So, you mean that it is now open to scrutiny, to question "confidential sources", which more than likely is not an original source, how evidence is entered into the court to get a warrant?
Well, gosh, golly, geeze, slap my knee!
If DOJ is opening an investigation into FISA abuse, based upon "confidential sources" used to get an ex-parte warrant to open an investigation for charging, that means the States Attorney General can now open investigations into CPS abuse, based upon "confidential sources" used to get an ex-parte order of removal of a child, to open an investigation for charging abuse and neglect.
I bet the "confidential source" sucks.
DOJ Opens Investigation Into FISA Abuse, FBI Contacts With ‘Confidential Source’
Department of Justice inspector general Michael Horowitz opened an investigation Wednesday into possible FISA abuses by the Justice Department and FBI officials and the nature of contacts between the FBI and a confidential source.
“The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person,” DOJ spokesman John Lavinsky said in a statement accompanying the announcement.
Lavinsky explained that “as part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source.”
Lavinsky noted that the investigation was prompted by requests from several members of Congress and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. House Republicans recently released a memo claiming widespread abuse of the FISA process on the part of the DOJ and FBI in order to obtain a surveillance warrant on former Trump campaign associate Carter Page.
The memo found that the FBI and the DOJ did not disclose the political origins of the Steele dossier in its FISA application and revealed previously undisclosed testimony from former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe that an investigation into Page would not have occurred without Steele’s dossier.The following is taken from the Child Welfare Information Gateway.
The only difference between a FISA confidential source and a CPS confidential source, is that CPS confidential sources are called mandatory reporters and are safeguarded by law.
This means you can lie to the court through a third party contractor and are never held accountable.
#perkiniscoiesucks
Stop the fraud.
Open up the courts.
Disclosure of the Reporter’s Identity
All jurisdictions have provisions in statute to maintain the confidentiality of abuse and neglect records. The identity of the reporter is specifically protected from disclosure to the alleged perpetrator in 41 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico.20 20 The statutes in Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, West Virginia, Wyoming, and the Virgin Islands do not specifically protect reporter identity but do provide for confidentiality of records in general. This protection is maintained even when other information from the report may be disclosed.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment