 |
| Nothing takes the place of oversight of non-profit organizations for the christmas holiday! |
All I can tell you is that Mr. Tom (my pet name for Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch) may have some serious issues in the future.
You cannot advocate a judicial case in the congressional branch for the purposes of financial benefit, where, in this instance, it is for a 501c3.
That is called a propaganda operation because we have no idea about the foreign funding of Judicial Watch, due to the fact that it is a non-profit.
That is why Huber did not show up for this shit show.
Hell, I would not show up, either!
There was no one from DOJ, IRS, or any OIG who was currently employed with U.S. government.
Seriously.
Talk about an ex-parte hearing, I actually experienced an episode of Post Traumatic Fraud and do not know if I shall ever recover.
You cannot advocate a judicial case in the congressional branch for the purposes of financial benefit, where, in this instance, it is for a 501c3.
That is called a propaganda operation because we have no idea about the foreign funding of Judicial Watch, due to the fact that it is a non-profit.
That is why Huber did not show up for this shit show.
Hell, I would not show up, either!
There was no one from DOJ, IRS, or any OIG who was currently employed with U.S. government.
Seriously.
Talk about an ex-parte hearing, I actually experienced an episode of Post Traumatic Fraud and do not know if I shall ever recover.
The Committee did not even extend invitation to testify to the other foundations (Trump, Clinton et al & FACT).
I believe it is difficult to call a non-profit to testify in congressional hearing when that non-profit is not a 501c3, or even incorporated, for that matter, due to it being a Corporate Shape Shifter, but hey, what do I know?
I believe it is difficult to call a non-profit to testify in congressional hearing when that non-profit is not a 501c3, or even incorporated, for that matter, due to it being a Corporate Shape Shifter, but hey, what do I know?
I know Mr. Tom is not even a licensed attorney, so how is he allowed to represent Judicial Watch as the President of a 501c3 non-profit organization, as a litigant, to speak upon live litigation, in the capacity of a licensed attorney, in a formal congressional hearing on oversight of non-profits?
Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation's public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations and public outreach.
2016 GROSS RECEIPTS $67,005,461.00
2016 ASSETS $92,365,593.00Did Mr. Tom use a Congressional Committee for personal inurement by promulgating propaganda into the congressional record, using congressional resources, to sway the courts?
I am unable to present any specific answers to that question, but I bet the Mueller OSC team could.
Perhaps, that is another reason why Huber did not show up.
There was not one mention of trafficking tiny humans.
Priorities, you know, it is that time of season for giving.
Why Mark Meadows would allow such a
But, hey, what do I know?
I know Mr. Tom is going to need a few cocktails because Judicial Watch is now a willing participant of oversight as a non-profit organization.
I also know that Mark Meadows will be enjoying rum infused eggnog over the holidays.
Cocktails & Popcorn: Mark Meadows, FISA, Ethics & His Former Chief Of Staff
And,, in the words of Tom Fitton, the Clinton email scandal was uncovered as a result of Judicial Watch's actions, just remember that.
Judicial Watch 501c3 IRS 990 Filing for 2016 by Beverly Tran on Scribd
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment