Well, it is about damn time!
The U.S. Department of Justice has teamed up with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to offer joint guidance into civil rights violations in child welfare.
 |
| Child Welfare: The Residuals of the Peculiar Institution |
Why, you may inquire?
Well, because there are no civil rights in child welfare.
"So, why are there no civil rights in child welfare?", is the next logical query.
The answer is quite simple because the child welfare system is a residual of the peculiar institution, devoid of any feasibly constructed oversight.
Of course, there are those who will quickly defend the entire child welfare industry, but steadfast as they are, they fail to disclose their financial and political conflicts of interest for personal inurement, which is currently another scope of investigation of the U.S. Department of Justice.
An action, or inaction, of a civil rights violation, is even more egregious when it is perpetrated through the use of federal funds, in order to maximize revenues, in the name of God.
As these child welfare organizations are classified as nonprofits, many Christian, everyone knows that...say it with me..."you cannot audit God."
This means that the iron curtain of child welfare has been impenetrable since its Emancipation Proclamation inception.
This now begs the question, "How are the DOJ and HHS to investigate alleged civil rights violations in child welfare when the databases do not have mandated reported variables?"
The University of Michigan Law School has a civil rights database.
The Department of Education has a civil rights database.
The Department of Education has a civil rights database.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children & Families has a National Youth in Transition Database.
But there is no database on civil rights violations of children and families involved in the child welfare system.
There is not even an exclusionary database of child welfare organizations which have been found to engage in questionable billing practices in dealing with Medicaid, Title IV-B or IV-E.
Here we have U.S. Representative John Conyers speaking upon H.R. 40, a Bill to establish a commission to study the "residuals of the peculiar institution", affectionately misunderstood, as the Reparations Bill.
The study is to address the history of the means and ways of why and how the U.S. has ignored the civil rights (including human rights) violations of the poor but it must be inclusive of all targeted populations.
Only the poor are eligible for the programs in which this joint federal partnership is investigating; therefore, the only way to payback for the social assistance, where being impoverished is statutorily considered moral turpitude, is to lose one's children through termination of parental rights, the edifice of the 13th Amendment.
Canada issued a formal apology on how it has treated aboriginal children and families and did not even have slavery, but not the U.S.
But there is no database on civil rights violations of children and families involved in the child welfare system.
There is not even an exclusionary database of child welfare organizations which have been found to engage in questionable billing practices in dealing with Medicaid, Title IV-B or IV-E.
Here we have U.S. Representative John Conyers speaking upon H.R. 40, a Bill to establish a commission to study the "residuals of the peculiar institution", affectionately misunderstood, as the Reparations Bill.
The study is to address the history of the means and ways of why and how the U.S. has ignored the civil rights (including human rights) violations of the poor but it must be inclusive of all targeted populations.
Only the poor are eligible for the programs in which this joint federal partnership is investigating; therefore, the only way to payback for the social assistance, where being impoverished is statutorily considered moral turpitude, is to lose one's children through termination of parental rights, the edifice of the 13th Amendment.
Canada issued a formal apology on how it has treated aboriginal children and families and did not even have slavery, but not the U.S.
This letter of guidance should be considered more along the lines of a notice of intent.
There are other areas of awakening within the DOJ and HHS, but the work will be slow and arduous as there are many, many, powerful players who do not want a single thing to change.
To my #Superfans ... you know where to find me.
There are other areas of awakening within the DOJ and HHS, but the work will be slow and arduous as there are many, many, powerful players who do not want a single thing to change.
To my #Superfans ... you know where to find me.
Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services Issue Joint Guidance for Child Welfare Systems by Beverly Tran on Scribd
Here is the guidance for the DOJ and HHS.
Who knows, perhaps one day when the U.S. admits child welfare has no civil rights, it will finally agree to sign on.
U,N. Convention on the Rights of the Child by Beverly Tran on Scribd
If you believe you or a child's civil rights have been violated, file up with your stories.
Information about filing a Title VI complaint with DOJ can be found at www.justice.gov/crt/howfile-complaint.
Individuals who believe they have been aggrieved under Title VI should file complaints at the earliest opportunity. You can also file a Title VI complaint with OCR at www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/complaints/index.html.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
This popped up.
ReplyDelete