Michigan Central Registry For Abuse & Neglect Is The Children's Trust Fund Database Of Trafficking Tiny Humans

FUN FACT! PRIVATIZED CONTRACTED CHILD PLACING AGENCIES AND CORPORATE PARENTS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE CENTRAL REGISTRY

In the spirit of fuchsia...

Why you should care about Michigan's Central Registry for Abuse and Neglect

What is Central Registry and why you should care?

The Central Registry is a database of human chattel for asset forfeiture for the Michigan Children's Trust Fund.  You should care because you are probably on it if you hail for the population of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

The First Data Collection Repository of asset forfeiture
Michigan Central Registry

There are 300,000 people on Michigan's Central Registry for abuse and neglect. The database gives select entities - Child Protective Services, schools, police, courts, and employers and volunteer agencies working with children - access to a subject's background information, including alleged harm to children that does not rise to the criminal level. Those convicted of harming children go on the registry.

The Central Registry is also a database of Medicaid fraud in child welfare because it contains evidence of false claims, double billing, phantom billing, human trafficking, asset forfeiture, and a bunch of other made up crap to cover up the state's operations of trafficking tiny humans through foster care and adoption.

How do you get on the registry?

The wind blows in a different direction; you ask for help for your child; lack of health care, someone does not like the way you look, the chicken crossed the road, you are disabled, your child is disabled, lack of education, or, you could just be part of the targeted population of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth). There are no civil rights in child welfare.

Commit a crime against a child. Or, have your parental rights to a child terminated for abuse or neglect. In other cases, a CPS worker, in consultation with a supervisor, can place someone on the registry after finding evidence of abuse or neglect. The subject can seek a review by an administrative law judge, whose ruling can be appealed to circuit court.

Wrong. You have to hail from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) Title IV-A criteria for funding. If, in fact, someone does commit a crime, other than being poor because poverty is considered the crime of abuse and neglect for "failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child", that individual is tried, in a court of law as being innocent until proven guilty.  In child welfare proceedings, you are guilty until proven innocent.

As for seeking a review by an administrative law judge, there are no constitutionalities in administrative law. For example, you can be denied expunction from the Central Registry for the simple fact that you were placed on the Central Registry.  Seriously, and I can prove it.  Just ask Steve Yager.

"There's a checks-and-balances system in place," Rachael Wineland, Child Protective Services policy analyst, told MLive/The Grand Rapids Press at her Lansing office.

Rachael Wineland is a damn lie, either that or she is just stupid and needs to be removed from her position for interfering in federal and state investigations.

Why does Michigan have the Central Registry?

Consider it as the ship's property manifest of the UCC Children's Trust Fund.

It's mandated by the state and federal government, though registries differ by state. It's intended to protect children from those whose neglect or abuse of a child did not rise to the criminal level.

There goes that legal assertion of the 13th Amendment Exception Clause. If someone committed a crime that rose to the level of an adult, there would be due process and conviction, removing the need for the database.

Assistant Attorney General Kristin Heyse said the state "has a strong interest in ensuring the safety of children and protecting children. In fact, it is well established that both the safety and the protecting of children are compelling state interests."

NOTE TO SELF: FILE AN ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE ON KRISTIN HEYSE FOR LYING AND COVERING UP KIDS IN FOSTER CARE WHO HAVE BEEN DRUGGED AS LAB RATS, RAPED, TORTURED, MURDERED, ATTEMPTED SUICIDE AND WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMMITTED SUICIDE.

The compelling state interest is to maximize revenue because these actions of Child Protective Services are carried out through private contracts and the parties on the Central Registry cannot afford an attorney nor will the Attorney General intervene as there is that inherent conflict of interest in having to contemporaneously prosecute and represent the privatized agency.

Besides, "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) cannot afford an attorney, let alone find one competent or gutsy enough to jeopardize their legal career taking on cases as this.

Kristin probably has no clue about the functions of the Foster Care Review Board.

What do critics say?

The Central Registry is a human trafficking database.

It is also a foreign operation.

The registry is easy to get on, difficult to get off. The threshold to substantiate abuse or neglect - preponderance of evidence - is far less than beyond a reasonable doubt, required for a criminal conviction.

There is no due process. Period.

"It is my impression from having handled these expunction cases for years, that many people do not know about the Central Registry - this is true for the general public and those involved in the child-welfare system," said Paula Aylward, a Marshall attorney who specializes in family law.

See, you are supposed to be notified that you are on the Central Registry, but they never do.  You are placed on the Central Registry immediately upon an anonymous call to CPS. Sex offenders get treated better than parents in poverty.

Some have been informed they were on the registry after being denied employment working with children. The law has changed requiring notification.

Yes, that is correct.  You can be denied employment, housing, education, even your own kids.  I consider it a legal verification of being an original source.

Lansing attorney Cassandra Drysdale-Crown said the registry gives CPS workers too much power.

Power? Nah. Pro forma.

"They're making a determination based on maybe an hour interview, maybe,  that somebody is a substantial risk of future harm of abuse and neglect."

Interview? Some people get interviews before being placed on the Central Registry? Wow. Lucky them.

She was also critical of a computer system that assigns points to determine placement on the registry.

She is referring to SACWIS, which sucks, badly, really badly, which is why I call the Central Registry the database of Medicaid fraud in child welfare.

"What other process in our entire country can totally destroy so many fundamental liberties with an arbitrary computer program? CPS would lead you to believe that everybody on Central Registry has been found guilty of something."

They have been found guilty of being one with "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) due to that pesky 13th Amendment Exception. 

No money, no justice.

Where can you see the registry?

It is not public. Only certain organizations and employers can gain access to results by submitting a name to the state.

It is called privatization of trafficking tiny humans for the purposes of covering up a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©