Oklahoma State Representative Mike Ritze suggests a new policy to traffic tiny humans.
In the spirit of fuchsia...
An
Oklahoma Republican sparked controversy after he suggested turning over thousands of the state’s non-English speaking students to Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a way to save money.
This is not a proposed measure to save money. This is a proposed policy to maximize revenues to kick off the privatization of child welfare services in the state.
To begin, Mike Ritze's real name is James Michael Ritze and he just reported $17,200 injection into his campaign from PACs.
Republican Rep. Mike Ritze, said Oklahoma could solve some of its money problems by identifying what his caucus believes are 82,000 non-English speaking students and sending them to ICE to determine whether they are citizens in an interview with local news station
News9.
“Identify them and then turn them over to ICE to see if they truly are citizens — and do we really have to educate noncitizens?” Ritze asked.
This is called forced assimilation.
This is exactly what they did, and are still doing to Native Americans...in Oklahoma, because this is a christian nation, remember?
The 1982 Supreme Court decision Plyler v. Doe prohibits states from denying education to undocumented immigrants. The Associated Press reports that there are 50,000 English learners in Oklahoma’s public schools, and many of the students could be U.S. citizens.Ritze’s proposal, which he said could save Oklahoma $60 million, received immediate backlash from colleagues and education officials.
Of course, I went through my archives on Oklahoma and it does not have a very good track record when it comes to its child welfare system because it was continuously sued.
“We shouldn’t try to fix the budget hole by threatening children,” Oklahoma state schools Superintendent Joy Hofmeister tweeted. “We are better than that.”
Hofmeister
told the Associated Press the idea was “utterly shameful.” Other Republicans also dismissed Ritze’s plan.
 |
Jeramy Carter Lund,
The guy who probably came up with the
idea of trafficking tiny humans
who do not speak English for his
Social Impact Bonds. |
Ritze did not come up with this plan. He is lacks the cognitive skills to generate such an idea such as this. He was either:
A. Bribed;
B. Blackmailed; or,
C. Just really slimy.
“On this subject of deporting students, that is not a position that we support,” Republican Rep. Chuck Strohm
told the AP.
This "idea" really has nothing to do about the issue of deportation. It is about generating profit through Social Impact Bonds to fund his political campaign. Here is who is supporting this idea, the Sorensen Impact Center of the University of Utah.
It has a trust fund and refuses to report to the U.S. Security Exchange Commission on how much it has.
Jeramy Lund is the "Financial Genius" (trademark pending) who came up with this plan because he just filed his Venture Capital Investment plan to traffic tiny humans on June 9, 2017 and is working through a public university, all the telltale signs of money laundering.
1. Issuer's Identity
| CIK (Filer ID Number) | Previous Names |
| Entity Type |
|---|
| 0001708954 | |
| | Corporation |
| | Limited Partnership |
| X | Limited Liability Company |
| | General Partnership |
| | Business Trust |
| | Other (Specify) |
|
| Name of Issuer |
|---|
| University Venture Fund II, LLC |
| Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization |
|---|
| DELAWARE |
| Year of Incorporation/Organization |
|---|
| | Over Five Years Ago |
| X | Within Last Five Years (Specify Year) | 2015 |
| | Yet to Be Formed |
|
2. Principal Place of Business and Contact Information
| Name of Issuer |
|---|
| University Venture Fund II, LLC |
| Street Address 1 | Street Address 2 |
|---|
| 85 FORT DOUGLAS | BUILDING 602 |
| City | State/Province/Country | ZIP/PostalCode | Phone Number of Issuer |
|---|
| SALT LAKE CITY | UTAH | 84113 | 4356555133 |
3. Related Persons
| Last Name | First Name | Middle Name |
|---|
| Randall | Taylor |
| Street Address 1 | Street Address 2 |
|---|
| 85 Fort Douglas Boulevard |
| City | State/Province/Country | ZIP/PostalCode |
|---|
| Salt Lake City | UTAH | 84013 |
| Relationship: | | Executive Officer | X | Director | | Promoter |
|---|
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
No title, but may have acted as executive officer or promoter
| Last Name | First Name | Middle Name |
|---|
| Sorenon | James | L. |
| Street Address 1 | Street Address 2 |
|---|
| Sorenson Companies | 299 South Main Street, Suite 2200 |
| City | State/Province/Country | ZIP/PostalCode |
|---|
| Salt Lake City | UTAH | 84111 |
| Relationship: | | Executive Officer | X | Director | | Promoter |
|---|
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
No title, but may have acted as executive officer or promote
| Last Name | First Name | Middle Name |
|---|
| Lund | Jeramy | Carter |
| Street Address 1 | Street Address 2 |
|---|
| 4784 Sagebrush Road |
| City | State/Province/Country | ZIP/PostalCode |
|---|
| Park City | UTAH | 84098 |
| Relationship: | X | Executive Officer | | Director | | Promoter |
|---|
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
4. Industry Group
| | Agriculture |
| Banking & Financial Services |
|
| | Commercial Banking |
| | Insurance |
| | Investing |
| | Investment Banking |
| X | Pooled Investment Fund |
|
| | Hedge Fund |
| | Private Equity Fund |
| X | Venture Capital Fund |
| | Other Investment Fund |
|
| Is the issuer registered as
an investment company under
the Investment Company
Act of 1940? |
|
|
| | Other Banking & Financial Services |
|
| | Business Services |
| Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Health Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Manufacturing |
| Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Retailing |
|
| Restaurants |
| Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Travel |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Tourism & Travel Services |
|
|
|
|
| Other |
|
5. Issuer Size
| Revenue Range | OR | Aggregate Net Asset Value Range |
|---|
| | No Revenues | | No Aggregate Net Asset Value |
| | $1 - $1,000,000 | | $1 - $5,000,000 |
| | $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 | | $5,000,001 - $25,000,000 |
| | $5,000,001 - $25,000,000 | | $25,000,001 - $50,000,000 |
| | $25,000,001 - $100,000,000 | | $50,000,001 - $100,000,000 |
| | Over $100,000,000 | | Over $100,000,000 |
| X | Decline to Disclose | | Decline to Disclose |
| | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
6. Federal Exemption(s) and Exclusion(s) Claimed (select all that apply)
| | Rule 504(b)(1) (not (i), (ii) or (iii)) |
| | Rule 504 (b)(1)(i) |
| | Rule 504 (b)(1)(ii) |
| | Rule 504 (b)(1)(iii) |
| | Rule 505 |
| | Rule 506(b) |
| X | Rule 506(c) |
| | Securities Act Section 4(a)(5) |
|
| X | Investment Company Act Section 3(c) |
|
| X | Section 3(c)(1) | | Section 3(c)(9) |
|
| | Section 3(c)(2) | | Section 3(c)(10) |
|
| | Section 3(c)(3) | | Section 3(c)(11) |
|
| | Section 3(c)(4) | | Section 3(c)(12) |
|
| | Section 3(c)(5) | | Section 3(c)(13) |
|
| | Section 3(c)(6) | | Section 3(c)(14) |
|
|
|
|
7. Type of Filing
| X | New Notice | | Date of First Sale | | X | First Sale Yet to Occur |
| | Amendment |
8. Duration of Offering
| Does the Issuer intend this offering to last more than one year? | |
|
9. Type(s) of Securities Offered (select all that apply)
| | Equity | X | Pooled Investment Fund Interests |
| | Debt | | Tenant-in-Common Securities |
| | Option, Warrant or Other Right to Acquire Another Security | | Mineral Property Securities |
| | Security to be Acquired Upon Exercise of Option, Warrant or Other Right to Acquire Security | | Other (describe) |
| |
10. Business Combination Transaction
| Is this offering being made in connection with a business combination transaction, such as a merger, acquisition or exchange offer? | |
|
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
11. Minimum Investment
| Minimum investment accepted from any outside investor | $250,000 | USD |
12. Sales Compensation
| Recipient |
| Recipient CRD Number | X | None |
|
| (Associated) Broker or Dealer | X | None |
|
| (Associated) Broker or Dealer CRD Number | X | None |
|
| Street Address 1 | Street Address 2 |
|---|
| City | State/Province/Country | ZIP/Postal Code |
State(s) of Solicitation (select all that apply)
Check “All States” or check individual States | | All States |
|
|
13. Offering and Sales Amounts
| Total Offering Amount | $30,000,000 | USD |
|
| Total Amount Sold | $0 | USD |
| Total Remaining to be Sold | $30,000,000 | USD |
|
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
14. Investors
|
| Select if securities in the offering have been or may be sold to persons who do not qualify as accredited investors, and enter the number of such non-accredited investors who already have invested in the offering. |
|
| Regardless of whether securities in the offering have been or may be sold to persons who do not qualify as accredited investors, enter the total number of investors who already have invested in the offering: |
|
15. Sales Commissions & Finder's Fees Expenses
Provide separately the amounts of sales commissions and finders fees expenses, if any. If the amount of an expenditure is not known, provide an estimate and check the box next to the amount.
| Sales Commissions | $0 | USD |
|
| Finders' Fees | $0 | USD |
|
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
16. Use of Proceeds
Provide the amount of the gross proceeds of the offering that has been or is proposed to be used for payments to any of the persons required to be named as executive officers, directors or promoters in response to Item 3 above. If the amount is unknown, provide an estimate and check the box next to the amount.
Clarification of Response (if Necessary):
Signature and Submission
Please verify the information you have entered and review the Terms of Submission below before signing and clicking SUBMIT below to file this notice.
Terms of Submission
| In submitting this notice, each issuer named above is: |
- Notifying the SEC and/or each State in which this notice is filed of the offering of securities described and undertaking to furnish them, upon written request, in the accordance with applicable law, the information furnished to offerees.*
- Irrevocably appointing each of the Secretary of the SEC and, the Securities Administrator or other legally designated officer of the State in which the issuer maintains its principal place of business and any State in which this notice is filed, as its agents for service of process, and agreeing that these persons may accept service on its behalf, of any notice, process or pleading, and further agreeing that such service may be made by registered or certified mail, in any Federal or state action, administrative proceeding, or arbitration brought against the issuer in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, if the action, proceeding or arbitration (a) arises out of any activity in connection with the offering of securities that is the subject of this notice, and (b) is founded, directly or indirectly, upon the provisions of: (i) the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or any rule or regulation under any of these statutes, or (ii) the laws of the State in which the issuer maintains its principal place of business or any State in which this notice is filed.
- Certifying that, if the issuer is claiming a Regulation D exemption for the offering, the issuer is not disqualified from relying on Regulation D for one of the reasons stated in Rule 505(b)(2)(iii) or Rule 506(d).
|
Each Issuer identified above has read this notice, knows the contents to be true, and has duly caused this notice to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.
For signature, type in the signer's name or other letters or characters adopted or authorized as the signer's signature.
| Issuer | Signature | Name of Signer | Title | Date |
|---|
| University Venture Fund II, LLC | Jeramy Carter Lund | Jeramy Carter Lund | Executive Director | 2017-06-09 |
Persons who respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB number.
* This undertaking does not affect any limits Section 102(a) of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 ("NSMIA") [Pub. L. No. 104-290, 110 Stat. 3416 (Oct. 11, 1996)] imposes on the ability of States to require information. As a result, if the securities that are the subject of this Form D are "covered securities" for purposes of NSMIA, whether in all instances or due to the nature of the offering that is the subject of this Form D, States cannot routinely require offering materials under this undertaking or otherwise and can require offering materials only to the extent NSMIA permits them to do so under NSMIA's preservation of their anti-fraud authority.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment