battle Of Ending The Industry Of Trafficking Tiny Humans - Happy Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution Month!

This is about parental rights.

Degenderfication, as I am calling it, is being promulgated for legal purposes to smoothly transition into the re-engineered residuals of the peculiar institution to codify asset forfeiture for a civil debt by a corporate parent.

Degenderfication of children is just an overt action of what they have been doing as a corporate parental rights over their chattel, using foster kids, and children of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) as  lab rats.

The LBQRSTUV movement is just another campaign to expand their epigenetic operations to bill Medicaid and continue human subject research testing.

Someone has to be used to test those orphan drugs.

I know they do not have Medicaid in Russia, but they do have a serious issue with the industry of trafficking tiny humans.

Putin is defending the pirating of the children's trust funds, his nation's most precious treasures.

This has absolutely nothing to do with what people consent to do in their own lives, or romantic interlude of choosing.

This is about changing laws to further more stealin' by "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Putin says 'genius musician' Elton John mistaken on Russia LGBT rights

I wanted to say "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending). 

OSAKA, June 29 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday that Elton John was "mistaken" about LGBT rights in Russia, while praising the British singer as a musical genius.

Elton John said on Friday he was deeply upset by Putin's comment that liberal values were "obsolete" and had been rejected by the majority of people in Western nations.

He also accused Putin of hypocrisy for saying that he wanted LGBT people to be happy after reports that gay scenes in "Rocketman", the movie based on the singer's life, had been censored in Russia.

"I have a lot of respect for him, he is a genius musician, we all enjoy his music, but I think he is mistaken," Putin said when asked about Elton John's comments in Osaka where he was attending a G20 summit.

Putin said Russian authorities had a "relaxed and unprejudiced" attitude towards LGBT people, but decisions about gender identity could only be made by adults and therefore minors need to be "left alone".

Russian law bans "propaganda of homosexuality among minors".

The keywords in this sentence are "bans" and "propaganda".  The U.S. does not "ban child welfare propaganda".  In face, the U.S. has an entire highly sophisticated, complex financial fraud scheme called the Children's Trust Funds which was intentionally designed to promulgate child welfare propaganda.

Putin also said that while he did not deny the attractiveness of liberal values in general, he was referring to situations where they impinged on traditional lifestyles.

"Impinging on traditional lifestyles" sounds like a lovely affront, I shall liberally apply as a new way of describing purveying and procuring tiny humans through child welfare laws by experimenting with social constructs for more predictive modeling crap, strictly for the purposes of profit.

Nothing more. Nothing less.

(Reporting by Katya Golubkova; Writing by Olzhas Auyezov; Editing by Alexander Smith)

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Virginia Passes Bill Allowing Ownership Of One Person By Another - Chattel Ranching The Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution - Corporate Parental Rights

I told you so.

I have been telling the world for almost 20 years.

The Pro Life Movement is nothing more than a cover for trafficking tiny humans.

This is your modern day slavery, modern day human trafficking.

What they are going to do next is get "The Boys" to unleash their christian pro life propaganda psyoptics, but what they do not know is that we already have the playbook.

War crimes.

Their next rollout is going to go attack the LBQRSTUV movement, of which I typically call them humans, like the rest of the people in humanity, because they are all working together.

The goal is to label each individual based upon one's DNA and genotype, not phenotype.

 The "Atlas Shrugged" crew are the ones getting rich off the trafficking of tiny humans but are too gluttonously self indulgent to even care, as long as the profit margins are maximizing through returns.

This is about parental rights, the final roll out, because now, the corporate parent can now file for termination of parental rights.

The child welfare model is no longer based upon the arcane heirarchial classification of "race" but is now bsed upon civil debt, or rather poverty, where they are enacting the final plan of corporate parental rights for the asset forfeiture of children in the womb, utilizing the gradual switching of the legal terms of "Abortion" to mean "termination of parental rights".

You can consider this the state contracting in a Public Private Partnership to take legal custody of the identity of the child, pre-birth, by aborting the birth before the breaking of the water before the child is born unto the banks of the land.

The legal doctrine for the asset forfeiture of the child is call partus sequitur ventrum, a re-empowered concept of the peculiar institution.

 I wrote the book on parental rights. 

I was sitting at the table, writing this legislation, when these people came up with it, stole it and launched that pro life crap. 

It started in Michigan.

This is the modern day slavery Trump speaks upon, but I prefer to call it chattel ranching because it is the instant action to tap into those children's trust funds, just another part of the industry of trafficking tiny humans.

Bill to Make Babies Legal Property Passes House, Goes to Senate!

As I told you earlier this week, HB 1979 (D-Sullivan) is one of the most Anti-Family bills we've seen that actually has a shot at passing.

With your emails and calls, and The Family Foundation team's lobbying efforts, HB 1979 has taken some major hits, but unfortunately it still passed the House of Delegates this week on a vote of 61-36 where Delegate Dave LaRock masterfully critiques this bill, joined by Delegates Brenda Pogge and Nick Freitas.) Now it has been assigned to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee, and will most likely be voted on next week!

URGENT ACTION: Click HERE to contact the KEY Senators on the Committee and urge them to VOTE NO on HB 1979!

This bill will open up Pandora's Box on critical matters involving Life, Parental Rights, and the most basic notions of what it means to be a family. It must be stopped.Some are naively calling this bill "pro-life" because it will make it easier for single people and same-sex couples to enter into surrogacy contracts to implant one of the one million "snowflake babies" which have been created in labs and are currently frozen. But even setting aside the terrible public policy decision of encouraging children to be born into the world without both a mom and a dad, nothing in this bill would limit the continued proliferation of more and more lab-created human beings, most of which will be forever frozen or destroyed. 

Here are some of the terrible consequences of this bill: 

1)    Recognizes in VA law (for the first time since the 1860s) human beings as property to be “owned” by others.

• The bill language inserts “owns”, “owned”, or “ownership” 8 times to refer to human embryos. (A new concept and legal term of art.)

2)    Multiplies and expands the commodification of human beings to potentially be exchanged, traded, bought, and sold.

• Children are not commodities to be sold or bartered!

3)    Creates a new legal presumption for parenthood that is not tied to biology, undermining the parental rights of ALL parents. 

• This will cause serious long-term damage to our society. Imagine the immeasurable damage to a child when they will now grow up to be told that they never had a father, or that they never had a mother.

4)    Encourages the creation of babies without both a mom and a dad

 because it would now allow any single individual to contract with a surrogate to obtain a baby. 

• Unmarried homes create more unstable environments for children.

5)    Greatly  with a dad, a mom, and their resulting biological (or adopted) children.

• The breakdown of the family and familial bonds is the single greatest cause of ALL of the other social ills we face since the nuclear family is the bedrock societal institution.

6)    Leads to the commercialization of “lab-babies” with no parents, which will lead to selection based on certain desired traits.

• This will lead

 to countless human lives being created and destroyed in labs. 

7)    Erases terms like “husband” and “wife”, “his” and “her”, to replace them with gender-neutral language

.

• This further blurs important distinctions between male and female and removes child-rearing from the sexual/procreational/conjugal union of a man and woman, leading to the commodification of children, and ultimately to government assumption of parental rights.

Virginia HB 1979 - Allowing... by on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©