Showing posts sorted by date for query carmack. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query carmack. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, July 18, 2020

Gabe Leland & Another Legal Jurisdictional Rescheduling

So, the cases of Gabe Leland go from DOJ, to Wayne County, to Macomb County, bifurcated to State, where DOJ still holds the parental authority of the legal matter in a superseding action.

I may have skipped a few jurisdictional machinations, but I might have to visually map this messy out.

Here's hoping I did not piss off anyone in the City of Detroit because they shut off my water since I got a $600 sewage bill this month, because it rained and another property tax foreclosure notice which no one will provide me constituency services.

I wonder why?

Maybe it is because I live in District 7, or something like that.

#maytheheavensfall

Detroit City Councilman Gabe Leland charged with misconduct in office, a felony

The cloud over Gabe Leland got bigger and darker today as the Monroe County prosecutor charged the Detroit city councilman with misconduct in office.

The felony charge comes a month before Leland was scheduled to go to trial in federal court on three counts of bribery for allegedly demanding $15,000 from Bob Carmack to help the businessman in a dispute with the city.

The misconduct in office charge, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine of $10,000, indicates that Leland's fate will be decided in state court rather than U.S. District Court. The charge was brought by Monroe County Prosecutor Michael Roehrig after U.S. Attorney Matthew Schneider asked Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy to take the case. Worthy cited a conflict of interest in any case involving Carmack, who is suing county officials, so the Michigan Attorney General's office assigned the case to Monroe County.

The Free Press reported in May that Roehrig's office was reviewing the case.

Roehrig would not discuss whether his office has been working with federal officials, beyond saying: "It's fair to say we have had discussions with the U.S. Attorney’s office regarding this matter.”

Roehrig also would not discuss the details of the case, but the charging document alleges that Leland "accepted payments of money to influence his vote on certain city matters over the course of his employment as a city councilman.”

The Monroe County Prosecutor alleges that Leland's misconduct occurred between Jan. 1, 2017 and Jan. 31, 2018.

Leland was indicted on three counts of bribery on Oct. 4, 2018, after a federal grand jury determined he demanded $15,000 in May 2017 from Carmack. Leland, who represents District 7 on the city’s west side, continues to serve on the City Council without any restrictions.

Steve Fishman, Leland’s attorney, said Friday: "The sky is actually brighter and more blue for Mr. Leland today because we have reached an agreement to resolve his case in state court.

"He made a big mistake by accepting a campaign contribution in cash which is against the law in Michigan," Fishman added. "He accepts responsibility for his actions and deeply regrets it."

Leland did not return a call seeking comment.

On Oct. 9, 2018, after the first full council meeting since his indictment, Leland met with reporters outside the council chambers on the 13th floor of City Hall.

“I’m innocent until proven guilty and that’s my statement until further comment,” he said.

Six days later, Leland was arraigned in U.S. District Court, one block away from the Caucus Club where the feds say he met with Carmack. As he walked away from the courthouse, Leland said: “I’m innocent, and I’m looking forward to trial.”

Fishman had vowed to take the case to trial, telling reporters after Leland's arraignment: "Most cases over here — 95% — result in a guilty plea.

"This one won't."

Fishman planned to attack Carmack's credibility. Carmack is currently awaiting trial on allegations that he stole city land and sold it for $1 million. Carmack denies any wrongdoing, and the district court judge who bound the case over for trial in Wayne County Circuit Court did so after questioning the strength of the prosecution's case.

But there were signs the case might never go to trial, including records filed in federal court this year signed by prosecutors and Fishman that said: “the parties have discussed a resolution of the matter and need additional time to determine whether a resolution is possible.”

It is unlikely the federal case would proceed if Leland reaches a plea deal with Roehrig's office. Because the charge was filed Friday, there is no timeline yet for the state case. It is unlikely Leland would stand trial in state and federal court at the same time.

There are several reasons Leland may prefer to resolve the case in state court. The maximum sentence for the misconduct in office charge is half the 10 years Leland faces if convicted of bribery in federal court. There is also just one charge in state court, instead of the three counts he faces in federal court. If convicted, multiple guilty counts would likely increase Leland's sentence. And Leland may eventually be able to get a single felony conviction removed from his record, whereas multiple counts would be there permanently.

More: Duggan will try to get Detroit City Council to pass new $250M blight bond deal — again

More: Detroit renters facing eviction get $6 million in aid to help stay in their home

Cash for the councilman
Leland’s troubles date back to May 12, 2017, when prosecutors say Leland spoke to Carmack about land on Michigan Avenue that Carmack and the city each claimed. Leland, who was chairman of the City Council’s Planning and Economic Development Committee, stopped the city from selling the land.

“I held it up again,” Leland allegedly told Carmack during a phone call. “Yeah, yeah, it stayed, stayed right, right in committee, brother.”

Later in the call, federal prosecutors say Leland told Carmack: “You didn’t show up to my fundraiser.”

Four days later, the feds say, Leland met Carmack and offered to hold up or prevent the city from selling the land in return for $15,000.


“I should ask for 30, but I’m nice to you,” Leland said, according to the indictment.

On June 8, Leland was the only member of the Planning and Economic Development Committee to vote against putting the sale of the property on the City Council’s agenda.

When the sale went before the entire council on June 13, Leland was the only member to vote against selling it.

On Aug. 2, the feds say, Leland and a part-time campaign worker, Elisa Grubbs, met with Carmack at his collision shop on Michigan Avenue.

What Leland and Grubbs didn’t know was that Carmack was recording their encounters.

Carmack later told a reporter he was upset with Leland because the councilman hit him up for cash at the same time Carmack was caring for his dying father.

So Carmack went to the FBI.

“I put a wire on. I wore it, had a meeting with Mr. Leland, and Mr. Leland asked me would I raise some money for his campaign, and he asked me would I give him $15,000 if he didn’t sell that lot,” Carmack told the reporter.

Fishman told the reporter Carmack's allegation was "a blatant lie" with "absolutely no basis for it in fact."

On Aug. 4, prosecutors say, Leland told Carmack to give Grubbs the money. Carmack said he gave Grubbs $7,500 he got from the feds.

“I asked her, I said: ‘This is for Gabe Leland?’ ” Carmack later told a reporter. “She goes, ‘Yes, it’s for Gabe Leland. It definitely ain’t for me.’ ”

The feds say Grubbs gave the money to Leland later that day.

Five days later, according to the indictment, Leland met Carmack downtown at the Caucus Club restaurant and said he got the $7,500, but not the second half of the deal. Carmack said he told Leland he didn’t know Grubbs.

“No, but you can f***in’ trust me,” Leland replied, according to the indictment. “That’s all that matters.”

In June 2018 — nearly a year after Leland allegedly accepted the marked money from Carmack, but months before he would be indicted — Leland was questioned under oath during a deposition stemming from a lawsuit Carmack filed.

Fishman represented Leland at the deposition, interrupting the questioning to tell Carmack’s attorney: “I’m advising Mr. Leland to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege for any questions having to do with Robert Carmack.”

Nevertheless, Carmack’s attorney asked Leland: “At any time in 2017 did you extort up to $15,000 from Mr. Robert Carmack?”

Leland replied: “I refuse to answer the question based on my Fifth Amendment rights.”


The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says a person cannot be compelled to testify against their interest or provide information that may incriminate them.

Leland declined to answer any questions about whether he was being investigated by the feds.

On Oct. 3, 2018, the feds charged Grubbs with conspiracy to help “City Official X” solicit a bribe.

Any question about the identity of “City Official X” was dispelled the next day, when Leland was indicted on bribery and conspiracy charges.

"A sitting member of the Detroit City Council engaging in bribery is an extreme breach of the trust of the people of Detroit that badly undermines their faith in local government," Schneider, the U.S. attorney, said in a statement released that day. "As was starkly demonstrated by the prosecution of former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and several corrupt members of his administration, federal law enforcement is dedicated to rooting out and severely punishing corruption at every level of city governance.”

At the time, Mayor Mike Duggan called the allegations "deeply upsetting and disappointing."

"This is a very unfortunate development for our city at a time when so many things have been going right," Duggan said in a statement. "For now, we just have to let our justice system do its work."

The City Council released a joint statement the day after Leland was indicted, saying it will not affect its work and that the body "will continue to do our jobs, as elected by the citizens of this city."

On Oct. 9, after the first full council meeting since his indictment, Leland met with reporters outside the council chambers on the 13th floor of City Hall.

“I’m innocent until proven guilty and that’s my statement until further comment,” he said.

Six days later, Leland was arraigned in the federal courthouse, one block away from the Caucus Club where the feds say he met with Carmack. As he walked away from the courthouse, Leland said: “I’m innocent, and I’m looking forward to trial.”

If Leland pleads guilty to a felony charge, it would end his career on City Council.

Under the Detroit City Charter, an elected official who “engages in official misconduct,” “corrupt conduct in office” or pleads to “or is convicted of a felony while holding office” forfeits their office.

Neither the City Council nor the city’s Board of Ethics has taken any action to remove Leland or limit his authority.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, May 18, 2020

All Ratlines Lead To Detroit - Let The Networks Be Elucidated

The feds are going to allow Gabe Leland a plea deal after all that drama Bob Carmack has gone through?

Well, this should be fun because the feds are passing the task of due process off to Macomb County Prosecutor's Office?

I thought there were child welfare issues over there in the Macomb County Prosecutor's Office?

I believe there are election issues over there in the Macomb County Prosecutor's Office.

I bet the referral case will be dropped, triggering another federal action, because you know we are dealing with "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

How come no one will discuss the role of the Detroit Land Bank Authority in this case?

I wanted to see the process of impeaching testimony, but I believe there is more entertainment afoot.

Of course, more than 90% of cases end in plea deals, because 90% of defendants have no money for justice and prosecutors love those notches on their belts, as opposed to the execution of justice.

All ratlines lead to Detroit, let the networks be elucidated because they are dark and very deep.

Bribery case against Detroit councilman could end in plea deal 3 years after he took money

Bob Carmack talks extortion and Gabe Leland Detroit Free Press

Three years after Gabe Leland allegedly shook down a businessman, the Detroit city councilman’s bribery case could end with a plea deal — or a new felony charge in state court.

Leland was indicted on three counts of bribery on Oct. 4, 2018, after a federal grand jury determined he demanded $15,000 in May 2017 from a businessman in a land dispute with the city. Leland, who represents District 7 on the city’s west side, continues to serve on the City Council without any restrictions.

Steve Fishman, Leland’s attorney, had vowed to take the case to trial — where he planned to attack the credibility of the government’s key witness. But recent court records signed by prosecutors and Fishman say “the parties have discussed a resolution of the matter and need additional time to determine whether a resolution is possible.”

The matter could even be resolved in state court, after the federal government asked a Michigan prosecutor to take the case. Monroe County Michael Roehrig is reviewing the feds' evidence and considering whether to charge Leland.

For now, Leland's immediate concern is the federal case. The request made last month to reschedule Leland’s trial in U.S. District Court on public corruption charges was at least the fifth time prosecutors and Fishman asked for more time. It’s not unusual for both sides to seek a delay in the start of a trial, but it wasn't until Feb. 14 that they mentioned a possible resolution. They cited a possible deal again on April 17, the most recent filing in the case.

Fishman declined to comment beyond saying: "That is boiler-plate language that appears in any number of stipulated orders adjourning trials in federal court.”

Leland did not return messages. U.S. Attorney Matthew Schneider declined comment.

Former federal prosecutors, who asked not to be named because they worked with the prosecutors handling the Leland case, say assistant U.S. attorneys in this jurisdiction would not make up a reason to push back a trial date. One reason is concern that a judge could later ask them to provide evidence to support their claim.

Larry Dubin, emeritus professor of law at the University of Detroit-Mercy, said: “It’s very common for plea negotiations to take place the closer you get to trial.”

He added that a defense attorney might not want to acknowledge plea negotiations because he “would not want prospective jurors to know a defendant is contemplating a plea, which could reflect on guilt.”

Dubin estimated that at least 90% of prosecutions in federal court end with a plea. Fishman said the percentage is even higher.

"Most cases over here — 95% — result in a guilty plea," Fishman said outside U.S. District Court after Leland was arraigned on Oct. 15, 2018. "This one won't."

Cash for the councilman
Leland’s troubles date back to May 12, 2017, when prosecutors say Leland spoke to Detroit businessman Bob Carmack about land on Michigan Avenue that Carmack and the city each claimed. Leland, who was chairman of the City Council’s Planning and Economic Development Committee, stopped the city from selling the land.

Bob Carmack in the front office of his body shop on Michigan Avenue in Detroit on Tuesday, October 23, 2018.

Bob Carmack in the front office of his body shop on Michigan Avenue in Detroit on Tuesday, October 23, 2018.  (Photo: Eric Seals, Detroit Free Press)

“I held it up again,” Leland allegedly told Carmack during a phone call. “Yeah, yeah, it stayed, stayed right, right in committee, brother.”

Later in the call, federal prosecutors say Leland told Carmack: “You didn’t show up to my fundraiser.”

Four days later, the feds say, Leland met Carmack and offered to hold up or prevent the city from selling the land in return for $15,000.

“I should ask for 30, but I’m nice to you,” Leland said, according to the indictment.

On June 8, Leland was the only member of the Planning and Economic Development Committee to vote against putting the sale of the property on the City Council’s agenda.


When the sale went before the entire council on June 13, Leland was the only member to vote against selling it.

On Aug. 2, the feds say, Leland and a part-time campaign worker, Elisa Grubbs, met with Carmack at his collision shop on Michigan Avenue.

What Leland and Grubbs didn’t know was that Carmack was recording their encounters.

Carmack later told a reporter he was upset with Leland because the councilman hit him up for cash at the same time Carmack was caring for his dying father.

So Carmack went to the FBI.

“I put a wire on. I wore it, had a meeting with Mr. Leland, and Mr. Leland asked me would I raise some money for his campaign, and he asked me would I give him $15,000 if he didn’t sell that lot,” Carmack told the reporter.

Fishman told the reporter Carmack's allegation was "a blatant lie" with "absolutely no basis for it in fact."

On Aug. 4, prosecutors say, Leland told Carmack to give Grubbs the money. Carmack said he gave Grubbs $7,500 he got from the feds.

“I asked her, I said: ‘This is for Gabe Leland?’ ” Carmack later told a reporter. “She goes, ‘Yes, it’s for Gabe Leland. It definitely ain’t for me.’ ”

The feds say Grubbs gave the money to Leland later that day.

Five days later, according to the indictment, Leland met Carmack downtown at the Caucus Club restaurant and said he got the $7,500, but not the second half of the deal. Carmack said he told Leland he didn’t know Grubbs.

“No, but you can f***in’ trust me,” Leland replied, according to the indictment. “That’s all that matters.”

In June 2018 — nearly a year after Leland allegedly accepted the marked money from Carmack, but months before he would be indicted — Leland was questioned under oath during a deposition stemming from a lawsuit Carmack filed.

From left, Detroit City Councilman Gabe Leland leaves the U.S. District Court with lawyer Steve Fishman after being arraigned on bribery charges, entering a plea of not guilty in Detroit, Mich., Monday, Oct 15, 2018.


From left, Detroit City Councilman Gabe Leland leaves the U.S. District Court with lawyer Steve Fishman after being arraigned on bribery charges, entering a plea of not guilty in Detroit, Mich., Monday, Oct 15, 2018.  (Photo: Kathleen Galligan, Detroit Free Press)

Fishman represented Leland at the deposition, interrupting the questioning to tell Carmack’s attorney: “I’m advising Mr. Leland to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege for any questions having to do with Robert Carmack.”

Nevertheless, Carmack’s attorney asked Leland: “At any time in 2017 did you extort up to $15,000 from Mr. Robert Carmack?”

Leland replied: “I refuse to answer the question based on my Fifth Amendment rights.”


The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says a person cannot be compelled to testify against their interest or provide information that may incriminate them.

Leland declined to answer any questions about whether he was being investigated by the feds.

On Oct. 3, 2018, the feds charged Grubbs with conspiracy to help “City Official X” solicit a bribe.

Any question about the identity of “City Official X” was dispelled the next day, when Leland was indicted on bribery and conspiracy charges.

"A sitting member of the Detroit City Council engaging in bribery is an extreme breach of the trust of the people of Detroit that badly undermines their faith in local government," Schneider, the U.S. attorney, said in a statement released that day. "As was starkly demonstrated by the prosecution of former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and several corrupt members of his administration, federal law enforcement is dedicated to rooting out and severely punishing corruption at every level of city governance.”

At the time, Mayor Mike Duggan called the allegations "deeply upsetting and disappointing."

"This is a very unfortunate development for our city at a time when so many things have been going right," Duggan said in a statement. "For now, we just have to let our justice system do its work."

The City Council released a joint statement the day after Leland was indicted, saying it will not affect its work and that the body "will continue to do our jobs, as elected by the citizens of this city."

On Oct. 9, after the first full council meeting since his indictment, Leland met with reporters outside the council chambers on the 13th floor of City Hall.


“I’m innocent until proven guilty and that’s my statement until further comment,” he said.

Six days later, Leland was arraigned in the federal courthouse, one block away from the Caucus Club where the feds say he met with Carmack. As he walked away from the courthouse, Leland said: “I’m innocent, and I’m looking forward to trial.”

Odd twist
While it would not be uncommon for a public corruption case to end with a plea deal, there is one aspect of the Leland case that experts said is highly unusual.

In late January — a few weeks before prosecutors and Fishman submitted the paperwork saying they were exploring a deal and asking for another delay in the start of the trial — Schneider asked Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy to take the case.

Worthy passed. Her spokeswoman, Maria Miller, said Carmack’s role as a “significant witness” for the federal prosecution posed a problem for her office.

“WCPO has a conflict of interest in other cases involving Mr. Carmack and as a result she declined to prosecute this case,” Miller said.

Worthy first claimed a conflict in 2018, when Detroit Police sought fraud charges against Carmack for selling land once owned by the city. At the time, Carmack was suing the county treasurer, which Worthy said created a conflict because the treasurer is involved in funding her office. The Michigan Attorney General's Office assigned the matter to the Genesee County prosecutor, who charged Carmack with fraud. The case is scheduled for trial later this year.

Dubin, Wayne State University Law professor Peter Henning and former federal prosecutors said the U.S. Attorney's Office sometimes refers cases to a state prosecutor, but it’s rare to do so after a defendant has been indicted and a trial date is set.


They speculated that it could be a sign prosecutors are concerned about some aspect of their case.

One of the former prosecutors added, however, that federal prosecutors would be reluctant to unload a weak case on a state prosecutor because it could damage their working relationship in the future.

The Michigan Attorney General’s Office sent the case to Monroe County. Roehrig, the prosecutor, said: “We are reviewing the case and, when we’ve reached a decision, we will issue charges.”

Roehrig said the case landed on his desk in early March and that, because of the coronavirus crisis, it may be awhile before his office makes a ruling. He would not say whether he would prosecute beyond noting that his office would only bring felony charges.

Roehrig says it’s possible his office could decide not to charge Leland. It’s not clear how federal prosecutors would react to that. Their case is scheduled for trial in federal court later this summer, but it is unlikely to go forward if Leland is charged in state court.

The stakes for Leland are high, with his reputation, job and freedom on the line. If convicted of bribery in U.S. District Court, he faces up to 10 years in prison.

Under the Detroit City Charter, an elected official who “engages in official misconduct,” “corrupt conduct in office” or pleads to “or is convicted of a felony while holding office” forfeits their office.

Neither the City Council nor the city’s Board of Ethics has taken any action to remove Leland or limit his authority.

Council relations
On Oct. 9, 2018 — his first council session since his indictment — Leland said he was “innocent until proven guilty” and “it's business as usual for me. I will be out in the community, responding to community concerns.”

Council President Brenda Jones, who did not respond to a request for comment after Leland was indicted, also did not respond to a recent request for comment on the possible resolution of Leland’s case, which has left the councilman operating under a cloud for more than 1½ years.

It’s unclear whether the indictment has affected Leland’s effectiveness on City Council. He is no longer chairman of the Planning and Economic Development Committee. But with nine council members and only four committees, chairmanships change regularly.

One council member, who did not want to be identified to avoid creating friction on council, professed to avoiding Leland because of the indictment.

City Council, unlike the Legislature or Congress, is less likely to move issues forward by coming together to co-sponsor ordinances or other measures. Some members focus mainly on constituent concerns and issues in their districts.

Councilwoman Janeé Ayers, who, along with Jones, represents all Detroiters as one of the council’s two at-large members, praised Leland’s focus.

“Gabe has not allowed this to stop him from doing his job,” she said. “I admire his tenacity to continue to push forward.”

Echoing at least one of her colleagues, Ayers said: “He’s still the same person that I met over seven years ago.”

Duggan declined comment.

The Carmack conundrum
Carmack — and his recordings — are the linchpins in the case against Leland.

Over the last two years, Carmack went from politically connected but little-known collision shop owner to flamboyant gadfly.

He made headlines in November 2018 by renting a mobile billboard and parking it in front of City Hall during rush hour to broadcast video his private investigators shot of Duggan making evening visits to the suburban home of a woman who was not his wife. The woman was a Wayne State University doctor who helped run a nonprofit program created to reduce infant mortality. Duggan supported the program. Duggan declined to comment on the nature of their relationship, and asked Michigan State Police to investigate whether Carmack tried to extort him. Months after Duggan's visits to the doctor's home were revealed, the mayor and his wife divorced. State police declined to charge Carmack with a crime. On several occasions, he paid to have banners questioning Duggan’s relationship flown over sporting events.

In December 2018, as Carmack and the city waged multiple lawsuits against each other over his land deals, prosecutors charged Carmack with fraud. They alleged that he sold city-owned land for $1 million. Carmack countered that the city gave him the land to make up for another failed city land deal. The case is scheduled to go to trial in Wayne County Circuit Court later this year.

In December 2019, Carmack was charged with drunken driving, third offense.

Brownstown Township police said that around 2:30 a.m. on Oct. 27, 2019, they saw Carmack stumbling after leaving Champions Sports Grill. They said he had bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and told them “I'm drunk" multiple times before walking back into the bar.

About two minutes later, according to a police report, Carmack came back out and started his red Corvette before police stopped him in the parking lot.

Police say Carmack refused a field sobriety test and a blood test. After obtaining a warrant to draw his blood, police said the result came back at .257 — more than three times above the legal limit of .08.

At his arraignment, Carmack pleaded not guilty.

Henning, the Wayne State professor, is also a former federal prosecutor. He said the U.S. Attorney's office may have misgivings about Carmack.

“Do you really want to put Bob Carmack on the witness stand?” Henning said. “He’s not going to be the best witness on earth.”

Fishman said after Leland was arraigned in October 2018 that he would pummel Carmack on the witness stand. Referring to an interview Carmack gave several months earlier, Fishman said: “Let’s go to court and we’ll have a trial with a judge and a jury and the same witness who sat for the softball interview will get cross examined.

“And I guarantee you, there won’t be softball questions on cross-examination.”

Henning said Carmack’s character would not be as important as the recordings he made for the FBI.

“When they have electronic surveillance, they’re going to play those,” he said of prosecutors. “And that’s going to kill Leland.”

Fishman, who has heard the recordings, disagreed.

Speaking after Leland's arraignment, Fishman said: “It doesn’t sound like what they think it sounds like, as far as I’m concerned.”

It’s unclear what role Grubbs will play in the prosecution. Prosecutors initially thought they had worked out a plea deal with Grubbs. But she failed to show up for court, got a new lawyer, and is planning to fight the charges.

Grubbs and Leland — at least for now — are scheduled to go to trial in federal court on Aug. 17.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, April 17, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: Leland Trial Postponed To August - The Hot Summer Of Detroit

Elisa Grubbs no longer has her Fat Ass Boo Boo.,
Whatever shall she do,
With her manufactured #MeToo?

There shall be feast and merriment throughout the land for the heavens are falling.

Justice comes in many shapes and forms when the beauty of theurgy is perfected.

Just as a matter of record, April 14, 2020, Marcus Bryant, a former National Guard who was in Germany, severely suffering from a mental health access, was on my property, ranting and screaming that he talked to Kym Worthy that my case "is over and I need to stop blogging".

He also raved that he was "sent" to let me know the Detroit Land Bank Authority is coming after me because I got people in alot of trouble.

I called the police.

They were fun and very professional as keepers of the public record.

I felt sorry for them having to gear up in gloves and masks.

I requested referral for services for him, as I had previously tried to get Marcus into services, but, due to the cooties, none of the hospitals were taking homeless individuals with mental illness.

Not all mentally want to go into restricted care because they know they will become lab rats.

There are many homeless in my neighborhood, or rather the Municipal Historic District 7 of Russel Woods-Sullivan, where Gabe Leland is my City Councilman.

There are lots of blighted, dangerous properties, denied their architectural legacies of miniature mansions of brick and stained lead glass, an usurpation of history, all because TARP was such a success in its operations for stealing' the children, land & vote.

A neighbor told me Marcus lives in and out the abandoned properties on my street, pacing back and forth in front of my house, where,  I have no reason to disbelieve anything he told me, where, he, too, was on a mission, said with a grimacing growl.

We are going to be shutdown for quite some time.

The global coronavirus pandemic has closed federal court to the public.

#maytheheavensfall

Leland corruption trial delayed again amid COVID-19

Gabe Leland
Gabe Leland
Detroit — A federal judge on Friday postponed the corruption trial of Detroit City Councilman Gabe Leland for a seventh time, citing several reasons that include the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.

U.S. District Judge Judith Levy postponed the May trial to Aug. 17. The postponement follows previous delays to scheduling issues involving witnesses, potential plea negotiations and evidence gathered by the government during a years-long investigation involving Leland and campaign staffer Elisa Grubbs.

The global coronavirus pandemic has closed federal court to the public.

Gabe LelandBuy Photo
Gabe Leland (Photo: Max Ortiz, The Detroit News)

Leland, a 37-year-old Democrat, is the highest-ranking Detroit politician charged with a federal crime since former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick was indicted a decade ago and subsequently sentenced to 28 years in federal prison.

Federal agents and the U.S. Attorney's Office have targeted public corruption during a more than decade-long crackdown in Metro Detroit that has led to charges against more than 110 politicians, bureaucrats, police officers and union officials.

Driven by Greed: An interactive view of Metro Detroit corruption

Leland was charged with bribery in a three-count indictment in October 2018 and accused of agreeing to accept $15,000 and free car repairs from Detroit businessman Robert Carmack.

If convicted, Leland could face up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each bribery count and five years for bribery conspiracy.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, February 7, 2020

Detroit Sues Top Slumlords, Except The Detroit Land Bank Authority

Hmmmm.......

If City of Detroit Corporate Counsel, Larry Garcia is suing the top three Detroit landlords for blight and health hazards; where the Detroit Land Bank Authority is the largest Detroit property owner; then, how come the Detroit Land Bank Authority is not named in this action?

Oh, wait, I know!

If Larry names the Detroit Land Bank Authority, as a party to the action, then, that would mean that the Detroit Land Bank Authority is not a part of the City of Detroit, meaning it is a private operation, and, as such, would have to provide its corporate parent disclosures and instruments of authority, of which was dissolved by Bill Schutte, some time back, in the State Court of Claims, when he has his legal lackey enter into the record that I was a public nuisance.

Uh, oh.

I, also, seem to recall that Carmack case, that is coming up relatively soon for trial, where no one wants to talk about the Detroit Land Bank Authority being in that chain of command of the deed to the property Larry is claiming was stolen from the City, when there has yet to be an explanation of how the Detroit Land Bank Authority acquired the property, in the first place, considering that it was never incorporated, despite Janice Winfrey taking it upon herself to declare incorporation, because she is almighty and stuff, because someone from JonesDay told her so.

But, then again, it could have been someone from Perkins Coie Sucks, or both.

Hey, what do I know?

I know if Larry is not going to go after the largest blight owner in the City of Detroit, that made itself a creditor in the Detroit Bankruptcy, by settling fake ass debts with properties that were fraudulently foreclosed upon, through fake taxes, where the Detroit Land Bank Authority has a history of levying fake ass taxes with their fake ass, made up powers of authority, because it never incorporated, and pilfered all the Hardest Hit Funds out the country into their own personal ventures through children's trust funds, to run back into the U.S. to fund political campaigns, because, if he did, he is going to have to do battle with Butch Hollowell and the lot.

If I had the energy, I would file to intervene, just because Larry is not going after the Detroit Land Bank Authority, but I will not, simply for the fact that I know how this is going to end.

#maytheheavensfall

Detroit sues landlords for blight and health hazards


DETROIT (FOX 2) - The city of Detroit is suing three notorious landlords for neglect, blight and health hazards.

Detroit says the property owners might have 1,000 properties combined all across the city.

City of Detroit goes after slum lords with lawsuits
The city of Detroit is suing three notorious landlords for neglect, blight and health hazards

FOX 2 went to look at three properties on the list filed in Wayne County Circuit Court against Steve and Stephen Hagerman a father and son team, Salameh Jaser and Michael Kelly.

They have earned a title from the city we're sure they don't want - some of the city's most notorious speculators and slumlords.

FOX 2 tried to track them down, stopping at Michael Kelly's office Friday. So far we haven't been able to reach them for comment.

The city says it took legal action because according to them, these folks buy up a bunch of properties and rent them out - even though they were never brought up to code.

They are dilapidated homes that often have serious and terrible health and safety risks like peeling lead paint. The city says the folks above have piles of tickets for not following the rules, and this is a new approach.

"This is a new tactic to attack a business model that is particularly pernicious," said Lawrence Garcia, Detroit city attorney.

Pernicious because they invest and neglect - but in some cases the properties are vacant.

"The notion of a public nuisance, the notion that these properties present an unreasonable danger to the public grossly - I think that is an idea whose time has come."

In the lawsuits the city asks the court to declare the business model a public nuisance and make owners keep their properties up, stopping them from buying more properties until they get their act together.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, December 23, 2019

Bob Carmack Contained


I got this off the twat of the Detroit Corporate Counsel Larry Garcia.

He hates Carmack and he hates me.

Carmack has been wearing an FBI wire for the last two years, made public in the news.

So, you mean to tell me he is going to be arrested for an officer "seeing" he was too drunk, and he never drove because the police, who just happened to all be there, block him in? I see protective custody.

Awaiting for my grande entrance....

Duggan foe Robert Carmack charged with felony drunken driving

Robert Carmack poses for a photo in an office at his car repair shop on Detroit's near west side on October 18, 2018.
Bob Carmack
Robert Carmack, the businessman who has feuded with Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan, is in more legaltrouble.

Carmack was charged last week with felony drunken driving, third offense, for an incident Oct. 27 in Brownstown Township.

Carmack was leaving Champions Sports Grill when a police officer saw him and told him he was too intoxicated to drive, said Carmack's lawyer, Ed Zelenak. Carmack later went back into his car and police blocked him in.

Zelenak said Carmack's blood was drawn but he doesn't know the results. Zelenak declined further comment.

Carmack, 60, of Woodhaven, was arraigned Dec. 20 and a not guilty plea was entered. A preliminary exam is scheduled for Jan. 7.

Carmack could not be reached for comment.

Read more: Detroit businessman Robert Carmack to stand trial for 4 felonies tied to land deal

Read more: Meet Robert Carmack, the guy agitating Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel charged Carmack because the Wayne County Prosecutor's office recused itself from the case.

The drunken driving charge comes as Carmack awaits trial in a separate criminal case.

Carmack was charged with four felonies last year on accusations he fraudulently sold property in Detroit that he didn't own in 2016 for $1 million.

Lawyers for Carmack have said he believed he owned the property because he had an executed deed for it, a closing statement and a tax bill in his company's name.

Carmack was charged for the land deal shortly after he received publicity for his dramatic feud with Duggan.

Carmack hired a private eye last year to follow and record the mayor’s movements away from city hall. The surveillance footage showed Duggan arriving after hours at the same suburban residence as Sonia Hassan, a Wayne State University physician Duggan had handpicked to help address the city’s infant mortality problem. Carmack then used a giant video monitor outside city hall in November 2018 to broadcast the edited footage of Duggan and Hassan.

Duggan did not take Carmack’s stunt lightly. Less than two weeks after the surveillance footage was shown, the mayor called a news conference to request a State Police investigation into what he considered to be threats from Carmack. State Police interviewed Duggan and other city officials before closing the case without taking action, according to a police report obtained in January via an open records request.

By the time it was reported that the State Police investigation was closed, Carmack had been charged with the four felonies for the Detroit property sale.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Gabe Leland Trial Set For March 23, 2019 - Deadline Detroit Narrowly Reports

Odd.

The article failed to identify Elissa Grubbs and what her relationships are.

There were no mentions of the 2016 or 2018 jacked-legged precinct polling station debacles, or the absentee ballot lot addresses of the Detroit Land Bank Authority, or even Special Election.

What about SIGTARP?

You know I have to give a shout out to SIGTARP, for they ultimately protect our most precious treasures.

This was very narrow reporting because everything I have just questioned is in the public domain.

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=gabe+leland

I am very disappointed with this piece and have no choice but to grant Deadline Detroit an C+.

2019 Recap: Detroit Councilman Gabe Leland Could Be Headed To Prison — How Did This Happen?

We revisit 2019 news highlights each weekend this month, concluding with a Top 10 countdown starting Dec. 22. This originally was published Jan. 1.

► Update: Gabe Leland's trial on three federal bribery charges is scheduled to start March 23.

Detroit City Council member Gabe Leland was looking down, his brow furrowed in thought.

It was June 7 [2018] and he was in the hot seat, fielding questions in a downtown office building during a deposition stemming from a bribe he’d allegedly taken from a local businessman.

Featured_lelandfeature_33675
Gabe Leland
Bob Carmack — now a well-known city government agitator — had sued Leland, alleging he demanded $15,000 and auto body work in exchange for a political favor. The incident has since led to Leland’s indictment.

The stress was starting to show on the embattled councilman. Dark under-eye bags sagged below his cheekbones; he seemed to have lost hair.

Leland had blown by questions pertaining to Carmack; pleading the Fifth in what looked like a game of call-and-response. But now, as the questioning shifted to whether he’d also taken bribes from somebody else, Leland appeared stumped.

“Have you ever received a monetary or other bribe from Dennis Archer Jr. for your vote on any issue that came before Detroit City Council pertaining to any business that he was involved in?” Carmack’s lawyer, Andrew Paterson, asked.

Leland looked down. A full 10 seconds passed before he asked that the question be repeated.

“Have you ever received a monetary or other bribe from Dennis Archer Jr. for your vote on any issue that came before the Detroit City Council pertaining to any business that he was involved within the city?” asked Paterson.

Leland looked down again. Six more seconds went by.

“Can you ask the question — a-ask the question again, please?” he stammered.

Paterson tried a third time. Leland waited some more before pleading the Fifth.

As he faces a crisis that could end his political career and land him in prison for more than 10 years, Leland appears in over his head. The 36-year-old is not known for being cunning or even particularly sharp; he was first elected by trading on his politician father’s name and has maintained only a precarious grip on power in the years since.

Though it’s unclear what, exactly, may have driven him to accept a cash bribe in the form a campaign contribution, as prosecutors and a lawsuit allege, a look back at Leland’s political career reveals a pattern of morally questionable and even arrogant behavior that may have served as the foundation for future misdeeds.

The political playbook he used belonged to his father, Burton Leland, but, as many people close to the councilman tell it, he lacked his father’s skill in execution.

“The name of the game he was a part of was poli-tricks,” said Wayne County Commissioner Reggie Davis, a friend of the father and son. “It’s a type of game (where) if you’re not really ready to play it, then you’ll mess up. But it was his father’s game. Gabe never really wanted to be involved.”

Leland did not respond to multiple interview requests for this report.

His father’s son

Gabe Leland was born in Detroit in 1982, just as Burton Leland was embarking on a 37-year political career in which he’d never once face defeat.

Burton was elected more than a dozen times to represent a portion of the west side of Detroit, first in the state Legislature, then in the Wayne County Commission. But voters did not bet on him to be a political power broker; in his more than two decades in Lansing, the elder Leland was known for passing only one law. An ex-social worker, he instead maintained support by tending to the day-to-day needs of the people in his district. If a stolen car, for example, wound up parked on a constituent’s property, he’d contact the local police precinct to have it removed, free of charge.

“He was the epitome of ‘do the job,’” said Tony Bradford, who was Burton’s close friend and former campaign manager. “He’d never leave a resident’s house without helping them, he wouldn’t even want to give them another number to call. And chances are, if you take care of something for someone, they’re gonna vote for you the rest of your life.”

Those Burton helped were so loyal to him that, once, when he was locked in a tight reelection battle, Bradford recalls hearing an old woman say she’d “shoot the shit out of” anyone who tried to steal her Leland yard sign.

In 2004, Burton leveraged his success to get a then-23-year-old Gabe elected to a Michigan House seat in a district to which he had little connection.

Gabe, as Davis tells it, was "looking for some stuff to do" and was encouraged by his father to get involved in government.

“He said, ‘Hey, I can help you win,’” said Davis.

What happened next roils critics of the Lelands to this day. Gabe, who spent most of his childhood in East Lansing, near his father’s work, and attended college at Ferris State University in Big Rapids, entered a primary against six African-American candidates to represent Detroit’s 10th state House District.

His candidate profile listed limited credentials: Leland had knocked doors for his dad’s campaigns and helped with voter registration drives. But the profile prominently featured a half-truth, opening with, “Gabe was born and raised on Detroit's west side.”

Not mentioned was a detail that would have hampered the chances of a young candidate with a different last name: Just before he turned 20, Leland was charged with back-to-back marijuana crimes, one for dealing. Both cases were dismissed, reportedly, after intervention by his father.


Gabe Leland, left, and his father, Burton Leland, in an undated photo taken in the state Capitol. (Photo: Gabe Leland's 2013 campaign site)
In spite of all this, Gabe registered at an address in the district — his dad’s buddy’s house — and went on to win a decisive primary by just under 230 votes. He’d arrive at the Capitol grossly underqualified: LaMar Lemmons, a former state rep who served alongside Leland in the Detroit delegation, recalled that, when asked about the schools in his district, Leland couldn’t name a single one.

Critics paying attention were stunned by the Lelands’ audacity.

“They felt they owned that part of Detroit,” said a former lawmaker who served in the Legislature with them and asked to remain anonymous. “It stems from a sense of arrogance, which is at the DNA of Gabe’s political makeup. But I just can't blame him all the way. I mean, he learned everything he knows about this business and how he does it from his father.”

Still his father’s son

Burton, though by and large beloved by voters, was, according to Bradford, “paranoid” about maintaining power and willing to play dirty when he thought he needed to. That meant going negative, running black candidates in his own races to “dilute the black vote,” according to Lemmons, and sometimes paying someone who shared a last name with his strongest opponent to register to appear on the ballot and siphon some votes.

Similar tactics emerged in Gabe’s time in the state House, and now city council.

Leland created a rift with his Detroit colleagues in 2006, when he voted for Andy Dillon to be House speaker, despite promising otherwise. Dillon won, and Leland, then just 25, was rewarded with a chairmanship role on the House Committee on Urban Policy. (He pulled a similar move upon joining City Council, serving as the swing vote to name Brenda Jones council president, and in exchange, getting appointed to run the prestigious Planning & Economic Development Committee.)

“He cut a deal behind our backs,” said the ex-lawmaker who asked to remain anonymous. “His loyalty was never so much to the delegation, but to the white male majority within our party, who, sometimes, their interests were different than the Detroiters’.”

Lemmons agreed.

“Gabe’s agenda was the enrichment of Gabe,” he said.

When he ran for council in 2013, after term limits forced him out of the state House, Leland resorted to some slimy political maneuvers to eke out a win against a formidable adversary, Detroit police officer John Bennett.

First, Leland is believed to have tried to eliminate Bennett in the primary by running a Robb Bennett — an apparent dummy candidate who, according to John Bennett, was a friend of Burton’s. Robb Bennett pulled in 400 votes, almost enough to keep John Bennett from advancing to the general. Leland then sent out a negative mailer to voters in the district. It pictured an ice cream cone and described “the John Bennett Triple Dip.” Bennett, the mailer said, had taken “three scoops” from taxpayers: He had sued the city and won, was collecting a pension and now wanted another check in the form of a council salary. In reality, Bennett had sued to get his job back after he was wrongfully terminated for creating a website that criticized a police chief, who eventually resigned in disgrace. Bennett also wasn’t collecting a pension; he was still a police officer.

Bennett chalks up his loss, in part, to Leland’s shady political tactics and last-minute support from now-Mayor Mike Duggan, whom Leland worked for while the mayor was president of the Detroit Medical Center. (A spokesperson for Duggan disputed this, saying the mayor did not support any other candidates in 2013.) But he believes an additional, racial element was at play.

“We were coming off a time where a lot of black elected officials participated in malfeasance,” said Bennett, who was a vocal critic of the Kwame administration. “At the same time I was running for council, Benny Napoleon was running for mayor against Mike Duggan and I can tell you the general feeling amongst a lot of people in the city is that they were tired and weary of that leadership and that leadership happened to be black.”

The irony that Detroiters saw a person they could trust in Leland is not lost on Bennett.

“Here we sit today with a council member who is now in trouble with the law, and I can tell you as someone who lives in the community that there's a lot of concern from people about their representation,” he said.

“Goob”

Though Leland has taken great pains to fill his father’s shoes — pushing some progressive policies and going back to school to earn a degree in community service at Central Michigan University — residents in his district are quick to point out he’s fallen short. They complain he hasn’t addressed their quality-of-life issues to the extent his father did, and some believe he’s sold them out to downtown developers.

But residents also speak to Gabe’s likability, or lack thereof. He’s less personable than his father was, less charismatic, and nowhere near as sharp.

“I thought his dad was a much better politician,” said 7th District Police Commissioner William Davis. “I don’t know how to put it politely, but I think he was better at thinking on his feet.”

Indeed, Leland does not have the polish of even an average politician. He relies on long, rambling sentences laced with “ums” to convey simple ideas and, when speaking publicly, has a habit of rolling his eyes upward in the middle of a statement as if grasping for what to say next. He appears easily distracted, and it’s not difficult, when scrolling through council videos, to find him disengaged, fidgeting with a pen or transfixed by a speck of dirt on his tie. His demeanor has earned him the nickname of “Goob” with some reporters.

Others point out Leland’s gaffes. In 2017, when an activist from his district blasted councilmembers for voting to allow city employees to buy Land Bank-owned homes at a discount — homes that in many cases came into the government’s possession only after their owners were displaced by tax foreclosure — Leland defended the program for growing the city’s tax base, but also for allowing city employees to “get a piece of the pie.” Bennett described Leland as socially inept, recalling an incident when, during an election cycle, Leland knocked on his door and pressed him on why his wife wasn’t listed as living at the home. Bennett had recently been divorced.

“Just jaw-dropping goofiness,” said Bennett.

Carmack, the star witness in the bribery case against Leland, alleged that Leland tried to squeeze him for money while Carmack was tending to his dying father in the hospital. He says Leland even asked to meet him there. 

“This guy’s insane,” said Carmack. “There’s nothing normal about this guy.”

Featured_abandoned_street_33650
Blight is common in District 7. (Photo: Violet Ikonomova)
Leland also appears to embrace the job’s more morally objectionable perks. He’s developed a reputation for soliciting expensive meals from lobbyists and other donors. While serving in Lansing, campaign finance records show he was cashing in on free meals from lobbyists at a much higher rate than his colleagues — more than $1,400 in free food per year, on average. Leland is also alleged in a federal lawsuit to have extorted thousands of dollars in free food, booze, and entry to parties in exchange for promising a downtown Detroit bar owner political influence. (Isaac Robinson, a former Leland council staffer who was recently elected to the Michigan House, rejected the characterization of Leland as solicitous, saying lobbyists were more likely chasing him.)

Whose representative?

As bad as the alleged misbehavior has been, a more basic complaint about Leland from block-club presidents and community leaders in his district pertains to how he does the job he was elected to do. It’s a common one in the city’s neighborhoods amid Detroit’s revival: Leland has forsaken them in favor of building up the city’s downtown.

District 7 is home to some of the highest levels of poverty, crime and blight in the city. Many blocks are riddled with vacant lots and abandoned houses and, on some, there’s not a single occupied home left standing. Median income in the district was $15,000 as of the 2010 Census — not much higher than the federal poverty line — and the average home in its three main zip codes sold for a little over $20,000 last year. On Joy Road, there’s a combination McDonald’s restaurant and gas station that’s seen so many carjackings and killings residents have dubbed it “Murda Mac.”

Residents expressed disappointment with a number of actions taken by Leland during his first term, including a vote to give the Pistons more than $34 million in incentives to move downtown and another to authorize millions in spending for continued water shutoffs. Almost every community leader Deadline Detroit spoke with brought up his role in torpedoing a community benefits ordinance that would have required developers receiving massive tax breaks from the city to provide things like jobs and affordable housing to residents. Leland held up the proposal as chair of the Planning & Economic Development Committee, forcing it to a ballot vote in 2016, where it was defeated after development interests backed a watered-down alternative. Leland counts among his largest campaign contributors the unions providing labor for the downtown construction boom.

“He doesn’t stand for anything,” said Lemmons. “You would expect a white city council member to be like a Maryann Mahaffey — an advocate for the poor and for the disenfranchised. Gabe is none of that. Gabe is for Gabe.”

A caricature, or a man of character?

But the picture of Leland as a morally slippery politician who spends his days OK-ing big downtown deals and nights sipping free cocktails is incomplete.

Featured_leland_foreclosures_33683
Leland has fought to help Detroiters avoid tax foreclosure. (Photo: Twitter)
Unlike his father, Leland has opted to live in humble digs in the district he represents. He does not live in one of District 7’s nicer neighborhoods — he stays near Plymouth and the Southfield Freeway, in a modest bungalow across from a boarded-up, vacant house. It’s the home that belongs to his dad’s friend, the first address he listed in the city when running for office in 2004. Servers at the original Starter’s Bar & Grill, up the street, say he comes in often.

Over the course of his career, Leland has fought for a number of policies that would help the residents of his district. In 2009, during his final term in Lansing, he introduced a pioneering bill to ease requirements for poor people to obtain property tax exemptions to stave off foreclosure. The bill would have allowed the exemptions to be retroactive and required reimbursements for qualifying individuals. Housing advocates have blamed the difficult-to-access exemption for the wrongful foreclosure of thousands of Detroiters and the city recently settled a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, promising improvements.

Leland also called for a moratorium on tax foreclosures when a record number of occupied homes were set to go to auction in 2015. More recently, he crossed the Duggan administration in his vote to eliminate a notary requirement for the poverty exemptions.

Separately, he serves as chair of the city’s disability task force, and added language to an inclusionary housing ordinance requiring developers to make new residential units ADA-compliant.

“In his short time as a council person he’s taken up some issues focused on social justice,” said Robinson. “I think Gabe really has a goal of being a progressive voice.“

Council member Mary Sheffield also offered some positive words about her embattled colleague. Leland, she said, took her under his wing early on, as he had come to the role with previous legislative experience and she was the youngest person on council.

“I can't talk to his personal life or what's going on with him, but my experience with him has been very pleasant,” she said. “He kind of just embraced me ... he definitely treated me like a big brother.”

She also pushed back on the notion that Leland isn’t bright.

“I think Gabe actually is very smart and in my conversations that I have with him, he may not come across as charismatic as most politicians, but ... he knows the issues,” she said. “He's informed, for sure.”

The legal undertow

But the negative perceptions persist — and are further fueled by Leland’s legal troubles.

“He’s misrepresented us in this district,” said Raymon Jackson, a community activist known as the Advocate. “But not only the lack of development and his track record of voting against everything that affects the citizens — on top of that he’s got a federal probe.”

Jackson went on to tick off Leland’s negatives: He voted to approve more than $2 million in city contracts with companies affiliated with his then-girlfriend, Jennifer Fiore, the daughter of Gasper Fiore, who was convicted of bribery a year ago. Leland did not disclose their relationship prior to his votes. When he learned the Fiore family’s towing operation was under federal investigation, he met with Police Chief James Craig to pump him for information, making Craig so uncomfortable he told The Detroit News he “contacted the FBI as soon as [Leland] left the room.”

Then, there are the two federal lawsuits alleging extortion. The one from Carmack alleges Leland sought $15,000 days ahead of the August 2017 primary — at a point when Leland’s campaign coffers were flush and he was facing a weak opponent. This is in addition to the extortion suit brought by the former owner of Centre Park Bar.

And of course, there’s the indictment that backs up much of what Carmack alleges in his suit. Prosecutors have said they have recordings of meetings between Carmack and Leland, one in which he acknowledges receiving an envelope of $7,500 cash from a Leland associate. Leland allegedly said he’d help Carmack with a property dispute in exchange for the money, and hinted he would take more, saying, "I should ask for 30 but I'm nice to you."

Leland’s lawyer, Steve Fishman, declined to comment for this story.

Some wonder what it will take to remove Leland from office.

“Like, what he got to do to? Murder somebody?" asked Jackson. “Ain’t no community he would ever be able to [stay in power in]. Ain't no suburb he could go to and have all this on him.”

And yet, Leland has refused to resign, positioning his sticking around as a favor to the people in his district.

At an October council hearing, he told a constituent who asked him to step down that “residents in District 7 . . . deserve representation.”

In the event of a resignation, the remaining council members would appoint a replacement with a two-thirds vote.

Featured_joanna_and_advocate_33648
Raymon Jackson and Joanna Underwood will soon begin gathering signatures to recall Leland. (Photo: Violet Ikonomova)
Absent a resignation, Leland could be removed from the body if he pleads or is found guilty, or if District 7 residents recall him. Jackson and Detroit Charter Commission member Joanna Underwood plan to soon begin gathering signatures for a recall.

Leland’s colleagues on council have made no effort to reprimand him. They have not called for his investigation and he has not been removed from the committees on which he sits. When the indictment came down, the body issued a statement simply saying that it would “not affect the work of the Detroit City Council. We will continue to do our jobs, as elected by the citizens of this city."

District 2 representative Roy McAllister was the only council member willing to speak on council’s inaction.

“It’s the people that voted him in, so he represents his district. We did not vote him in,” said McAllister. “It’s an issue but, it’s still under [federal] investigation.”

A final push from the old man

Leland’s father died of cancer in February, just as his son's troubles began to unfold. Two months earlier, it emerged that Leland had been named a “target subject” in the same public corruption probe that has ensnared Fiore and other Detroit officials. Shortly after Burton’s death, Carmack filed his extortion suit against Leland, and disclosed he’d worn a wire for the FBI.

From his “deathbed,” Reggie Davis said, Burton Leland tried to ensure his son would be insulated from harm once he was gone.

“Burton tried to help,” said Davis. “He was advising some of the people close to Gabe to help him in certain ways.”

Davis didn’t provide specifics, but Leland’s lawyer, Fishman, is an old high school friend of Burton’s. Bradford, who called Burton “a brother,” said he was asked to come on last December as Gabe’s constituent services director.

People who know Gabe well have different theories for how he wound up in the mess he’s in. Some chalk it up to hubris, others say he simply wasn’t sharp enough to play politics in the way his father did, and slipped down the slope from immoral to illegal.

But there was one thing on which people with differing theories agreed: Gabe wouldn’t be in trouble were his father still around.

“The greatest vulnerability to him now is that his father has transitioned,” said Lemmons. “So now Gabe is really out there by himself.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, November 14, 2019

Duggan v. Gay Dagnogo - Carmack Champions To Free The Detroit Whistleblower Kwame Kilpatrick

I really do not understand what the issue is with Detroit City Council voting to approve mo' money to tear down these properties they intentionally and purposefully blighted because they are all illegitimately elected.

That would make the vote illegitimate, too, but hey, what do I know?

I know I got my Don Diva t-shirt already.





A post shared by Beverly Tran (@tranbeverly) on
I also know many of the members of City Council also got some of those blighted Detroit Land Bank Authority properties the same way Sherry Gay Dagnogo did.

Detroit City Council postpones $250M bond vote, citing serious concerns

Michigan state Rep. Sherry Gay-Dagnogo spoke against the blight demolition bond ahead of council's vote, urging the body to vote it down. City of Detroit, Detroit Free Press

The Detroit City Council peppered Mayor Mike Duggan's administration with several concerns and questions Tuesday about his $250 million blight bond proposal, just days after a blistering Auditor General report outlined several problems with Detroit's demolition program.

The contentious vote was postponed for at least a third time Tuesday, according to the city clerk's office. The vote, if approved, would have advanced the ballot to the March 2020 ballot for voter consideration.

According to officials, Nov. 26 is the last day the body can vote on the measure before it goes on recess.

Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones said she remains concerned about the bond and suggested that the administration proves it can "do better" in light of a litany of issues with the program.

"Why not start with a pilot amount (instead of the full $250 million) to show you can do better as opposed to getting all the money and you don't do better," Jones asked. "I still have a lot of concerns."

Jones also grilled the administration on its lack of responsiveness to the auditor general. The office was forced to subpoena the Detroit Building Authority twice to receive the necessary information for its report and encountered several monthlong delays. Auditors never got some answers.

"It's just disheartening that we're talking about an audit I requested four years ago," Jones said. "To sit here and keep talking about a timeline is crazy when nobody responded properly," she said. "No one took the issue serious enough until we got a bond initiative to come before us. ... It's just ridiculous."

I bet Sherry Gay Dagnogo is mad Mike Duggan has not assisted her in finding out who is responsible for demolishing her nonprofit's blighted Detroit Land Bank Authority house she got for campaigning for him. Sherry was so distraught she went to Cuba the next day,

Detroit City Council President Pro Tem Mary Sheffield said she believes a community meeting or forum should be held prior to the council vote to ensure residents have a role in the discussion. Sheffield said she believes the bond proposal has "long-standing financial ramifications for the residents of Detroit if passed."

"Given the administration's desire to place the measure before voters in a primary in the dead of winter, I believe it's imperative for City Council to provide citizens with all the pertinent information necessary to help them develop an informed opinion about the matter before we vote," Sheffield told the Free Press after the vote to postpone.

Duggan's administration officially submitted the bond proposal in September, outlining a goal to remove remaining residential blight from Detroit by mid-2025.

According to the auditor general, the city has already spent a staggering $532 million on Duggan's aggressive blight removal effort, which began shortly after he took office in January 2014. The city has used a mix of city, federal Hardest Hit Funds and other designated monies.

If given the green light by voters in March 2020, total possible spending on blight removal over the next five years, including funds allocated outside of the bond proposal, could be as much as $500 million, according to a report written by council's legislative policy division.

That means by 2025, the city may have spent upwards of $1 billion on blight remediation, thanks to the bond and other funding mechanisms the city has planned for the next several years.

Michigan state Rep. Sherry Gay-Dagnogo, one of many who spoke against the bond ahead of council's scheduled vote, urged the body to vote it down. Gay-Dagnogo based much of her comments to the council on her belief that the Duggan administration lacks transparency and credibility, given numerous recent investigations.

Citing a search warrant that was executed Friday by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's Office related to its Make Your Date investigation, Gay-Dagnogo said the city council shouldn't push the bond forward.

"We need to remove this cloud of suspicion that exists over this body," Gay-Dagnogo said. "You are able to restore true trust and transparency. We cannot have a representative democracy with all of these inquires that are going on, all the investigations that are going on and all the questionable activity."

Detroit Charter Commission member Nicole Small also urged council to vote the bond down.

"Now's not the time for you to support this," Small said. "It's OK to tell him (Duggan) 'no.' Don't be an enabler for the mayor any longer. Be a representative and advocate for the interests of the people."

Detroit Auditor General Mark Lockridge's report concluded Friday the city's demolition program has been mismanaged and beset with significant problems for the past four years.

The sweeping audit also revealed the Detroit Building Authority — along with one or more city departments — in some instances: failed to properly provide oversight and administer contracts; did not fully comply with some local and state laws; didn't monitor to ensure that demolition contractors met requirements.

Lockridge also blasted the city for having "inconsistent and unreliable" demolition data, as well as poor record keeping that made it difficult to perform the audit.

"A perception that public officials are using the procurement system to reward themselves, their friends, or supporters, poisons the public’s confidence in government and shakes its faith in the bureaucratic process," he wrote.

City officials pushed back on the report, saying the auditor general used flawed and outdated data. But Lockridge's office said they simply used the data that was provided to them and even adjusted to include a newer set of data, which produced similar concerns about the program.

Deputy Auditor General Laura Goodspeed said Tuesday the office was disheartened by the administration's response to their audit.

"We stand by our data, we stand by our numbers and yet we have not heard a comprehensive or genuine response to our findings," Goodspeed said.

Council Member Raquel Castañeda-López urged the administration to take the auditor general and recent Detroit Inspector General report on the controversial Make Your Date prenatal program more seriously.

"I think it's dangerous ground to walk on ... to dismiss the findings of the AG and OIG," Castañeda-López said.

The audit also raises questions about the true cost of demolitions per structure. Of the $532 million spent thus far, about $330 million can be attributed directly to the hard costs to demolish more than 19,175 structures across Detroit.

Of that, $202 million has been invested in administrative and other "soft" costs which include pre-demolition activities such as property surveys, personnel and other costs.

The auditor general found that the average cost per structure based on the 19,175 homes demolished thus far is $17,198.

But according to the audit, the average total cost per structure is significantly higher at $27,756 when you factor in the administrative and soft costs.

The administration has said it "fundamentally" disagrees with the administrative cost figures detailed by the auditor general.

The audit, which focused on city-funded demolitions, was launched in October 2015, when the Detroit City Council requested the office audit the city’s demolition program.

The office looked at the program’s operation between Jan. 1, 2014 to Dec. 31, 2018.

The bond resolution authorizes the city to secure $250 million in "unlimited tax general obligation bonds" to continue Duggan's aggressive blight remediation efforts.

According to officials, the bond will help tear down an additional 19,000 properties and it will also renovate an additional 8,000 homes through Detroit Land Bank Authority sales and legal actions against privately owned vacant buildings.

But several council members have raised concerns about the bond, in light of previous issues with the program that have been reported by the Free Press and other media over the past several months.

In attempt to assuage some of council's concerns, the administration has proposed creating an entirely new demolition department solely under city control and subsequently canceling or revising the current demolition contract with the Detroit Building Authority.

The city's demolition program is currently managed by the Detroit Land Bank Authority and the Detroit Building Authority under a structure Duggan put in place after he was elected in 2014.

The city is in the process of transitioning the demolition program away from the Land Bank, officials announced earlier this year.

 Jones said in a Sept. 17 memo to Duggan and Chief Financial Officer David Massaron that she wants several stipulations and requirements put in place if the ballot initiative is approved.

Dave Massaron, the Chief Financial Officer for the City of Detroit talks with the Detroit Free Press editorial board at the newspaper on Thursday, September 26, 2019.
Dave Massaron, the Chief Financial Officer for the City of Detroit talks with the Detroit Free Press editorial board at the newspaper on Thursday, September 26, 2019.  (Photo: Eric Seals, Detroit Free Press)

Jones wants the bond funds to be placed in an escrow account with a requirement that council must approve any "drawdown" on the bonds. Jones also wants the bond funds to be drawn in five increments of $50 million, with 25% of those funds set aside for investment into foreclosure prevention and assistance.

Jones also wanted each increment of $50 million to have 30% of the funds set aside for Detroit-based and Detroit-headquartered businesses and for at least 51% of the individuals employed by companies tearing down the homes would be required to be Detroit residents.

Sheffield previously told the Free Press that the bond issue raised concerns, for her indicating a "proposal of this magnitude that has long-lasting social, economic and financial, implications" should have been a petition-led initiative that would have allowed "voters to be fully engaged and more educated about the proposal before it reaches the ballot."

"I have serious concerns about equity and inclusion with respect to contracts and employment as well as access to opportunity and ownership after demolition," Sheffield said.

Castañeda-López submitted a detailed memo on Monday to the administration, also asking that several provisions be added to the bond resolution. Among the proposals were "proof that all stages of demolition were monitored — including the backfill activity, any ongoing investigations or litigation, and any violations issued."

A Free Press investigation in February revealed that federal authorities were probing whether contaminated dirt was potentially used to fill sites across Detroit.

Castañeda-López also asked for several provisions be put in place for how vacant land be used after demolition.

Last year, the Free Press published an investigation that revealed just 16% of the Hardest Hit funded demolitions went toward black companies in Detroit. Sheffield said her office has been working to improve the hiring of Detroiters through a proposed local hiring ordinance.

"We must have guarantees that Detroiters benefit from the use of their tax dollars and that the goal is to truly improve the quality of life of residents and not lead to another urban renewal which amounted to urban removal in the past," Sheffield said.

More than $250 million from the federal Hardest Hit Fund was allocated to Detroit from the U.S. Department of Treasury for its demolition program since Duggan began an aggressive effort to tackle blight across the city. Detroit has the largest demolition program of its kind in the nation. Those dollars are expected to be exhausted by early next year, officials have previously stated.

The city's demolition program has faced intense scrutiny in recent years for its practices and a highly publicized federal probe.

The federal investigation resulted in criminal charges in April against two former employees of a demolition firm, one of whom worked for the city of Detroit at some point.

Federal agencies have been probing various facets of the city's program over the past several years.

After the Free Press published a series of investigative stories about the program, congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Brenda Lawrence jointly called for increased oversight of the city's blight remediation efforts.

In a statement released Tuesday evening, Lawrence said she is "incredibly alarmed" by the auditor general's findings.

"The demolition program in Detroit has been marred by a lack of oversight and administrative failures that beleaguer an otherwise beneficial program to the city," Lawrence said. "As a member of the House Committees on Appropriations and Oversight and Reform, it is my duty to ensure the proper use of federal funds, and the Detroit Auditor General’s report demonstrates a gross lack of oversight."

Lawrence said she expects the city to "institute a more robust system" of oversight.

"I urge the city of Detroit to work with relevant federal agencies to ensure the health and well-being of its residents are protected. In order to provide the people of Detroit with the certainty they deserve, I request that the city of Detroit immediately begin to remediate all demolition sites to ensure there are no environmental risks associated with the demolition program," Lawrence said.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©