To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit uniformed law enforcement officers to carry agency-issued firearms in certain Federal facilities, and for other purposes.
Well, it seems we have new developments in our continuing series of Cocktails & Popcorn.
Raskins asked Goodlatte to enter into the record the financial records of Michael Cohen seized from his home which produced three instances of indication that there are missing SAR mandated reports of suspicious financial activities that have, I guess, magically disappeared in FinCEN databases dealing with Essential Consultants.
Cohen Leaker Steps Forward: "To Say That I Am Terrified Right Now Would Be An Understatement"
The plot thickens, does it not?
Essential Consultants must have been busy, busy, busy building those dossiers.
I bet Essential Consultants was really busy, busy, busy on or about August 20, 2015 or at least someone was.
I decided to save the Committee some time and just tell them that the difference is privatization because there are no civil rights; just use the child welfare system as your working model of comparison, which is probably how Essential Consultants were busy, busy, busy.
Most States do not execute any oaths of office for Child Protective Service workers or its privatized contractual services and you can see how that is working out.
Oh, and they talked about holding a hearing about the difference between a sworn officer and a civil officer, like "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) doing private consulting for a federal law enforcement agency by hiring more "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) who then hire someone to throw under the bus when they get busted as being a civil officer through privatization.
Then, the immunity of "attorney-client" privilege becomes the enigma wrapped in the conundrum of
the corporate shape shifting of privatization.
Just consider myself as the original source when it comes to the subject matter of sworn officers v. civilian law enforcement officers.
Here is a really great piece of privatized predictive propaganda to hand out to "The Elected Ones" who will do anything for another re-election dollar, so they can make sure everyone continues to keep their Byrne private policing contracts.
Always remember, all that private data are being exfiltrated through those privatized, intellectual property, framed zooms, to other foreign corporate entities who like to keep busy, busy, busy.
Michigan tried to arm a civilian policy enforcement officers for the purposes of suspected welfare fraud in Department of Health & Human Services Offices.
My apologies for not finding the introduced Bill, but when I questioned the Senator who supported it on the sworn v. civil policy enforcement officers being armed, I was met with silence, but it took a few years to learn why I was ignored.
Civilian Staff in Policing: An Assessment of the 2009 Byrne Civilian Hiring Program by Beverly Tran on Scribd
115th CONGRESS
1st Session |
H.R.2561
To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit uniformed law enforcement officers to carry agency-issued firearms in certain Federal facilities, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 19, 2017
Mr. Hollingsworth (for himself and Mr. Reichert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit uniformed law enforcement officers to carry agency-issued firearms in certain Federal facilities, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
“(6) The term ‘uniformed officer, agent, or employee’ means an officer, agent, or employee wearing a clearly identifiable agency standard-issued uniform with a clearly identifiable agency-issued identification badge.”.Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
This Act may be cited as the “Protecting Officers of the Law In Civilian Establishments Act of 2017” or as the “POLICE Act of 2017”.
Section 930 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in paragraph (2), by striking “or” at the end;
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(4) the lawful carrying of agency-issued firearms and other dangerous weapons in Facility Security Level I and II Federal civilian public access facilities by a uniformed officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law.”; and
(2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following:
“(4) The term ‘Facility Security Level’ means a security risk assessment level assigned to a Federal facility by the facility’s security agency in accordance with the biannually issued Interagency Security Committee Standard.
“(5) The term ‘civilian public access facility’ means a facility open to the general public.
No comments:
Post a Comment