Cocktails & Popcorn: Stormy! - Avenatti Rips Her Off - Prosecutors Look At 300 Years

Stormy!

She got him.

There is hope when it comes to holding the legal community to responsible when there is a breach of the public trust.

He broke Canon Law.

That is Ethics.

Michael Avenatti charged with defrauding Stormy Daniels

NEW YORK (AP) — Michael Avenatti, the attorney who rocketed to fame through his representation of porn star Stormy Daniels in her battles with President Donald Trump, was charged Wednesday with ripping her off.

 Federal prosecutors in New York City say Avenatti used a doctored document to divert about $300,000 that Daniels was supposed to get from a book deal, then used the money for personal and business expenses.

Only half of that money was paid back, prosecutors said.

 Daniels isn't named in the court filing, but the details of the case, including the date her book was released, make it clear that she is the client involved.

 Avenatti denied the allegations on Twitter.

 "No monies relating to Ms. Daniels were ever misappropriated or mishandled.

She received millions of dollars worth of legal services and we spent huge sums in expenses.

She directly paid only $100.00 for all that she received.

I look forward to a jury hearing the evidence," he wrote.

 Avenatti added in a later tweet that his agreement for representing Daniels "included a percentage of any book proceeds."

 The charges pile on top of previous allegations of legal misconduct by Avenatti, who represented Daniels when she sued to be released from a nondisclosure agreement involving an alleged tryst with Trump.

The president denies an affair took place.

 Avenatti was previously charged in New York with trying to extort up to $25 million from Nike by threatening to expose claims that the shoemaker paid off high school basketball players to steer them to Nike-sponsored colleges.

And in Los Angeles, he's facing a multicount federal indictment alleging that he stole millions of dollars from clients, didn't pay taxes, committed bank fraud and lied during bankruptcy proceedings.

 Avenatti has denied the allegations against him on both coasts, saying he expects to be exonerated.

The Los Angeles charges alone carry a potential penalty of more than 300 years in prison.

 "I look forward to a jury hearing all of the evidence and passing judgment on my conduct," Avenatti wrote in a text message to The Associated Press. Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, initially hired Avenatti to handle a lawsuit she filed last year in which she sought to invalidate the nondisclosure agreement she'd signed with Trump's then-lawyer Michael Cohen in exchange for $130,000.

 The money was supposed to buy her silence during Trump's run for president about an alleged affair between the two. In August, Cohen pleaded guilty to violating campaign finance laws in connection with the payment. In announcing the new charges Wednesday, prosecutors said that Avenatti sent a "fraudulent and unauthorized letter" to Daniels' literary agent, instructing the agent to send payments not to Daniels but to a bank account Avenatti controlled.

They said he used the stolen funds to pay employees of his law firm and pay for hotels, airfare, dry cleaning and his Ferrari. "Far from zealously representing his client, Avenatti, as alleged, instead engaged in outright deception and theft, victimizing rather than advocating for his client," Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said in news release. Avenatti "blatantly lied" and stole to maintain his "extravagant lifestyle," Berman said.

 Daniels raised concerns with Avenatti about late payments around the time her book, "Full Disclosure," was published in October, according to the indictment.

 "When is the publisher going to cough up my money," she asked Avenatti in early December, according to the indictment.

 Avenatti responded that he was "working them and threatening litigation," prosecutors said, but he did not tell Daniels he had already received the money.

 Daniels began publicly raising concerns about Avenatti's conduct in November.

In a statement, she said Avenatti had launched a fundraising effort to raise money for her legal case without telling her.

She also said he had filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, on her behalf, against her wishes.

 "For months I've asked Michael Avenatti to give me accounting information about the fund my supporters so generously donated to for my safety and legal defense. He has repeatedly ignored those requests," she said.

"Days ago I demanded again, repeatedly, that he tell me how the money was being spent and how much was left.

Instead of answering me, without my permission or even my knowledge Michael launched another crowdfunding campaign to raise money on my behalf.

I learned about it on Twitter."

 At the time, Avenatti responded that he was still Daniels' "biggest champion."

 He said that under his retention agreement, she had agreed to pay him just $100 for his services, and he was entitled to keep all the money he raised for her legal defense to defray what he said were substantial costs of her case.

 The defamation case initiated by Avenatti against Trump backfired, with a judge ordering her to pay the president's legal bills.

 When Avenatti was first charged with defrauding other clients and extorting Nike in March, Daniels said she was "saddened but not shocked."

 She added on Twitter that she had fired Avenatti a month earlier after "discovering that he had dealt with me extremely dishonestly."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: The Attorney-Client Privilege Seems To Always Cover Up Dirt & Drama

The Attorney-Client Privilege seems to be this weed that vibrantly grows in the garden of justice, obfuscating the root systems of due process, for the purposes of either:

A.  Personal inurement of public office; or,

B.  Covering up how the personal inurement of public office was executed and who was thrown under the bus.

I have all intentions of illuminating the salacious  dirt & drama, pulling up the arcane legal weeds choking due process by harvesting the bounty from the garden of justice, which has been neglected for so many generations.

In summation...Welcome to Detroit!

Remember, we have all the tools to address those pesky, deep rooted attorney-client privileges.

Avenatti Hits Back Against WSJ Claims Of Stonewalling Feds In Cohen Case

Michael Avenatti & Stormy Daniels

Update: Avenatti responded to the WSJ report, suggesting that the story was "completely bogus and designed to undercut us."

"Any media report citing 'unnamed sources' (and not a single document) suggesting we are delaying the investigation into Mr. Cohen and DJT is completely false and without basis," he tweeted Tuesday morning. "We have already waived the privilege as to a host of docs and communications to ensure justice is done."

Any media report citing “unnamed sources” (and not a single document) suggesting we are delaying the investigation into Mr. Cohen and DJT is completely false and without basis. We have already waived the privilege as to a host of docs and communications to ensure justice is done.

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) May 29, 2018

See below. 1) the WSJ had the story in the closing days of the campaign but sat on it and 2) Mr. Davidson lied to them and conspired with Mr. Cohen in 2016. This is why we have demanded to see all of Davidson's docs for mos and will sue if need be. #Bastahttps://t.co/iCUrQg3VoT

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) May 29, 2018

Michael Avenatti has been frustrating federal prosecutors in their attempts to obtain information related to a $130,000 October 2016 payment made by President Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen to adult-film star Stephanie Clifford, also known as Stormy Daniels, who Avenatti represents.

Mr. Avenatti hasn’t yet acted on multiple requests from federal prosecutors in Manhattan for Ms. Clifford to waive the attorney-client privilege that prevents her former lawyer from discussing their communications about the nondisclosure deal, the people familiar with the matter said. In April, Mr. Avenatti, acting in his capacity as Ms. Clifford’s current lawyer, sent a cease-and-desist letter to her former lawyer, Keith Davidson, ordering him not to disclose any communications related to her, one of those people said.

Mr. Avenatti made similar demands of Ms. Clifford’s former manager, Gina Rodriguez, who helped engineer the hush-money deal. Mr. Avenatti tried to block Ms. Rodriguez from providing her communications with Ms. Clifford to federal prosecutors until he had reviewed them, other people familiar with the matter said. -WSJ

Avenatti said in an emailed statement to the Journal that Rodriguez's communications with Clifford are covered by attorney-client privilege because she was acting as a go-between for Clifford and Davidson. He also said that he had a right to review the documents and would sue Rodriguez if she would not provide them for review.

“We never told her not to provide documents to the government nor did we tell her not to cooperate,” Mr. Avenatti said.

Law professor Steven Lubet of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law told the Journal that Rodriguez's communications with Clifford would only be protected if they were to convey legal advice from, or giving direction to, Davidson.

Avenatti also denies threatening Rodriguez to enforce at 2016 nondisclosure agreement between the manager and Clifford which prevents the former manager from speaking publicly about her work with the former porn star. “That never happened. Period,” he said.

Given his history of threatening journalists over unfavorable coverage, and his wife's court testimony that he's "emotionally abusive," one has to wonder what Avenatti will say next.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Perkins Coie Sucks Even More: Michael Avenatti & Stormy Daniels

Once upon a time, the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed proclaimed onto the people of the land that Perkins Coie Sucks.

 She even generated a handy dandy tag: #perkinscoiesucks

Alas, it was soon discovered in the land of the dataverse, that Perkins Coie could suck even more than it currently sucks, henceforth, the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed reissues her decree.

#perkinscoiesucks

 Perkins Coie pays Michael Avenatti to represent Stormy Daniels in her quest for...well...I have really not figured out her harms yet, but I am sure something will come up from the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) like not being to get a job or make money, against an elected official about coming up with a way to enter a fake NDA into the court to proceed through a falsely advised legal machination of judgment, to prosecute for some sex drama, that the elected official has previously entered into the public record a denial.

Wow, those transposable models just keep popping up because this sounds like a legal cover narrative to justify using more sex drama stuff to get a FISA.  Must be the Vernal Equinox.

This sounds so much like a Child Protective Services child abuse proceeding and another reason why that "attorney-client privilege" thing needs to be stripped!

Stormy Daniels’ Lawyer Accused of Shady Business Practices

"Legal Genius" (trademark pending) Michael Avenatti

Michael Avenatti became famous for representing Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Donald Trump, but as it turns out, that development comes at a rocky time in his business life. Over the past few years, this attorney has been dealing with court battles and accusations surrounding his investment in the coffee chain Tully’s, according to a report from The Seattle Times. His ownership firm Global Baristas US, LLC, purchased the company five years ago for $9.15 million at a bankruptcy auction.

Problems started from the beginning. Avenatti was in business with Patrick Demspey (that’s right, he of Grey’s Anatomy and 1980s movie fame), but the actor sued, saying the lawyer falsely claimed that Global Baristas fully financed the Tully’s operation. According to Dempsey, Avenatti actually took out a $2 million loan at a high 15 percent interest rate, and used the newly purchased coffee chain as security. Avenatti denied allegations, and that complaint was settled out of court.

End of that story, but problems have continued to the current day. Tully’s has been clashing with local shopping mall Bellevue Square. After Bellevue owner Kemper Development didn’t renew leases for two Tully’s locations, Global Baristas pulled out of a third in spite of being in the middle of a 10-year lease and a remodel. Cue lawsuit by Bellevue. They won after a judge granted a default judgment, sanctioning Global Baristas, and ordering it to pay fines and plaintiff legal fees.

Last month, Bellevue attorney David Nold filed a complaint to the California State Bar Association, claiming Avenatti took $6 million withheld from Tully’s employee paychecks, even though that cash was meant for paying federal and states taxes. Avenatti also committed fraud by moving $100,000 from Tully’s to pay for his law firm’s bankruptcy, Nold claimed. The U.S. Attorney in Seattle was cc’d in the complaint. The California State Bar declined to tell the Times if they were investigating.
Avenatti denied allegations to the outlet, and attacked Nold as an attorney.

“Mr. Nold is widely known as an unethical ‘hack’ of a lawyer who routinely files baseless complaints,” he wrote in an email. “He is a disgrace to the legal profession and is consumed by jealousy of other attorneys so he makes baseless allegations. His most recent conduct is yet more of the same — I hope he gets the help he needs.” The outlet said it found evidence of no disciplinary or ethical problems by Nold in Washington State Bar records.

Since the 2013 purchase, Avenatti’s investment firm has reportedly been named in over 50 lawsuits nationwide, including one by Keurig Green Mountain, which owns the Tully’s name, and claims Global Baristas hadn’t paid licensing fees of $500,000. Federal records obtained by Law&Crime show that litigation is ongoing. The final few Tully’s locations shut down in March, during what a spokeswoman described as a “rebranding process,” according to the Times.
Avenatti did not answer questions about Tully’s.

“You will have to ask your questions to the new ownership group who long ago took on responsibility for various tax liabilities etc.,” he wrote. The outlet said he declined to name the owners, and explain when he divested.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Michael Cohen Lies To Congress, Pleads Guilty To Russian Real Estate Fraud & Stormy Is Mad At Avenatti For Suing Trump Without Her Permission

My sincerest apologies for failing to remind my loyal readers that #perkinscoiesucks.

Stormy Daniels: Michael Avenatti Sued Trump For Defamation Against My Wishes

Michael Avenatti sued Donald Trump for defaming Stormy Daniels against her wishes, Daniels told The Daily Beast in a statement on Wednesday.

Avenatti also started a new fundraising site to raise money for her legal defense fund without telling her, Daniels said. She said she is not sure whether or not she will keep Avenatti on as her lawyer.

Here is her full statement, provided to The Daily Beast:

“For months I’ve asked Michael Avenatti to give me accounting information about the fund my supporters so generously donated to for my safety and legal defense. He has repeatedly ignored those requests. Days ago I demanded again, repeatedly, that he tell me how the money was being spent and how much was left. Instead of answering me, without my permission or even my knowledge Michael launched another crowdfunding campaign to raise money on my behalf. I learned about it on Twitter.

“I haven’t decided yet what to do about legal representation moving forward. Michael has been a great advocate in many ways. I’m tremendously grateful to him for aggressively representing me in my fight to regain my voice. But in other ways Michael has not treated me with the respect and deference an attorney should show to a client. He has spoken on my behalf without my approval. He filed a defamation case against Donald Trump against my wishes. He repeatedly refused to tell me how my legal defense fund was being spent. Now he has launched a new crowdfunding campaign using my face and name without my permission and attributing words to me that I never wrote or said. I’m deeply grateful to my supporters and they deserve to know their money is being spent responsibly. I don’t want to hurt Michael, but it’s time to set the record straight. The truth has always been my greatest ally.

“My goal is the same as it has always been—to stand up for myself and take back my voice after being bullied and intimidated by President Trump and his minions. One way or another I’m going to continue in that fight, and I want everyone who has stood by me to know how profoundly grateful I am for their support.”

The Daily Beast shared this statement with Avenatti. He provided the following statement:

“I am and have always been Stormy’s biggest champion. I have personally sacrificed an enormous amount of money, time and energy toward assisting her because I believe in her. I have always been an open book with Stormy as to all aspects of her cases and she knows that. The retention agreement Stormy signed back in February provided that she would pay me $100.00 and that any and all other monies raised via a legal fund would go toward my legal fees and costs. Instead, the vast majority of the money raised has gone toward her security expenses and similar other expenses. The most recent campaign was simply a refresh of the prior campaign, designed to help defray some of Stormy’s expenses.”

Stephen Gillers, a New York University Law School professor and expert on legal ethics, said Avenatti could face serious problems if he sued Trump against Daniels’ wishes.

“If he filed the case with her name when it was clear that she told him not to, then he could be sued for that,” Gillers said. “He could be sued for malpractice. If true, she has a malpractice case against him. I emphasize if true. And if true, he would be subject to discipline but not as serious as disbarment.”

The current CrowdJustice site is one of just three fundraisers highlighted on CrowdJustice’s homepage as of Wednesday afternoon. An earlier CrowdJustice site raised more than $580,000 for Daniels’ legal defense and no longer accepts contributions.

When The Daily Beast contacted Avenatti on Tuesday and asked about Daniels’ two active Crowdjustice sites, the lawyer said, “We reset the page as the focus of the case changed from when we first launched the site.” The Daily Beast also asked on Tuesday for a breakdown of expenses. In response, Avenatti said via email, “The money has gone toward the areas identified on the page. For instance, Stormy's security detail has cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, especially due to the high level of death threats. The other out-of-pocket costs of the litigation are also extraordinary (and I'm not speaking of attorneys' fees). Trump and Cohen have spent millions in their defense].”

Avenatti claimed at the time that he hasn’t “received a dime in attorneys’ fees” from the crowdfunding effort. He said his firm has “spent well over a thousand hours of attorney time on the case at a value of over $1,500,000 (and no, we do not count interviews or media as attorney time).”

Avenatti’s legal work for Daniels hasn’t always succeeded. In the April defamation lawsuit against the president, Avenatti argued Trump hurt her by tweeting that she participated in a “total con job.”

But in November, a judge dismissed the suit and ordered Daniels to pay the president’s legal bills. Trump’s lawyers asked for almost $350,000 in legal fees; Daniels is now fighting to try to lower that bill.

Daniels and her lawyer have become household names since the revelation that Michael Cohen—then Trump’s personal attorney—paid her hush-money during the presidential campaign. Daniels says she had an affair with Trump years before he ran for office (a claim Trump denies), and accepted $130,000 from Cohen to stay quiet.

Cohen admitted in court in August that he made illegal payments during the campaign at Trump’s direction. He pleaded guilty to eight criminal counts and is awaiting sentencing.

Avenatti, meanwhile, has become a darling of the #Resistance, traveling to Iowa, raising money for Democratic candidates, and openly touting a potential 2020 presidential bid. But his White House dreams have faced major challenges; earlier this month, he was arrested under suspicion of domestic violence—allegations he roundly denies. And when he represented migrant children whom the Trump administration separated from their parents earlier this year, long-time immigration lawyers told The Observer he was “fantastically irresponsible.”

And as The Daily Beast reported in October, court records reveal that the lawyer and his companies owed millions to the IRS in unpaid taxes and judgments.

President Donald Trump’s former attorney lied to Congress about his role in pursuing a business deal in Russia for his old boss, covering up that discussions stretched into the 2016 presidential campaign and even reached the Kremlin.

Michael Cohen pleaded guilty in a Manhattan federal courtroom on Thursday to one count of making a false statement to Congress last year when he told lawmakers about his efforts to secure a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. Cohen’s plea was part of a deal he struck with special counsel Robert Mueller’s office that included significant cooperation with the investigation into Trump’s ties to Russia during the presidential campaign.

In an August 2017 letter sent to the House and Senate intelligence committees, Cohen said plans for a Moscow tower had ended shortly before Trump competed in the Republican presidential primaries. “By the end of January 2016, I determined that the proposal was not feasible for a variety of business reasons and should not be pursued further,” Cohen wrote.

But prosecutors say Cohen continued to discuss the proposal throughout the primaries and into the general-election season with Trump’s former business partner, the real-estate developer and convicted felon Felix Sater.

Cohen also told the Senate Intelligence Committee he did not discuss the project extensively within the Trump Organization. In fact, Mueller’s office said, Cohen discussed the project with Trump more than three times and “briefed family members of” Trump about it.

Cohen told Congress that he “never agreed to make a trip to Russia” about the proposal, but emails with Sater show Cohen repeatedly agreeing to Sater’s proposal for a trip to Moscow to seal the deal.

“ASSUMING the trip does happen the question is before or after the convention,” Cohen wrote to Sater in May 2016, two months before the Republican National Convention, adding Trump might potentially go to Moscow and meet Russian President Vladimir Putin around that time.

House Intel Panel Hiring Money-Laundering Sleuths

Cohen also allegedly lied about his communications with Dmitry Peskov, a spokesperson and close adviser to Putin, about the project. Cohen’s letter to Congress said he did “not recall any response to my email, nor any other contacts by me with” Peskov after he emailed him in January 2016 looking for help with the real-estate development plans.

But prosecutors say Cohen followed up with Peskov’s assistant in a phone call and “requested assistance in moving the project forward, both in securing land to build the proposed tower and financing the construction.”

In a court appearance Thursday, Cohen explained his lies by saying he “made these statements” to Congress to be consistent with Trump’s “political messaging” and to be loyal to Trump.”

Just a few weeks after Cohen’s last discussions of the tower project in June 2016, Trump tweeted: “For the record, I have ZERO investments in Russia.”

It was also revealed Thursday that Cohen has entered into a cooperation agreement with Mueller’s office as part of his plea deal. ABC News reports that Cohen sat with members of the office for a combined 70 hours, fielding questions about possible contacts between Russia and the Trump campaign, Trump’s business dealings in Russia, as well as possible obstruction of justice by the president.

Cohen’s cooperation with the Mueller inquiry on potential Russian collusion is significant because it shows that Cohen has been spilling more information to the Mueller investigation than previously known.

In August, Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion and bank-fraud charges to Manhattan federal prosecutors as part of an illegal scheme to pay hush money to Trump’s alleged former mistresses, Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal.

Cohen is scheduled to be sentenced for those crimes on Dec. 12. In exchange for his guilty plea and cooperation with the special counsel’s office, Cohen may hope to receive a lighter sentence than he otherwise would.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: "Q" Black Psyops Has Successfully Crossed Over Into Weaponized Reality - The Avenatti Threat

Have you ever wondered how propaganda campaigns are manufactured?

Well, if you have been following along for the last 10 years, you should, at this point, be able to spot a propaganda campaign in the blink of an eye.

In this case, this is how anonymously funded groups are forming in the dark web, I mean really, really dark web, coming up with propaganda campaigns to rally vulnerable populations, with the intent of executing their nefarious schemes, which more than likely, as seen in this live case study, for the purposes of privateering, or probably a legal defense smear campaign.

Speaking of smear campaigns... it feels like Perkins Coie has there hand stuck in the batter of this psyop.

I am going to just go out there, on a limb, and make an "unfounded assertion" that this "Q" might be a familiar, "spurious correlation" somewhere, floating around, in a financial transaction.

Rumors have it the U.S. Senate Judiciary has taken up this "anonymous" source called "Q".

But, hey, what do I know?

#perkinscoiesucks

This is not a "peaceable assembly", and as such, disturbs the tranquility of the public, making this a mob activity of insurrection.

This is getting violent.

That is not cool.

Avenatti Targeted in Person by QAnon, the Crazy Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theory

Police are investigating a man photographed outside the office of Stormy Daniels’s attorney after ‘Q,’ the theory’s leader, sent followers there.

Stormy & Avenatti

Stormy Daniels’ lawyer Michael Avenatti is the latest target for supporters of the pro-Trump conspiracy theory QAnon, with police investigating a man’s appearance near Avenatti’s office after the building was mentioned in QAnon posts.

QAnon believers claim that a series of cryptic clues posted to internet forums 4Chan and 8Chan are coming from a high-level Trump administration insider, describing a world where Trump has teamed up with the military to take on a global cabal of powerful elites, celebrities, and pedophiles.

“Q,” the online poster whose messages make up the basis of the QAnon theory, targeted Avenatti on Sunday by posting a link to Avenatti’s website and pictures of his Newport Beach, California, office building.

“Buckle up!” the post, made on 8Chan, read.

About 45 minutes later, Q posted a picture of a man standing in the street near Avenatti’s office. The man, who has his back to the camera, is holding what appears to be a cellphone in one hand and a long, thin object in the other.  

We are trying to identify the man in this picture, which was taken outside my office yesterday (Sun) afternoon. Please contact @NewportBeachPD if you have any details or observed him. We will NOT be intimidated into stopping or changing our course. #Basta pic.twitter.com/YIKS6D0Grq

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) July 30, 2018

Avenatti said that the man in the picture might be holding a shank.

“That’s not a set of keys,” Avenatti told The Daily Beast. “It also looks like he’s wearing a toupee of some sort. And not a very good one, I might add.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: The Kavanaugh Porn Is Coming

The porno is coming!

 The porno is coming!

Wait!

Then this happened.

Stormy’s Lawyer Has Accounts Frozen By Judge

But, this is much more interesting because we may be looking at the first reveal of foster care and adoption.

Yes.....you must have cocktails and popcorn on hand once we get to Detroit.

Hmmmmmmmmmm................yeeeeeeeeesssssss............Detroit.................

Read the full sworn statement from Julie Swetnick, the third woman to accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct

• Accuser Julie Swetnick, in a sworn declaration tweeted out by her lawyer Michael Avenatti, alleges that Kavanaugh and others while in high school spiked the drinks of girls at parties to make it easier for them to be gang raped.
• "I witnessed Brett Kavanaugh consistently engage in excessive drinking and inappropriate contact of a sexual nature with women during the early 1980s," Swetnick says in her statement, which she signed under penalty of perjury.
• Kavanaugh has said he categorically denies ever sexually assaulting anyone. His lawyer and the White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's requests for comment on Swetnick's claims.

A third woman stepped forward Wednesday to accuse Supreme Court hopeful Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.

Accuser Julie Swetnick, in a sworn declaration tweeted out by her lawyer Michael Avenatti — who is also representing porn star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Donald Trump — alleged that Kavanaugh and others, while in high school, spiked the drinks of girls at parties to make it easier for them to be gang raped.

"I witnessed Brett Kavanaugh consistently engage in excessive drinking and inappropriate contact of a sexual nature with women during the early 1980s," Swetnick says in her statement, which she signed under penalty of perjury.

Michael Avenatti, attorney for Stephanie Clifford, also known as adult film actress Stormy Daniels, speaks to reporters as he leaves the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on September 24, 2018 in Los Angeles, California. Avenatti claims to have information pertaining to allegations concerning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The three-page declaration was sent to the counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is set to hear testimony from Kavanaugh and another woman, Christine Blasey Ford, as early as tomorrow. A spokesman for committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley said the committee is currently reviewing the document.

Kavanaugh has said he categorically denies ever sexually assaulting anyone.

On Wednesday, Kavanaugh responded to the latest accusations in a statement released by the White House: "This is ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone. I don't know who this is and this never happened."

s Wet Nick Statement by on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

$10 Million Reasons Why The Stormy Daniels Case Is Going To Get Juicier

I do believe that Avenatti will become a bit more aggressive in his legal advocacy.

Judge orders law firm of Stormy Daniels’ lawyer to pay $10M

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal judge in California ordered a law firm linked to Stormy Daniels’ attorney to pay $10 million on Tuesday to a lawyer who claimed that the firm had misstated its profits and that he was owed millions.

The judgment came after Jason Frank, who used to work at Eagan Avenatti, alleged that that the law firm failed to pay a $4.85 million settlement he had reached in December. He said in court papers that the settlement was personally guaranteed by Michael Avenatti, who has garnered national attention as the attorney for Daniels, the porn actress who is suing President Donald Trump following an alleged 2006 affair.

Frank had worked at Avenatti’s firm under an independent contractor agreement and was supposed to collect 25 percent of the firm’s annual profits, along with 20 percent of fees his clients paid, according to court documents. He resigned in May 2016 after alleging that the firm didn’t pay him millions of dollars that he was owed, misstated the firm’s profits and wouldn’t provide copies of tax returns and other financial documents.

After he resigned, Frank brought the case to a panel of arbitrators, who found that the firm “acted with malice, fraud, and oppression by hiding its revenue numbers,” according to a copy of the arbitration report included in court documents.

In December, Frank settled with Avenatti’s firm for a total of $4.85 million, which was supposed to include an initial $2 million payment and then a second payment for $2.85 million. The $2 million payment was supposed to be made by May 14, but Avenatti and his firm never paid, Frank said in court papers.

The settlement agreement included a clause that the firm couldn’t oppose a request for a $10 million judgment if the settlement payments weren’t made within three days of the due date. Frank did not immediately return a telephone message seeking comment on Tuesday.

The judgment is final and cannot be appealed, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Catherine Bauer said in her ruling.

Court records in the bankruptcy proceeding also show Avenatti had personally agreed to pay about $2.4 million in back taxes and penalties. During Tuesday’s hearing, an assistant U.S. attorney said Avenatti had not made a payment that was due last week for unpaid taxes as part of the agreement that was reached in January.

Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles, said lawyers from that office represent the government in bankruptcy court when there’s a debt to a government agency, like back taxes or unpaid student loans.

Avenatti told The Associated Press that he would not discuss “irrelevant nonsense” and wouldn’t answer specific questions about the case.

Court documents say Avenatti is the “managing member and majority equity holder” of Eagan Avenatti and “solely owns and controls” another firm, Avenatti & Associates, which represents Daniels.

Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, has said she had an affair with Trump in 2006 and has sued to invalidate the confidentiality agreement she signed days before the 2016 presidential election that prevents her discussing it. She’s also suing Trump and his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, alleging defamation.

___

Eagan Avenatti Bankruptcy Ruling by MikeBalsamoReports on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Stormy Daniels Has All The Legal Geniuses Suing Each Other's Attorney Client Privileges Away

Go Stormy!

She is a legal dominatrix.

She has all these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) suing each other over ethical concerns regarding the besmirching of the honorable profession of being an officer of the court of law.

Something tells me the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) in the military "sex, drugs & dark weapons" scandals is going to be even messier.

Remember David Patreaus?

I do.

He has an email scandal and I bet there are some extremely naughty stuff in his attachments.

Oh, and before I forget, Perkins Coie Sucks.

Stormy Daniels Says Michael Cohen Told Melania Daniels Was a Liar

New lawsuit says the president's lawyer tried to do damage control about alleged affair face-to-face with the First Lady at Mar-a-Lago.

Stormy Daniels’ old attorney plotted with President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to get her on the Sean Hannity Show and deny her affair with the president, according to a new lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The porn actress is suing Keith Davidson, her former lawyer and peddler of Hollywood dirt and sex tapes, alleging he breached his fiduciary duty by secretly collaborating with Cohen and disclosing information about her legal strategy.

Earlier this year, Daniels became a household name after filing a lawsuit against Cohen and Trump to invalidate a “hush agreement” she signed weeks before the 2016 election. Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 in exchange for her silence on her alleged 2006 romp with Trump, then a real-estate mogul and reality TV star.

Daniels’ legal filings reveal how Davidson, the counselor who inked her non-disclosure agreement, supposedly enjoyed a chummy relationship with Cohen behind the scenes.

Another allegation in the lawsuit: Cohen held a meeting with First Lady Melania Trump at Mar-a-Lago in March to discredit Daniels.

Davidson’s spokesman called the lawsuit “outrageously frivolous” and said it was an attempt by Daniels’ attorney, Michael Avenatti, to distract from negative press about his former law firm, which was slapped with a $10-million bankruptcy settlement.

“That said, Attorney Davidson is very happy that [Avenatti] has filed this lawsuit because [Davidson] strongly believes that the filing constitutes a full and complete waiver of the attorney-client privilege,” said the spokesman, Dave Wedge, in a statement to The Daily Beast.

Wedge appeared to make lemonade out of legal lemons.

“Thankfully, the truth can now finally come out to rebut the false narrative about Attorney Davidson that Mr. Avenatti has been pushing in his more than 175 television appearances and countless other media interviews,” Wedge continued. “Attorney Davidson believes that the American people deserve to know the entire truth—and they soon will. This lawsuit has made that happen.”

Keith Davidson should have been charged after his arrest for extortion not long ago. He is a disgrace to the profession. Watch him now try and distract away from his own unethical conduct. Ms. Daniels deserved better. https://t.co/wd6rfnFCuQ via @thedailybeast

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) June 6, 2018

For his part, Avenatti said that text messages discussing a potential Hannity interview only bolster his client’s claim of a cover-up.

“These text messages show that the prior denials by Mr. Trump and Mr. Cohen relating to what Mr. Trump knew and about the honesty of my client were absolute lies,” Avenatti said in a statement. “There was a significant cover-up here as part of an attempt to deceive the American people and Mrs. Trump and we intend on getting to the bottom of it.”

In January, Davidson and Cohen tried to do damage control after In Touch magazine ran a steamy interview with Daniels on bedding Trump, according to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court and first reported by NBC News.

“Call me,” Cohen texted Davidson on Jan. 17, after learning of the scoop. The lawyers—who were supposed to be opposing counsel—“hatched a plan” to get Daniels on Fox News with Sean Hannity to decry the story’s accuracy, the complaint says.

Two hours later, at 2:32 p.m., Cohen messaged Davidson again. “I have her tentatively scheduled for Hannity tonight. Call me after your trial,” Cohen wrote. (Cohen, who’s facing a federal probe over his business dealings and the Daniels NDA, admitted last month that Hannity is one of three recent clients. Another is GOP donor Elliott Broidy.)

Cohen scheduled Daniels—born Stephanie Clifford—to appear on Hannity’s show “only after consultation with Mr. Trump,” the complaint says.

“She cannot don’t [sic] today. She is flying to LA tomorrow. I’m trying to get her to commit for tomorrow,” Davidson replied.

But Cohen, in a panic, sent a cascade of texts to persuade Daniels, “with the assistance of Mr. Hannity, to lie to the American public about her relationship with Mr. Trump via the Fox News broadcast,” her complaint states.

“Can you call me please,” Cohen wrote at 3:25 p.m. He followed up with “Please call me” about 20 minutes later. “Anything?” Cohen added.

“Still trying,” Davidson replied.

“This is no good,” Cohen wrote. “We need her as by doing tomorrow you just create another news cycle instead of putting an end to this one.”

“C’mon!” Cohen desperately texted at 5:01 p.m.

Yet around 5:30 p.m., Cohen changed his tune.

“Let’s forget tonight,” Cohen wrote. “They would rather tomorrow so they can promote the heck out of the show.” According to the lawsuit, “They” refers to Fox News and the Trump administration.

By 8 p.m., Cohen informed Davidson that the porn star’s appearance on Hannity was unnecessary.

“Keith, The wise men all believe the story is dying and don’t think it’s smart for her to do any interviews,” Cohen texted. “Let her do her thing but no interviews at all with anyone.” (In her lawsuit, Daniels says the “wise men” include Trump.)

Davidson agreed, answering, “100%”

“Thanks pal,” Cohen replied. “Just no interviews or statements unless through you.”

“Got it,” Davidson wrote.

These texts show Davidson was set to arrange a media appearance not for Daniels’ benefit but for the benefit of Trump, the lawsuit alleges.

“Indeed, once Mr. Cohen concluded that it was no longer in his own best interest, or those of his client… Mr. Cohen called off the appearance entirely and Mr. Davidson agreed without hesitation,” her lawsuit states.

Davidson wasn’t acting as Daniels’ lawyer; he instead was a “puppet” for Cohen and Trump, the lawsuit says.

In February, Davidson learned Daniels had a new attorney and was about to spill the beans on her affair with Trump, the complaint says. Davidson then allegedly tipped Cohen off about her plans. As a result, Cohen began an arbitration against Daniels on Feb. 27 and sought a temporary restraining order to silence her, the lawsuit alleges.

Davidson allegedly contacted Cohen again in March, alerting him that Daniels was preparing to file a lawsuit to void her “hush agreement.”

Cohen then made efforts to quickly meet with First Lady Melania Trump to “get out in front” of the bombshell suit, “and to convince her that [Daniels] was a liar and not to be trusted,” the complaint says.

The embattled Trump stalwart allegedly met with Melania Trump on March 2 at Mar-a-Lago but stuck with his own narrative. “Cohen did not disclose to Mrs. Trump that not only was [Daniels] far from being a liar, Mr. Cohen had begged her to appear on Mr. Hannity’s show weeks earlier,” the lawsuit says.

The complaint also alleges that Cohen recorded his conversations with Davidson, and that those discussions include sensitive information on Daniels.

Meanwhile, Davidson is accused of withholding Daniels’ entire client file from her and refusing to turn over text messages and correspondence with Cohen.

“Mr. Davidson’s failure to provide the information demanded has prejudiced Ms. Clifford in numerous ways including… hampering her ability to review documents and cooperate with government inquiries regarding Mr. Cohen, Mr. Trump and Mr. Davidson.”

Daniels is seeking damages and fees in excess of $100,000.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Kavanaugh Accuser Julie Swetnick Used To Date George Webb

They used to do the nasty.

Now, he is officially part of the U.S. Senate Confirmation Hearings investigation.

Much more to cum.

Go get me some more popcorn.

This is too juicy.

Here Is the Full Text of the Declaration by Julie Swetnick, the Third Women to Accuse Kavanaugh of Sexual Misconduct

In her sworn statement, Swetnick says that she "fully understands the seriousness" of her accusations and charges that she was "gang raped" when she was a high school student at a party where Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were both in attendance.

WHO IS JULIE SWETNICK, THE AVENATTI CLIENT ACCUSING KAVANAUGH OF ATTENDING GANG RAPE PARTIES?

• Little is known about Julie Swetnick, the woman who came forward on Wednesday to accuse Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in high school.
• Swetnick, who is being represented by Michael Avenatti, claims that Kavanaugh spiked drinks at parties where women were gang-raped.
• Kavanaugh vehemently denies the claims.

Julie Swetnick, a 55-year-old IT professional living in Washington, D.C., leveled serious allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday, a day before the Senate Judiciary Committee is poised to hear testimony from the judge and Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, another woman accusing him of sexual misdeeds when he was in high school.

In a declaration released by her attorney, Michael Avenatti, Swetnick alleged that Kavanaugh and a friend spiked girls’ drinks with alcohol during parties in the early 1980s. She also suggested the conservative judge was present during gang rapes, which allegedly took place in the suburbs of Washington, D.C.

Swetnick claimed that Kavanaugh was at one party in 1982 where she was gang raped, though she does not accuse him of taking part in the attack.

Of particular note in Swetnick’s declaration is the age difference between she and Kavanaugh. Swetnick said the events described in her declaration occurred between 1981 and 1983, when she was between 18 and 21 years old. Kavanaugh would have been between 15 and 18 years old at the time.

She graduated from Gaithersburg High School in 1980, according to Swetnick’s resume. She was born in December 1962, according to publicly available records. Kavanaugh was born in February 1965 and graduated from Georgetown Prep School in 1983.

(RELATED: Woman Repped By Avenatti Claims Kavanaugh Attended Gang-Rape Parties)

Swetnick’s eleventh-hour emergence has come under scrutiny, as has her representation by Avenatti, the lawyer for Stormy Daniels, the porn star who claims to have had an affair with President Donald Trump.

(RELATED: Kavanaugh Responds To Accuser Represented By Avenatti)

In her own complaint against Kavanaugh, Blasey Ford alleged that Mark Judge, a longtime friend of Kavanaugh’s, was present when Kavanaugh attempted to rape her during a house party in the summer of 1982. Ford claimed that Kavanaugh and Judge trapped her in a bedroom, and that Kavanaugh forced himself on her and attempted to remove her clothes.

Both Kavanaugh and Judge have denied that the incident occurred. A college classmate of Kavanaugh’s has also come forward to claim that he thrust his penis in her face at a party when they both attended Yale. Before coming forward, the accuser, Deborah Ramirez, told friends that she was not entirely certain that Kavanaugh was the person who exposed himself to her.

Swetnick’s allegations are vague on details and specifics, though she claimed that unnamed eyewitnesses will back up her claims.

She alleged that she attended more than 10 house parties with Kavanaugh and Judge. During the gatherings, Swetnick says she witnessed Kavanaugh “drink excessively and engage in highly inappropriate conduct, including being overly aggressive with girls and not taking ‘No’ for an answer.” She alleged that the conduct “included the fondling and grabbing of girls without their consent” and that Kavanaugh was “abusive and physically aggressive” towards girls.

She alleged that Kavanaugh and Judge would spike drinks at parties in order to lower victims’ defenses.

“I also witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be ‘gang raped’ in a side room or bedroom by a ‘train’ of numerous boys. I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

Swetnick further claimed that “in approximately 1982,” she was the victim of a gang rape at a party where Kavanaugh and Judge were present. Swetnick would have been 19 or 20 years old at the time, while Kavanaugh would have been 16 or 17.

Kavanaugh denied the allegations as “ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone.”

“I don’t know who this is and this never happened,” Kavanaugh said in a statement issued through the White House.

Little else is known about Swetnick, other than items included on her resume and several court cases she has been involved in over the years.

A credentialed web developer, Swetnick lists security clearances with the U.S. Department of Treasury and U.S. Mint. She previously held clearances at the “Secret” level (“Top Secret” is the highest) for the State Department and Department of Justice.

Swetnick also claims to have a security clearance with the IRS despite having recently had a $40,000 judgement against her for unpaid taxes. She settled a $40,303 IRS judgement on March 23 of this year, according to a public records search. Maryland court records show a $62,821 tax lien filed against her on Oct. 2, 2015.

Swetnick has also been involved in civil cases in Maryland and Oregon.

Swetnick filed a personal injury lawsuit against the Washington, D.C. Metro in September 1994. The outcome of that case is also unclear.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Ice Cube, Stormy Daniels, Avenatti, Cohen, Flynn, Bannon, Qatar Investment Authority & Elmo

Elmo & Ice Cube

On this exciting episode of Cocktails & Popcorn, it looks like we must definitely invite Elmo.

Here's how Ice Cube figures in the Trump-Cohen mess

Donald Trump was already facing a fierce battle from a prominent member of the porn industry.

Now he’s up against N.W.A.

The investigations into the Trump campaign’s links to Russia, and his lawyer Michael Cohen’s ties to deep-pocketed foreign investors, just introduced another potential star witness: Ice Cube.

On Sunday, Michael Avenatti, the media savvy lawyer for porn star Stormy Daniels, claimed Ahmed Al-Rumaihi, an investor managing billions for the government of Qatar, held a secret meeting in Trump Tower in December 2016 with Cohen — and tweeted out pictures and video supporting his assertion.

Avenatti suggested the supposed meeting with Cohen may have to do with other allegations hovering over the Qatari investor, namely political bribery.

That’s where Ice Cube — famed rapper, actor and entrepreneur — comes in. The hip-hop mogul and his business partner have brought a$1.2 billion lawsuit against Al-Rumaihi over a startup basketball league called BIG3.

Specifically, Ice Cube’s suit features testimony alleging that Al-Rumaihi tried to use the financial might of the government of Qatar to cement political ties with former Trump campaign chairman, Steve Bannon, and former National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn.

Translation: Cube and his business partner may have key information relating to a Middle Eastern government’s attempts to buy political support from people who once served at the highest levels of the Trump administration.

Read: Here’s why Trump’s motive in the Stormy Daniels payoff matters

Ice Cube launched BIG3 along with his partner Jeff Kwatinetz in 2017, and the fund led by Al-Rumaihi, which manages about $100 billion on behalf of the government of Qatar, soon agreed to invest millions in the league.

In their lawsuit, Ice Cube and Kwatinetz claim that after that deal was agreed, relations between the founding partners and their investors began to sour — and turn political.

Although Bannon wasn’t involved in BIG3, he once worked with Kwatinetz in another media company, and the two remain friends. Al-Ruhaimi, according to the suit, saw this relationship as an opportunity for his home-country.

Read: Who is Viktor Vekselberg, the Russian oligarch tied to a $500k Payment to Michael Cohen?

Qatar has been struggling under the weight of a trade and diplomatic blockade launched by Saudi Arabia — one that Trump has appeared to support — and has been in search for relief.

Kwatinetz testified that after investing in BIG3, Al-Ruhaimi repeatedly brought up Bannon and the Trump administration’s position on the trade embargo. Then, in January 2018, the two men went on a hike — and Al-Rumaihi said he had a message from Qatar for Bannon, according to Kwatinetz.

“Al-Rumaihi requested I set up a meeting between him, the Qatari government, and Steve Bannon, and to tell Steve Bannon that Qatar would underwrite all his political efforts in return for his support,” Kwatinetz testified.

Kwatinetz claims he responded he was “offended by this request,” but that the Qatari businessman replied that he’d already forged some kind of financial relationship with Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn.

“Al-Rumaihi laughed and then stated to me that I shouldn’t be so naive, that so many Washington politicians have taken our money, and stated ‘do you think [Michael] Flynn turned down our money?,” Kwatinetz testified.

Flynn resigned from his post in Trump administration for lying about his phone calls with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during the transition.

Sports Trinity, which represents the Qatari investors in BIG3, has slammed Ice Cube and Kwatinetz’s accusations as untrue.

“Kwatinetz and Ice Cube have subsequently engaged in a public smear campaign, making unfounded and defamatory remarks about investors and departing executives, all to the detriment of the BIG3,” the group said in a statement.

But on Sunday, Avenatti tweeted out a link to a C-SPAN video that appeared to show Al-Rumaihi arriving in Trump Tower with a group including Cohen, Trump’s personal lawyer.

Cohen, of course, has been making headlines lately for accepting millions of dollars in payments from corporations like AT&T and pharmaceutical firm Novartis. Those firms have said they paid Cohen because they were seeking insight into the Trump administration.

Cohen, according to documents revealed by Avenatti, also accepted half a million dollars from a U.S. investment firm closely linked to Russian oligarch Viktor Veskelberg.

BIG3 LLC v. Qatar Investment Authority by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: What Do Kavanaugh & Conyers Have In Common?

Q: What do Kavanaugh & Conyers have in common?

A: A menagerie of privileged psychotic zoo animals who fail to understand that making false claims into the public record under oath is a fraud, which just so happens to be a federal crime to be referred to the Office of Special Prosecutor for further action.

So, that is why there will be trials in 2019.

Oups, j'ai dit une bétise!

I am biting my pearls to find out what these people are going to do when the parents testify, under oath, of the screams of their children who were ripped from their arms in the middle of the night to be drugged, raped and tortured in foster care for years.

I wonder if the Congress and the public will give this much attention to the children when they tell their stories, and it is not 35 years ago, it is going on, still, to this day, as we speak, and no one cares.

Priorities, you know.

Bill Cosby his sentence for sexually assaulting
Andrea Constand

Just to properly frame the Kavanaugh Psyoptic in a more down to earth light, allow me to introduce a counter argument to spotlight, again, the need for everyone to tell their stories, under oath, in Senate Judiciary Hearings.

The Latest: Cosby accusers say he got what he deserved

Mary Zolkowski, 21, pleaded guilty to falsely reporting a felony

There is one common factor in the Cosby conviction and the Zolkowski conviction: there was a police report.

Woman who lied about rape at Michigan college sentenced to jail

Yes, at no time have any of the women who have accused Kavanaugh of attempted rape and rape, or whatever the new story of the day is, have ever filed a police report.

You would think, instead of going online and starting a fundraising campaign, even though these are weathly, professional women, who have access to legal representation, have never, ever, ever filed a police report.

Nope.

So, let me explain to you the role of the police since it seems we are dealing with "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Police are keepers of the peace, civil servants, which means they have the duty to preserve the public record, as keeper of the record.

Police are civil servants to preserve civility of society, which includes protecting the civil rights of individuals who have been accused of any transgression, because it is the role of the officer to investigate, gather evidence and process it to prevent any future harms to society.

Law enforcement is more than just body armor and guns.

Law enforcement records the claims in the annals of history.

Law enforcement is supposed to enforce law, like the U.S. Attorney General, and we have civil rights laws on the books that have yet to be stripped by these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

So, this means that, in the event these transgressions happened when they were juveniles, under the age of 18, the legal guardian, in this instance, the parents were supposed to bring forth claims to law enforcement, due to privacy issues in child welfare law, which is just another reason to have congressional testimony.

If no one has brought forth claims against Kavanaugh, then, the responsibility defaults to Congress to report it to law enforcement for full investigation and prosecution, whether valid, or invalid.

If law enforcement finds the enough evidence that there are grounds for prosecution, then, the U.S. Attorney General can take action, if the accusers have given false testimony in a congressional hearing, then, there are grounds for criminal prosecution, just like Mary Zolkowski.

Deborah Ramirez

KAVANAUGH HIRES AWARD WINNING FEMALE LAWYER OVER ASSAULT ALLEGATION - Beth Wilkinson

Then, the New Yorker, that you must pay to read unless you know who to circumvent the paywall, comes out with the story of the latest Kavanaugh accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who has also hails from the hermetically sealed ivory tower of society, came out with an even more salacious 36 year old suppressed memory.

New Yorker Publishes Accusation Containing ZERO Evidence to Support, and 100% of Evidence To Refute…

Then Avenatti jumps into the mix.

New Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick details parties where girls allegedly were drugged and raped

Kavanaugh denies being part of prep school party culture, but evidence seems to contradict claim from CNBC.

Then, Kavanaugh goes on FOX to make the statement that he was a virgin in high school.

Then, Avenatti got trolled on 4chan.

I see you 4chan! pic.twitter.com/rqElGHnrkQ

— Jordan Sather (@Jordan_Sather_) September 25, 2018

Then, Trump trolled Avenatti on Twitter.

Avenatti is a third rate lawyer who is good at making false accusations, like he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is just looking for attention and doesn’t want people to look at his past record and relationships - a total low-life!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 26, 2018

Then, Avenatti trolled Trump back.

“False accusations?” Like those crimes your fixer Cohen pled to? You are an habitual liar and complete narcissist who also is a disgrace as a president and an embarrassment to our nation. You are so inept that your “best and brightest” are Cohen and Giuliani. Let’s go.

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) September 26, 2018

Then, this happened.

Michael Avenatti Goes Into Hiding After He Got Punked By 4Chan

What these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) fail to understand is that the Office of Special Counsel has all their "encrypted" chats.

Then, this happened.

Latest Kavanaugh Allegations Send Senate Into Chaos

If you think this is dramatic, just wait until we arrive in Detroit.

Public clowning will be taken to an entirely new level because in Detroit, it is always "ghetto fabulous".

#needmorepopcorn

Feds question UAW officials' spending on Palm Springs trips

#perkinscoiesucks

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©