Friday, November 15, 2019

IMPEACHMENT: Testimony Of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch - Day 2 - Including What Was Not Covered In The Hearing

Image may contain: 1 person, text

Detroit

Ousted ambassador felt ‘big threat;’ Trump assails her anew

 Marie Yovanovitch
WASHINGTON (AP) — Former U.S. Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch opened the second day of Trump impeachment hearings Friday providing chilling detail how she felt a “big threat” after being suddenly ousted from her post and learning that President Donald Trump personally called her
“bad news” on his July phone call with the Ukrainian president.

Yovanovitch told the House Intelligence Committee of a concerted “smear” campaign against her by Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and others, including the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr.
As Yovanovitch testified at the Capitol, the president assailed her anew from the White House.

Moments after Trump’s press secretary said he would not be watching the hearing, he went after Yovanovitch as she spoke, declaring that everywhere she served “turned bad.” He said that as president he had the “absolute right” to appoint his own ambassadors.

At the hearing, the career ambassador told the lawmakers her sudden removal by Trump played into the hands of “shady interests the world over” with dangerous intentions toward the United States.
She said she was “shocked and devastated” upon learning Trump said “she was going to go through some things” on his call with Ukraine.

She recalled that as she read the White House’s rough transcript of Trump’s conversation another person said, “The color drained from my face.”

She said quietly, “Even now words fail me.”

Her removal is one of several events at the center of the impeachment effort.

“These events should concern everyone in this room,” the diplomat testified in opening remarks. “Shady interests the world over have learned how little it takes to remove an American ambassador who does not give them what they want.”

The daughter of immigrants who fled the former Soviet Union and Nazi German, she described a 33-year career, including three tours as an ambassador to some of the world’s tougher postings, before arriving in Ukraine in 2016. She was forced out in May 2019.

She denied the accusations against her, including that she favored Democrat Hillary Clinton over Trump in the 2016 election and that she circulated a “Do Not Prosecute” list to former top prosecutor in Ukraine, Sergiy Lutsenko, which she called a “fabrication.”

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the panel, opened the day’s hearing saying she was “too tough on corruption for some, and her principled stance made her enemies.”
It became clear, he said, “President Trump wanted her gone.”

The top Republican on the panel, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, bemoaned the hearings as a “daylong TV spectacle.”

Nunes complained that Democrats are relying on hearsay testimony from witnesses who only know of Trump’s actions second-hand. He also pressed to hear from the still anonymous government whistleblower who first alerted officials about President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukraine that is in question. “These hearings should not be occurring at all,” he said.

Just as the hearing was opening, the White House released its rough transcript of an earlier call Trump had with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that was largely congratulatory.

Nunes read that transcript aloud. In it, Trump mentioned his experience with the Miss Universe pageant in Ukraine and invited Zelenskiy to the White House. He closed with, “See you very soon.”

Yovanovitch, a career diplomat, who has served both Republican and Democratic presidents, relayed her striking story of being told to “watch my back” and then being suddenly recalled by Trump in a swiftly developing series of events that sounded alarms about a White House shadow foreign policy.

In particular, Yovanovitch and others have described Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer, as leading an “irregular channel” outside the diplomatic mainstream of U.S.-Ukraine relations. Asked during an earlier, closed-door deposition if anyone at the State Department who was alerted to Giuliani’s role tried to stop him, she testified, “I don’t think they felt they could.”

The White House has instructed officials not to comply with the probe, and most have been issued subpoenas to appear.

She and other officials now testifying publicly are providing accounts that Democrats are relying on to make the case that the president’s behavior was impeachable.
With the start of a second day of hearings to consider removal of America’s 45th president, Democrats and Republicans were both hardening their messages to voters.

Americans are deeply entrenched in two camps over impeachment, resulting in a mounting political battle that will further test the nation in one of the most polarizing eras of modern times.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says Trump’s actions toward Ukraine amount to “bribery.”

Trump repeatedly assails the proceedings as a “hoax” and a “sham” and says he did nothing wrong.

The impeachment inquiry focuses on Trump’s July phone call with Zelenskiy that first came to attention when an anonymous government whistleblower filed a complaint.

In the phone conversation, Trump asked for a “favor,” according to an account provided by the White House. He wanted an investigation of Democrats and 2020 rival Joe Biden. Later it was revealed that the administration was withholding military aid from Ukraine at the time.

SEC Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-15974

Respondents:

Natural Blue Resources, Inc.
Cohen, James E.
Corazzi, Joseph A

Documents

Release DateRelease NumberOther Release NumbersName of Document
Jul. 16, 201433-961434-72617Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8a of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing
Jul. 21, 2014AP-1632Order Scheduling Hearing and Designating Presiding Judge
Aug. 8, 2014AP-1686Postponement Order
Aug. 8, 2014AP-1687Protective Order
Aug. 19, 2014Respondent Cohen's Answer
Aug. 19, 2014Respondent Corrazzi's Answer
Sep. 9, 2014AP-1783Prehearing Order
Nov. 5, 2014AP-1984Order to Show Cause
Nov. 6, 2014Respondent Corrazi's Motion for More Definite Statement and/or Motion for Summary Dismissal of Charges Against Respondent Corrazi
Nov. 6, 2014Respondent Corrazi's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of His Motion for More Definite Statement and/or Motion for Summary Dismissal of Charges Against Respondent Corrazi
Nov. 20, 2014Division's Response to Respondent Corazzi's Motion for More Definite Statement and/or Motion for Summary Dismissal of Charges Against Respondent Corazzi
Nov. 26, 2014ID-710Initial Decision Making Findings and Imposing Sanctions by Default as to Natural Blue Resources, Inc.
Nov. 26, 2014Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Nov. 26, 2014Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Dec. 1, 2014AP-2067Order
Dec. 3, 2014AP-2082Order
Dec. 5, 2014AP-2105Order
Jan. 7, 201533-969634-74009Notice That Initial Decision Has Become Final
Jan. 7, 2015Respondent Corazzi's .. Verified Motion to Continue Hearing ...
Jan. 7, 2015Division's Proposed Exhibit List
Jan. 7, 2015Division's Proposed Witness List
Jan. 7, 2015Division's Designation of Robert M. Daines as Expert Witness and Rule 222(b) Statement
Jan. 13, 2015AP-2214Order
Jan. 13, 2015Division's Response to Respondent Corazzi's Motion to Continue 2/9/15 Hearing
Jan. 13, 2015Respondent Cohen's Witness List
Jan. 15, 2015Respondent Cohen's Request for Issuance of Subpoenas
Jan. 16, 2015AP-2229Order Denying Certification for Interlocutory Review
Jan. 16, 2015Verified Request for Certification for Interlocutory Review by the Commission
Jan. 26, 2015AP-2257Order
Jan. 26, 2015Division's Proposed Amended Exhibit List
Jan. 26, 2015Division's Proposed Prehearing Brief
Jan. 26, 2015Revised Expert Report of Robert M. Daines
Jan. 29, 2015Respondent Cohen's Proposed Exhibit List
Jan. 29, 2015Respondent Cohen's Prehearing Brief
Jan. 30, 2015Respondent Cohen's Supplemental Proposed Exhibit List
Feb. 4, 2015AP-2284Prehearing Order
Feb. 5, 201533-972234-74215Order Denying Petition for Interlocutory Review
Feb. 5, 2015Respondent Cohen's Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain of the Direct Testimony of Robert M. Daines
Feb. 5, 2015Respondent Cohen's Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion in Limine to Limit Testimony to Period Through Alleged False Filings
Feb. 19, 2015Letter of 2/19/15 to Os from Division Sending the Division's Original Exhibits
Mar. 6, 2015Email to Alj's Office from Division Counsel Stating the Parties Have Reached an Impasse as to Admissibility of a Limited Number of Exhibits in the Proceedings and Requesting a Telephonic Hearing to Resolve Dispute On 3/9 or 3/6 If Not Available
Mar. 17, 2015Division's Post Hearing Brief
Mar. 17, 2015Division's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Mar. 17, 2015Respondent Cohen's Post Hearing Brief
Mar. 27, 2015Division's Post Hearing Reply Brief
Mar. 30, 2015Respondent Cohen's Response to Division's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Mar. 30, 2015Respondent Cohen's Response to Division's Post Hearing Brief
Apr. 9, 2015AP-2523Motion to the Commission for Extension
Apr. 15, 2015AP-2544Order Admitting Exhibits
May 6, 201533-976634-74891Order Granting Extension
Aug. 14, 2015AP-3037Order
Aug. 14, 2015AP-3042Order
Aug. 14, 2015Respondent Cohen's Motion for Stay
Aug. 18, 2015ID-863Initial Decision as to James E. Cohen and Joseph A. Corazzi
Aug. 31, 2015Respondent James Cohen's Motion to Correct Manifest Errors of Fact
Sep. 8, 2015Division's Opposition to Respondent James Cohen's Motion to Correct Manifest Errors of Fact
Sep. 11, 2015AP-3115Order
Oct. 2, 2015Respondent Corazzi's Joinder in Respondent Cohen's Motion for Oral Argument
Oct. 13, 2015Division's Cross Petition for Review of the Initial Decision
Oct. 26, 201533-996634-76271Order Granting Petition for Review and Scheduling Briefs
Nov. 18, 201533-997834-76473
34-76473
Order Extending Briefing Schedule
Jan. 11, 2016Division's Brief on Review of the Initial Decision
Jan. 26, 2016Respondents' Reply Brief on Review of Initial Decision and Request for Oral Argument
Jun. 20, 201733-1037234-80987Stay Notice
Dec. 18, 2017AP-5396Order
Jan. 26, 2018AP-5534Order
Apr. 10, 201833-1047934-83029Supplemental Briefing Order
Jun. 20, 201833-1050934-83481Order Scheduling Oral Argument
Jun. 26, 201833-1051234-83523Order Cancelling Oral Argument
Aug. 23, 2018AP-5954Notice from the Chief Administrative Law Judge
Sep. 12, 2018AP-5955Chief Administrative Law Judge’s Order Assigning Proceedings Post Lucia v. SEC
Sep. 17, 2018AP-5980Order Regarding Three Proceedings Post Lucia V. Sec, 138 S. Ct. 2044 (2018)
Oct. 2, 2018AP-6130Order Assigning Administrative Law Judge
Oct. 12, 2018AP-6175Order Following Reassignment
Nov. 2, 2018AP-6287Stay Order
Nov. 20, 2018AP-6351Order Setting Deadline to Submit Proposals
Dec. 21, 201833-1059834-84916Corrected Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

No comments: